Reply With Quote
I guess throwing out illogical assertions is your way of throwing a tantrum in lieu of hitting the walls.
And funnily enough I did answer your question while you ran from my question.
Since your question was answered before you asked it, there is no victory to be had.
Sorry. It's all been settled for awhile now. Thanks again for backing into agreeing with me.
I guess throwing out illogical assertions is your way of throwing a tantrum in lieu of hitting the walls.
And funnily enough I did answer your question while you ran from my question.
One can always tell you're frustrated when you break out the thesaurus.
You did not.And funnily enough I did answer your question
What you call a thesaurus, I call just understanding the application of words. But I do agree that you love to define people's moods in a cheap attempt to deflect from your inep ude.
See what I mean?
I see that you may be insecure. But I needn't harp on that. I'd just be kicking you while you're down.
You're the one who can't figure out why I said her tweet was stupid.
I've put forth the answer. You're free to tell me in which you feel I've erred.
You've erred by answering incorrectly.
Why do you prefer going in circles instead of just restating your answer
In this case I want to see if he can figure it out. Apparently he cannot.
People should be careful what they tweet because billionaire snowflakes will flip out and not hire your boyfriend or block your cancer having ass from expressing your political opinion.
Last edited by Pavlov; 09-21-2017 at 11:29 AM.
Are you really that afraid to return to the substantive dialogue?
1. He knows I answered his question (correctly).
2. He doesn't want to return to the point of conversation in which he'll look like a .
3. This is his patented stalling / avoidance technique.
you're still missing it.
You're still stalling.
I completely spelled it out for you. I can't understand it for you.
Hmm. From an "edited" post. But okay, we can progress forth. That is certainly an answer to the question finally.
I had already said it long ago. Thanks again for agreeing with me.
Post the alleged answer from long ago, then.
Well, you had to hedge (finally) because you had criticized Curt Schilling for not watching what he tweeted (and you had been called out for being the you are). But you're still pretending that it was reasonable for CK's to talk his prospective employer and that he's a victim. SJW snowflakes like you never think they have to take responsibility for their actions.
Nope. You're free to use the search function.
Different tweet, different person. You really can't keep track of things.
I said they were both stupid.
You clearly don't want your standard avoidance to be properly analyzed. It's alright; we all know you ran in circles like a .
Sorry I figured you were prattling on; I didn't realize you were going to make this about your Trump daddy issues, too.
You had two completely different initial reactions/assertions. For Schilling it was his fault for not being more mindful. For CK it was that he was a victim. Patented SJW snowflake mentality!I said they were both stupid.
CK didn't send the tweet. Guilt by association.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions