MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell Apologizes for Cursing at Staff

[Chucho]

You like saying Mmmmm a lot dont you? Is that a gay reflex from sucking so much ?

Anyway, how are you not grasping the irony here? Semen shielding for others check. Coming out of nowhere into the "line of fire" to shill for DMC and his ilk, check.

There is no originality in your gene at all. Talking to you is as if I'm talking to DMC or the self outing Spurrtacular. All the same person to me. Same traits.

Not able to see differences with all the jizisms crusting your eyes shut.

And the audacity of a surface thinking, echo like you talking about originality while employing the handy dandy grouping Fascists like you exhibit. Quite angry for a .

[Reck]

Not able to see differences with all the jizisms crusting your eyes shut.

And the audacity of a surface thinking, echo like you talking about originality while employing the handy dandy grouping Fascists like you exhibit. Quite angry for a .

Existing for the mere purpose of propping up another account holder here must be hard for you.

[Chucho]

Existing for the mere purpose of propping up another account holder here must be hard for you.

LOL. That's you're second role behind being a latent . Denial springs eternal.

[Reck]

LOL. That's you're second role behind being a latent . Denial springs eternal.

Oh man, that's telling me. Sick burn, shill.

[Spurtacular]

...same discussion from the same bucket eater.

I dunno what hetero male would so haply (and consistently) use such crudely sexual analogies.

You need to do your beta run and come out, bro. If you can't handle it here, forget real life.

[Reck]

I dunno what hetero male would so haply (and consistently) use such crudely sexual analogies.

You need to do your beta run and come out, bro. If you can't handle it here, forget real life.

Oh look who still talking about sexuality.

Check yourself, as you are on the record as saying the following:

Do you often fantasize of circle jerking with dudes and sharing a rag?

Go back to whacking off.

You should probably check your tampon

How did you put it again? How does a hetero male haply and so constantly make so many sexual analogies.

[Spurtacular]

Reck

Re 1: Wasn't my rag analogy.
Re 2: Colloquial response.
Re 3: Tampons aren't sexual to non-freaks; thought we went over this.

Does it bother you to have your sexuality challenged?

[Reck]

Reck

Re 1: Wasn't my rag analogy.
Re 2: Colloquial response.
Re 3: Tampons aren't sexual to non-freaks; thought we went over this.

Does it bother you to have your sexuality challenged?

The people you replied to were all dudes. When have you ever heard or seem a male menstruating and using tampons?

You went above and beyond making gay analogies when refering to other male posters.

You dont need to explain your obssesion to me. No need to break it down. I am just point out your idiocy and hypocrisy. Also your denials.

[Spurtacular]

The people you replied to were all dudes. When have you ever heard or seem a male menstruating and using tampons?

You went above and beyond making gay analogies when refering to other male posters.

You dont need to explain your obssesion to me. No need to break it down. I am just point out your idiocy and hypocrisy. Also your denials.

Freud would be quite interested in how you continue to equate menstruation with sexuality (even after having this brought to your attention multiple times).

[Reck]

Freud would be quite interested in how you continue to equate menstruation with sexuality (even after having this brought to your attention multiple times).

I am? You brought it up on a post to Pavlov. I never once mentioned it.

Your contortions and pretzel twists in the face of your self outing has been noted.

[Spurtacular]

Your contortions and pretzel twists in the face of your self outing has been noted.

You would talk about contortions and pretzel twists as you're optimistically calling someone sexual. You're a dream case for Freud.

[Reck]

You would talk about contortions and pretzel twists as you're optimistically calling someone sexual. You're a dream case for Freud.

Nice dodge. Doesn't change the fact you initiated multiple conversations about the same subject with different posters.

Calling hypocrisy on your part is easy. I will continue to do so when I see it, closet case.

[Spurtacular]

Nice dodge. Doesn't change the fact you initiated multiple conversations about the same subject with different posters.

Calling hypocrisy on your part is easy. I will continue to do so when I see it, closet case.

Frightened trans logic: 'You're sexual for calling out my sexuality.'

[Reck]

Frightened trans logic: 'You're sexual for calling out my sexuality.'

You're skating now. Shook after being exposed.

You've been pretty dugged in talking about sexuality for an entire week. I merely exposed your posts.

If you came to the conclusion that I'm calling you a gay based on your own posts. Then that's on you.

[Spurtacular]

You're skating now. Shook after being exposed.

You've been pretty dugged in talking about sexuality for an entire week. I merely exposed your posts.

If you came to the conclusion that I'm calling you a gay based on your own posts. Then that's on you.

Plenty of denial and lashing out. What do you think is preventing you from owning your sexuality?

[Reck]

Frightened trans logic: 'You're sexual for calling out my sexuality.'

What do you think is inhibiting you from owning your sexuality?

Cant even follow his own line of posts.

You're calling yourself a got by questioning my sexuality. Literally just a post ago.

You're rattled. I can see it by your posts contracdicting each other within minutes.

Now, you can keep regurgitating the same you've been fantasizing now for over a week. I'm done entertaining your borderline curiosity with the subject you're obssesed with.

[Spurtacular]

Cant even follow his own line of posts.

You're calling yourself a got by questioning my sexuality. Literally just a post ago.

Repeat that a few times to yourself and you might see how such nonsense is so easy to dismiss.

BTW, You're not a sexual for merely broaching the subject, obviously. You're (likely) a sexual as your actions and speech patterns are consistent with sexuality.

[Reck]

Repeat that a few times to yourself and you might see how such nonsense is so easy to dismiss.

BTW, You're not a sexual for merely broaching the subject, obviously. You're (likely) a sexual as your actions and speech patterns are consistent with sexuality.

You're a human gaffe machine.

How does one determine a speech pattern through a computer. And how actions are seem through it?

Just remember who said this and think about the jumble mess of a post you just mangled trying to not look suspect at all.

Do you often fantasize of circle jerking with dudes and sharing a rag?

That's a pretty gimpy jump-in, dude. Go back to whacking off.

You should probably check your tampon

Couple with the fact you thought this girl:



Was a guy.

Considering all that, who do you think has a more prevalent history of mistaking and engaging in sexual talk?

I'm gonna go ahead and leave you with that final nugget. spurrtacular

[Spurtacular]

^^^
Reck

Re the quotes: Going with the randomdeuche technique of spamming quotes, let alone quotes that were already easily refuted?

Re speech: Written word is loosely (even technically) considered speech. Obviously, I wasn't going to say 'text patterns' or whatever obnoxious alternative you'd have me say for the sake of avoiding this gimpy deflection. And your pattern of behavior (including "speech") is quite aligned with sexual cultural norms.

Re girl avi: The girl has a mannish face. That clearly appealed to you whether you were self aware of not. And I'd argue not, as a straight man doesn't tend to post female avis, let alone female avis having mannish faces. It represents your trans dreams that you're either severely repressing or outright denying.

[Reck]

^^^
Reck

Re the quotes: Going with the randomdeuche technique of spamming quotes, let alone quotes that were already easily refuted?

Re speech: Written word is loosely (even technically) considered speech. Obviously, I wasn't going to say 'text patterns' or whatever obnoxious alternative you'd have me say for the sake of avoiding this gimpy deflection. And your pattern of behavior (including "speech") is quite aligned with sexual cultural norms.

Re girl avi: The girl has a mannish face. That clearly appealed to you whether you were self aware of not. And I'd argue not, as a straight man doesn't tend to post female avis, let alone female avis having mannish faces. It represents your trans dreams that you're either severely repressing or outright denying.

Triggered.

You have a lot of repressed feelings going on.

You know as much about woman as much as you know about human behavior.

Thinks a model has a manly face
Cant tell women from a guy
tranny

I dont know what's worst, that you cant stop talking about other man's sexual preferences or that you cant tell male over female physical differences.

40 year old mom basement dweller.

[Spurtacular]

Triggered.

You have a lot of repressed feelings going on.

You know as much about woman as much as you know about human behavior.

Thinks a model has a manly face
Cant tell women from a guy
tranny

I dont know what's worst, that you cant stop talking about other man's sexual preferences or that you cant tell male over female physical differences.

40 year old mom basement dweller.

Your shameless castigation of me won't absolve you of your sexual inclinations.

[monosylab1k]

I knew some idiot would bring up Bill O'Reilly

" I knew somebody would bring up something relevant that I don't like "

[monosylab1k]

^^^
Reck

Re the quotes: Going with the randomdeuche technique of spamming quotes, let alone quotes that were already easily refuted?

Re speech: Written word is loosely (even technically) considered speech. Obviously, I wasn't going to say 'text patterns' or whatever obnoxious alternative you'd have me say for the sake of avoiding this gimpy deflection. And your pattern of behavior (including "speech") is quite aligned with sexual cultural norms.

Re girl avi: The girl has a mannish face. That clearly appealed to you whether you were self aware of not. And I'd argue not, as a straight man doesn't tend to post female avis, let alone female avis having mannish faces. It represents your trans dreams that you're either severely repressing or outright denying.

Re you: Forum Rag

[Pavlov]

Yeah, you never answered this with a simple yes or no.

FFS, your avi is a tranny-looking dude.

OK, for clarity's sake since I think several posters might be confused -- you think this person:



is genetically male?

Yes or no.

[monosylab1k]

Your shameless castigation of me won't absolve you of your sexual inclinations.

Brah, you hung this L on yourself.