Russiagate Hoax: network test prove hack frm Eastern Europe was physically impossible

[Pavlov]

Dodge 1.'

Sorry, man -- that's the third time I asked you about your theory. You've been dodging that this whole time, so cut the and give us an update on your theory.

What was hacked

The DNC. In 2015.

and who released the contents of the other hacks?

Could be wikileaks for all anyone knows -- I didn't see it their metadata on their site. Maybe you have seen it. Let me know after you tell me about how your theory is doing.

[TSA]

Sorry, man -- that's the third time I asked you about your theory. You've been dodging that this whole time, so cut the and give us an update on your theory.

The DNC. In 2015.

Could be wikileaks for all anyone knows -- I didn't see it their metadata on their site. Maybe you have seen it. Let me know after you tell me about how your theory is doing.

Theory is looking good.

What contents were released from the hack?

[Pavlov]

Theory is looking good.

In what way? You were waiting for key testimony from Browder and Simpson -- well, what happened with those? What about the DoJ announcement that Obama didn't wiretap Trump Tower?

What contents were released from the hack?

It's fair to conclude all the stuff not posted by Guccifer2.0 was possibly obtained in these hacks and the Podesta phish unless you have more information.

[TSA]

In what way? You were waiting for key testimony from Browder and Simpson -- well, what happened with those? What about the DoJ announcement that Obama didn't wiretap Trump Tower?

Testimonies are still ongoing and people in Trump Tower were tapped therefore Trump Tower was tapped.

It's fair to conclude all the stuff not posted by Guccifer2.0 was possibly obtained in these hacks and the Podesta phish unless you have more information.

All what stuff? Be specific.

[Pavlov]

Testimonies are still ongoing

But those two already testified and you were so excited and asking for transcripts. You totally shut up about both of them ever since. Why?

and people in Trump Tower were tapped therefore Trump Tower was tapped.

Nope. Totally different things. Sorry, you lost that one. DOJ confirmed.

All what stuff? Be specific.

I can't be more specific. wikileaks isn't a very open organization. Too bad.

[TSA]

But those two already testified and you were so excited and asking for transcripts. You totally shut up about both of them ever since. Why?

Nope. Totally different things. Sorry, you lost that one. DOJ confirmed.


I can't be more specific. wikileaks isn't a very open organization. Too bad.

You can’t be more specific be because you don’t know what the you are talking about. You keep referring to other hacks and can’t produce a single do ent from your other hacks. What DNC emails did Wikileaks release before July 22nd?

[Pavlov]

You can’t be more specific be because you don’t know what the you are talking about. You keep referring to other hacks and can’t produce a single do ent from your other hacks. What DNC emails did Wikileaks release before July 22nd?

Russia had access to the DNC for months at a time. It's safe to say they got a do ent or two in that time. If wikileaks posts their metadata it would help a great deal.

Back to your theory, why have you gone silent about Simpson and Browder?

[SnakeBoy]

you too? GAME OVER guy?

Almost all of you accounted for.

lol Celebrating your dodge as a victory

I'm thinking of a hack. Can you guess what it is?

You can't, I win

[Pavlov]

lol Celebrating your dodge as a victory

I'm thinking of a hack. Can you guess what it is?

You can't, I win

Nope. We're all losers when Americans are wilfully, aggressively and proudly ignorant just to score points on a message board.

[Spurtacular]

Russia had access to the DNC for months at a time.

Based on?

[Pavlov]

Based on?

You know this board is not the only source of information in the world. Don't pretend to be interested in this because you're angry with me. None of you gives a about any of this.

[Spurtacular]

You know this board is not the only source of information in the world. Don't pretend to be interested in this because you're angry with me.

You going to project and tell me what my feelings are again? How kind of you.

You made a bold claim that Russia had access to the DNC; apparently, you don't want to back it up. You hate conspiracies 'til you love them, btw.

[Pavlov]

You going to project and tell me what my feelings are again? How kind of you.

You made a bold claim that Russia had access to the DNC; apparently, you don't want to back it up. You hate conspiracies 'til you love them, btw.

Sorry, you have no other reason to be here.

[Spurtacular]

Sorry, you have no other reason to be here.

So, you'll be taking a pass on proving your assertion that the Russians had access to the DNC data for months?

[Pavlov]

So, you'll be taking a pass on proving your assertion that the Russians had access to the DNC data for months?

I'm saying no one ing about me has lifted a finger to find out anything about the actual do ented history of DNC hacks. You're all one Google search away from answering all your questions yourselves and you won't do it.

You don't care.

[Spurtacular]

Pavlov: 'It was the Russians. I'll give no proof.'



/thread

[Pavlov]

Pavlov: 'It was the Russians. I'll give no proof.'



/thread

See? You don't care about the topic. Only "fighting" me.

[Spurtacular]

I'm saying no one ing about me has lifted a finger to find out anything about the actual do ented history of DNC hacks. You're all one Google search away from answering all your questions yourselves and you won't do it.

You don't care.

Your claim, bro. You're the one constantly claiming you have the burden of proof. Oh, but it's not convenient now, is it ?

[Spurtacular]

See? You don't care about the topic. Only "fighting" me.

Meltdown mode next level.
In the other thread I'm not "fighting" enough.

[Pavlov]

Your claim, bro. You're the one constantly claiming you have the burden of proof. Oh, but it's not convenient now, is it ?

I clearly stayed why I will not spoon feed anyone here. You're proving my point repeatedly.

[Spurtacular]

I clearly stayed why I will not spoon feed anyone here. You're proving my point repeatedly.

Nobody gives a about your excuse / "point". Put up or shut up.

[Pavlov]

Nobody gives a about your excuse / "point". Put up or shut up.

see? This is all you care about. The fight. Not the topic.

[Reck]

No dog in this fight but Crowdstrike's report claims Russian hackers were responsible for the DNC hack. The FBI would later agree with the assessment.

Operatives from two Russian spy agencies had infiltrated computers of the Democratic National Committee, months before the US national election.

By October, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security agreed that Russia was behind the DNC hack. On Dec. 29, those agencies, together with the FBI, issued a joint statement reaffirming that conclusion.

https://www.cnet.com/news/how-expert...-dnc-election/

[Spurtacular]

see? This is all you care about. The fight. Not the topic.

I care about the topic. OP presented strong evidence to support the main wikileaks "hack" was an inside job. If the Russians did other hacks, they were most likely far less consequential. And nobody but you from what I've seen is claiming the Russians simply had access for months.

Also, I'd suggest you're the one who doesn't exactly care about the topic. All your Russian bull is a complete diversion. Those who live in glass houses, hillary supporter..... Well, they still don't break the alleged glass ceiling.

[Spurtacular]

No dog in this fight but Crowdstrike's report claims Russian hackers were responsible for the DNC hack. The FBI would later agree with the assessment.




https://www.cnet.com/news/how-expert...-dnc-election/

Shadow govt. in play. Trump is right. This nothing burger wasn't being announced at the time for a reason.