https://www.scribd.com/do ent/3598...ate#from_embed
stones opening statement 47 pages
gotdayumThis is what happens when the bar gets lower and the goalpost gets moved.
Darrins
Somebody should tell them it takes longer than Hillary's.
So will Stone. And many others.
This thread lives rent-free in your mind. You can't stay away from it.
The Russia collusion hoax will never be forgotten. You and your ilk will be looked upon as some of the dumbest Americans to ever take the stage. Congratulations.
Hoax? A presidential candidate's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with agents of the Russian government with the express purpose of colluding with them to influence the 2016 election. If you're inclined to look at it in terms of Ws and Ls, there is no way our "side" can lose now.
Wait I thought the Russians hacked our elections and provided Trump with the insidious Crooked Hillary moniker. This is exactly what happened according to Hillary. So how did the "Russian government" (your words) influence the election by meeting with DJR and Manafort?
well, we'll just have a look see.
follow the money.
Yep, this investigation is completely justified and necessary.
Emoji parade. I'll chalk this up as a win.
You're the one who doesn't even know any details about the meeting. That's an L for you.
Adam Schiff finally got his lying ass called out.
What did he lied about?
Did you expect different? Prepared statements with indignant remarks really don't mean . It goes in line with Nixon's "I'm not a crook". He was. Reagan's "I had no knowledge of illegally selling weapons to Iran". He knew. We can't ever forget "I never had sexual relations with that woman"
Read my lips. No taxes.Did you expect different? Prepared statements with indignant remarks really don't mean . It goes in line with Nixon's "I'm not a crook". He was. Reagan's "I had no knowledge of illegally selling weapons to Iran". He knew. We can't ever forget "I never had sexual relations with that woman"
Roger Stone having advance knowledge about the Podesta hack
Roger Stone being in direct contact with Julian Assange and Wikileaks
Roger Stone conversing with Guccifer 2.0 before his article was published
Oh, because Roger Stone sed so?
Golly!
And you believe a scheming chump like Stone because he said so?
There is evidence he knew of the dump from wikileaks prior to the release of it. And Roger himself said he had a back channel to Julian Assange. If anyone lied it was certainly Roger himself.
Pretty self admitting and damning tweets.
Critical thinking has always been a struggle for that one.
None of what you posted makes Schiff's accusations true. Read Roger Stone's opening statement.And you believe a scheming chump like Stone because he said so?
There is evidence he knew of the dump from wikileaks prior to the release of it. And Roger himself said he had a back channel to Julian Assange. If anyone lied it was certainly Roger himself.
Pretty self admitting and damning tweets.
Do you have proof Roger Stone lied about any of that? Adam Schiff sure didn't, neither did anyone on the committee.
Technically that wasn't a crime. Just a campaign lie lol.Read my lips. No taxes.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
