Then they should have got that education, applied themselves, be somebody. Time to take weapons away from ing losers. Home owners, those who have substance, a different deal.
A guy would need a background check, money in the bank, home owner before applying for a hand gun. Hunting with rifles is over.
YES...no gurantees we won't see a rich, successful person go berserk, but what are the % of that happening when compared to thuggery and losers?
Last edited by Avante; 10-04-2017 at 11:43 PM.
The most troubling part about this whole thing? Dude bought 33 guns/rifles in 365 days and it didnt raise one red flag.Let see, probably because he was a white middle aged man that appeared to be your everyday normal citizen. I say any purchase of more than 2-3 handguns in a single month should be looked at. AR purchases should cease IMHO.
Last edited by lebomb; 10-05-2017 at 11:53 AM.
who turned this old guy into a leftist?
Home owner... LOL... you claim to hate 1700s rules but let's not forget... in the early decades of US existence, you had to "own property" to vote... meaning upper class white males, usually over 35 only.
And you say hunting with rifles is over? What are we supposed to hunt with? Can't catch a bird out of the sky with a melee weapon.
If a person plans on hunting they must submit a form and rent a rifle if his application is oked. Yes, it has come to this.
No more weapons for low rent humans, yep, just that simple. Putting guns in the hands of chronic losers, nope~~~
The Vegas perp was rich and a homeowner...
No ?
Dude, how damn stupid are you? I'm OBVIOUSLY talking about gun violence in general, ok?
Sheesh~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Look at all the posters here who get off accusing people of being a sick ass pedo when they know it isn't true, but they get off bugging/pestering. THIS....is the internet, that talking in hiding. THIS....is the world we live in today, TONS of assholes out there. Do we really need assholes with guns?
Time to stop letting assholes, idiots owning weapons.
Who you are, is what should determine if you qualify for gun ownership. You have $$$$ in the bank, own property, you are somebody. No problems with the law.
We need to do all we can to make damn sure a weapon isn't in the hands of a malcontent loser, a failure, a problem in society.
YES....there will be someone who fooled us, like this killer***, but it would be a tiny % of those owning weapons.
*** but.....he had a live in girlfriend and was a professional gambler, hmmmmmmm? And as time goes on no telling what we find out.
Last edited by Avante; 10-05-2017 at 02:48 PM.
It's a gap in the law... race has nothing to do with it. Multiple handgun purchases by the same individual on the same day or consecutive days must be reported - rifle purchases do not (which needs to change obviously).The most troubling part about this whole thing? Dude bought 33 guns/rifles in 365 days and it didnt raise one red flag.
And while I won't go as far as Avante is - the second amendment is there to stay - I do think AR type guns need to go. They serve no practical hunting or home protection purpose, they're designed to kill people at range and that's all.
Last edited by Xevious; 10-05-2017 at 03:39 PM.
This is part of the stupidity of the left. He can only use one of these at a time. Does it matter how many vans the Paris attacker had available to him at the rental facility? No.The most troubling part about this whole thing? Dude bought 33 guns/rifles in 365 days and it didnt raise one red flag.
He could have done just as well with one gun and was simply not as "prepared" as the silly ass media makes him out to be. Who can't hit someone in a crowd of 20K or so packed like ing sardines, from a 32nd floor when these folks are lit up and stand out like a turd in a punchbowl? Media makes him out to be some highly trained assassin, he was spraying and praying. He spent a lot of money and basically used a small fraction of the he bought.
Consider that next time you think the number of firearms the attacker has means anything at all. 2 guys with one gun each could have emptied that crowd if they staged properly, but one guy with even 1000 guns is going to only get the cherry picked fish in a barrel folks that spray and pray grants him.
Do all semi-autos need to go?
The AR-15 isn't an AK 47 and in fact a real AK 47 cost around 30K. A semi-auto version isn't an AK-47 any more than an AR-15 isn't an M-16 just because they look alike.
Nothing like the gun ignorant making gun policy statements.
Why does anyone not in the military or a cop need anything other than a low caliber pistol and the basic simple hunting rifle......well? One example of any need for a weapon that can kill 10 people in less than 10 seconds, ya can't do it.
Why does a cop need these weapons?
Dude, how about answering my question, ok? Why does anyone not defending the country or our laws need a weapon that will mow down a football team in a matter of seconds.....well? You hunt deer with an automatic, semi automatic weapon.....really? Rabbit hunting with a...ratatatatatata...really? What would a gun like that do to a dove, a quail?
Last edited by Avante; 10-07-2017 at 12:10 AM.
That’s a stupid question.
Avante: It’s not that people NEED those guns. It’s that it’s our right to have them because the gov has them. That’s what the right to bear arms is about. It’s not for hunting, it’s to protect ourselves from the gov.
Last edited by blizz; 10-07-2017 at 08:01 AM.
The right to bear arms is about a totally different world than the one we live in today. So why are we STILL going with laws/rules about a world that no longer exists and hasn't for a long time? There was a time you could walk in a drug store and buy cocaine, a time when blacks couldn't do this or that and neither could women. There was a time when sexuality was considered a mental illness. Look at the game of footbal, look at how ya cant hit there, hit that way.....why? They used to fight until a guy could no longer continue in boxing, we had 100 round bouts, why change that? So why are we STILL going with old ass laws that have to do with how things are today? We as a society are way too damn ed up to have weapons anynore, we have proved that.
Dude, who in your familly has ever had a gun fight with the govenment, yep....mine either. Right there is why you don't need a weapon, deranged.
As far as I know the only time the govenment ever battled it out with it's citizens was long ago in some mining problems in West Virginia.
Of course deer are hunted with semi-autos. Do you think a semi-auto shotgun that people hunt dove and quail with all the time goes "ratatatatatata"?
Learn something about what you're talking about before you start asking stupid questions. That would be a monumental accomplishment for you.
That doesn't answer it. Why does a cop need a semi-auto?
Let me slow it down for ya slick....
Does Joe Public need a weapon that can wipe out people in a matter of seconds? Why?
You really haven't figured out this isn't the same world today?
Let;s see so he can deal with that "gang" of bank robbers? The law being far better equipped than the bad guys, ya reckon skippy?
Of course not, so get rid of your vehicle.
Then there's no problem. The law can simply handle anything we do since someone who goes off the deep end is a bad guy.
If you see nothing wrong with comparing machine guns to vehicles I cant help ya moron.
Here comes that deranged driver in his truck, so ya jump up off the road, he just misses ya. What if he'd had a machine gun, now think....ok?
A bad guy with a machine gun vs a bad guy with a hand gun, now think, ok?
Why are people like this DMC so damn stupid about this? The common citizen doesn't need a ing weapon that can stand off an army.
It's been pretty ed up out here in Las Vegas. Been a mess all week. I work at one of the hospitals that got 200 of the patients from the shooting. But after nearly a week things are a lot better and the mourning is really kicking off. Tough times.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote