*ding*
I really expected an objective answer from you, I truly did.
I mean Chicago is a *ding* all it's own. Most of the Chicago laws Republicans love to cite have already been rule uncons utional so I am very open to hear what Trump and Co. have in mind to end American carnage. You guys have been acting like when it's your turn 's going to improve. It's your turn.
Why do you keep going back to this gimmick?
You have 4 posts in the last ten minutes in this thread. You have 59K posts in less than half the time CD or I have been members of this forum. You're like the guy who eats Big Macs every day shaming people for drinking Mountain Dew.
You have multiple accounts with no telling how many posts each so let's not go there.
Why do you keep going back to this gimmick?
You have 4 posts in the last ten minutes in this thread. You have 59K posts in less than half the time CD or I have been members of this forum. You're like the guy who eats Big Macs every day shaming people for drinking Mountain Dew.
There's nothing wrong with drinking a Mountain Dew.
*ding* *ding*ding*
Sigh. Ignore the massive gun control laws IL has in place, specifically in Chicago, place by Democrats, in a Big 3 Demo state. Ignore the simple, obvious fact that zeroed-in gun control will not stop consistent gun violence.
I get it. I get you. I thought there was a little objectivity there, but...I guess I'm somehow disappointed. I can agree with a lot of points guys like 21 and RG make and feel the same way. I even agree with stuff Spurm says, and we "hate" each other.
I don't care about forum rep or status or clique and won't bother taking a shot at you hers, but I thought, beyond the troll stuff, there was a little legit desire to hold "discussion" within you. Oh well. Carry on the mantle for your side.
I guarantee the combined number of posts from all of my accounts isn't half of yours (you can verify it yourself).
Not that there's anything wrong with having a lot of posts. But I'm not the one trying to establish post frequency as something to be ashamed of.
Massive ones already ruled uncons utional. Fairly moot point for the last three years.
I don't understand what you're asking here.I get it. I get you. I thought there was a little objectivity there, but...I guess I'm somehow disappointed. I can agree with a lot of points guys like 21 and RG make and feel the same way. I even agree with stuff Spurm says, and we "hate" each other.
I don't care about forum rep or status or clique and won't bother taking a shot at you hers, but I thought, beyond the troll stuff, there was a little legit desire to hold "discussion" within you. Oh well. Carry on the mantle for your side.
I'm all for talking about solutions for gun violence in Chicago.
What are yours?
I didn't say you post too much. I said you post too fast, you respond before you've had time to think. If I can edit and not get the "edited" tag, you're responding too fast.I guarantee the combined number of posts from all of my accounts isn't half of yours (you can verify it yourself
Not that there's anything wrong with having a lot of posts. But I'm not the one trying to establish post frequency as something to be ashamed of.
This is why so much of what you say is speculation, you don't need to read the post you quoted to speculate blindly.
Not asking anything, just stating I get ya and no need to think different. Carry on.
As I'm sure you know, your posts are subject to an edit tag on this site after they have been live for 5 minutes.
If you're trying to establish "replying within 5 minutes of someone's post" as another thing to be embarrassed about, then, again, you should probably review your own history, sweetheart.
No, your question was basically "What about Chicago?" as if Democrats there had just stopped talking about ways to deal with gun violence. The major laws they passed have been ruled uncons utional so Chicago's laws haven't been as restrictive as most think they are and haven't been for three years. I can certainly look up what the debate there is currently as can you. I know the DC Democrats are mostly on about universal background checks now, which I think isn't the worst idea in the world.
So what are other ideas for Chicago from anyone?
You asked if I win when billy bob buys things. I said yes and told you under what conditions. Then you asked how many I have sold since a shooting just a few days ago, as if somehow your 2nd question is relevant after I answered your 1st already. if I said "I made 100K already" you'd say "prove it".
When your goal is to reduce or even totally remove guns from people, and you end up doing just the opposite, you lost.
You lost
Wow 5 whole minutes! Can't expect you to wait that long.
You have no self awareness at all, do you? Like, none whatsoever.
have the right wing weirdos posted any solutions to chicago or all they still using it to deflect from domestic white terrorism?
No, they totally care about Chicago! It’s definitely not a political crutch they’re praying never goes away.
I was willing to discuss it since Chicago's most notable attempts at gun control had been stymied in the courts long ago. I'm open to any ideas regardless of political affiliation.
No takers.
no way would they do that!
Chucho... give us your plan to save chicago fam.
Nope, just asked if It's ok to start talking about talking about it, instead of brushing it under the rug, since it's the most consistent ground for gun violence, which seems to be what the Left seems to be against. The NRA is alt right and getting around to talking about talking about an issue the Alt Left said they wouldn't or had no interest in.
So, is it not fair to see that reciprocated on the other side or are Leftists interested in ignoring it, like the Right, and watching more unecessary black lives lost? Seems like they could really shine here by showing that gun control can help reduce gun violence and that black lives truly matter, and then they could have true founded smugness instead of finger pointing and saying "What about them?" as a universal rebuttal every time something they don't want to talk about is brought up.
Now, had you given some objective perspective instead of a partisan remark, we could have had a discussion. Again, no trollzy sarcasm coming from me on this, just wanting to clarify. I do appreciate the response , but it was a few posts too late. I do get it, tho fwiw.
Once we can get passed why it's taboo to talk about, we can proceed. This is what is crippling about partisanship.
nothing taboo about saving american lives. lets solve the problem. right here. right now.
Always has been OK with me as long as it's just not a throwaway whataboutism.
No time limit on my invitation to discuss it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/9371353/gun_ownership_states.png)