And she was your candidate. You indirectly pointed out your hypocrisy. God damn, you're stupid.
LOL, how so? Maybe because he's trying to make a point on a spun assumption on things I never said. You're still upset because it didn't work for you in the Weinstein thread. Just stop it. You're not as smart as you think you are.
And she was your candidate. You indirectly pointed out your hypocrisy. God damn, you're stupid.
have to disagree with the notion that the Democrats are progressive. In a nuts , since Reagan, both parties have been far more similar than dissimilar, especially in regards to their support of neoliberal policies (free trade, privatization, support of covert operations, agreement on military expenditures, lack of regulation on wall street, lack of support for unions).
they are compared to where they in the 1980s and 90s when the Democrats were still winning the South. People would vote for Reagan and then Dems the rest of tickey. Southern Dems who called themselves only blue dogs iirc were pretty conservative. In terms of Gay marriage, marijuana legalization, trans stuff, Obama criminal justice and sentencing reforms/pardons, and now with Bernie and Warren on economics way left of 25-30 years. The three strikes crime bill would get like zero Democrat votes i would think. The crime bill even added a bunch of new death penalty categories and got rid of education programs for prisoners iirc
You’re the one bringing up Bill passing by compromising with conservatives, you stupid cunt sponge.
this senile old talked himself in circles to the point where he has no ing idea what his point was to begin with.
We just need Hillary to publicly support the border wall, Muslim bans, a full Obamacare repeal, ending DACA, etc. since re ed gots like Chucho and Trump are too stupid to do anything but reflexively oppose everything she says.
i would agree that the support for something similar to a crime bill or a welfare reform act would likely falter but the reason why i would balk at calling them progressive is because they would stop short of creating the sort of systemic economic and social reforms that are necessary in regards to creating greater economic equality. that and they continue to support neocon foreign policy.
You said she couldn't work with conservatives. I said her husband did asked why you think she is incapable of compromise.
Man, you twisted words and posts and still failed. LOL.
LOL, rage post.
But no denial![]()
Trump has flip flopped more than that already. Do you have a problem with him?
That's my hometown. That library is in the hood but has a pretty cool lab for kids to immerse themselves in the study of ciences and computers.
senile old who talked himself into circles and can’t even comprehend his own logic besides “HILLARY BAD HILLARY VERY BAD”
Important thread
I've already said numerous times I do. He's an unfit POTUS.
Sure, sure. Keep trying. It's pretty simple- you said she couldn't pass her Agenda.
I said Bill could, why couldn't she?
You start twisting, spinning, lying and then rage. And then smilies and name calling.
Failing on your own terms, even failing on trying to boil it down to something I didn't say or hint. Just LOLZY.
another guy who semen shields incessantly for Trump yet conveniently “doesn’t like Trump”.
senile old still doesn’t get it, then thinks “If I just write lots of incoherent words then I win”.
That's what you're doing.
Does it bother you that much that you couldn't even lie, twist and rage your way to a "win"?
The same reason nobody does the Macarena or listens to Collective Soul - it’s not 1996 anymore. The times have changed, even if your old senile ass hasn’t.
senile old
So, because it's not the 90's, she is not capable of compromise? LOL. Wow. No faith in your candidate or your party. And it's the Right that doesn't want to work with the other side?
It does.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)