Thing is you're trying to equate two games/sports (like billiards and gaming, moreso gaming) where athleticism doesn't really play a significant role in the outcome (e.g. you can't jump higher, run faster, throw harder, etc to gain an advantage in a Starcraft match) to sports that pretty much everyone who isn't biased agree prominently feature all around athleticism (like baseball).
I would also argue modern golf is an athletic sport. This isn't the golf of Craig Stadler and John Daly. A golf swing is a pretty intense athletic event that uses the entire body in unison. If you're not in great physical condition, expect major back and hip problems throughout your career. Definitely not an athlete:
Like I said, your view of athleticism is narrow. I consider it the ability to control several parts of your body well enough to get them working together in unison in order to perform some physical feat (swinging, throwing, kicking, etc). If anything, "running around" is the least athletic of the various core traits because it's simple to do right out of the proverbial box. I would consider peak Tiger Woods a better athlete than Usain Bolt, because the athletic skill Tiger had to learn is a lot more multidimensional than just running fast in a straight line.

I hate facts that disprove my opinion
Reply With Quote


a 15.1 and up from last year's game 6. Also a higher rating than any NBA Finals game that isn't a game 7 since the Jordan era.

