"Cut cut cut act"?!?!?!

[DMC]

Does it meet the terms of the statute you didn't cite?

And what is the penalty again?

Just asking. You seem to be super informed on this one.

52 U.S.C. 30109 (a)(1)

Penalties are a red herring. The "crime" doesn't rest on whether or not penalties are issued and I don't even need to know the penalties to know there was a crime.

[CosmicCowboy]

I,think we can all agree Hillary is a greedy self absorbed kunt.

Most of us can also agree she is never going to jail.

[Spurtacular]

I was speeding this morning. I am, therefore a criminal.

What are the odds you are also a criminal in that sense?

Welcome to the wide world of reality, where there is a spectrum of grays between black and white.

Way to educate me, dude. Pretty sure people differentiate between felons and traffic law violators. Though, in your snowflake world that line is certainly being blurred.

[Pavlov]

52 U.S.C. 30109 (a)(1)

Penalties are a red herring. The "crime" doesn't rest on whether or not penalties are issued and I don't even need to know the penalties to know there was a crime.

Wait, is it a civil or criminal violation?

And you didn't answer the first question so I'm going to conclude you just got way over your skis and anything from you will just be personal attacks.

[Pavlov]

Way to educate me, dude. Pretty sure people differentiate between felons and traffic law violators. Though, in your snowflake world that line is certainly being blurred.

What felony are you saying Hillary committed?

[DMC]

Wait, is it a civil or criminal violation?

And you didn't answer the first question so I'm going to conclude you just got way over your skis and anything from you will just be personal attacks.

d) Penalties; defenses; mitigation of offenses
(1)(A) Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this Act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting of any contribution, donation, or expenditure-
(i) aggregating $25,000 or more during a calendar year shall be fined under le 18, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both; or
(ii) aggregating $2,000 or more (but less than $25,000) during a calendar year shall be fined under such le, or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.

[Pavlov]

d) Penalties; defenses; mitigation of offenses
(1)(A) Any person who knowingly and willfully commits a violation of any provision of this Act which involves the making, receiving, or reporting of any contribution, donation, or expenditure-
(i) aggregating $25,000 or more during a calendar year shall be fined under le 18, or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both; or
(ii) aggregating $2,000 or more (but less than $25,000) during a calendar year shall be fined under such le, or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.

So we're clear here -- are you saying that Hillary committed a crime when her campaign failed to "fully report" that the legal firm it hired paid money to Fusion GPS which paid money to Christopher Steele for opposition research?

A yes or no will do.

[hater]

He's trolling, like most of the Lib s on this site. It's so they can say they were trolling all along when the Mueller investigation falls on its face. They are programmed that way unfortunately.

Sad thing is these re s have 7 more years of trolling

Poor bas s

[DMC]

So we're clear here -- are you saying that Hillary committed a crime when her campaign failed to "fully report" that the legal firm it hired paid money to Fusion GPS which paid money to Christopher Steele for opposition research?

A yes or no will do.

Statute: Answered (you created a tangent)
Civil or criminal: Answered (you create another tangent)

Keep going around in circles on this.

[Pavlov]

Statute: Answered (you created a tangent)
Civil or criminal: Answered (you create another tangent)

Keep going around in circles on this.

No, you never made yourself clear. I am asking you directly what you are saying.

So we're clear here -- are you saying that Hillary committed a crime when her campaign failed to "fully report" that the legal firm it hired paid money to Fusion GPS which paid money to Christopher Steele for opposition research?

A yes or no will do.

[Chris]

Sad thing is these re s have 7 more years of trolling

Poor bas s

I thought stuff was supposed to happen today November 4th

[Pavlov]

I thought stuff was supposed to happen today November 4th

you believed fake news.

[Pavlov]

Chris

[Pavlov]

Looks like 30 people were in Austin to violently overthrow Trump.

[Chris]

Looks like the Anti-Trump movement is DEAD despite HEAVY propaganda from MSM and Hollywood

Go home and get your f'in shine box!

[Pavlov]

Looks like the Anti-Trump movement is DEAD despite HEAVY propaganda from MSM and Hollywood

Go home and get your f'in shine box!

Looks like Antifa was never the widespread horrific, murderous threat you and Tucker tried to pimp

Back to the drawing board.

[DMC]

No, you never made yourself clear. I am asking you directly what you are saying.

So we're clear here -- are you saying that Hillary committed a crime when her campaign failed to "fully report" that the legal firm it hired paid money to Fusion GPS which paid money to Christopher Steele for opposition research?

A yes or no will do.

The assumption behind your question is misleading but for the sake of arguendo, let's say that's what happened. The answer would be yes. Since that's not what the accusation is, then your question has no real merit and cannot be answered as if it does.

[Pavlov]

The assumption behind your question is misleading but for the sake of arguendo, let's say that's what happened. The answer would be yes. Since that's not what the accusation is, then your question has no real merit and cannot be answered as if it does.

Great. What are you saying really happened and what crime was committed by Hillary?

You're going to have to be more specific than you like.

[DMC]

Great. What are you saying really happened and what crime was committed by Hillary?

You're going to have to be more specific than you like.

Because... ?

[boutons_deux]

the antifa armed revolution originally was a JOKE that Fox and other right wing hate media trumpeted to enrage you rightwingnutjob assholes!

Did any of the Trump-fellating Nazi assholes go into the streets today to battle with antifa?

[Pavlov]

Because... ?

Only if you choose to answer.

Looks like you're running away again.

That's OK. It was all bull after all.

[koriwhat]

You focus on some really important , like how someone disposes of a cigarette and how someone names a bill.

What next, Trump's choice in toothpaste?

Meanwhile you seem to ignore Donna B's bomb about Hillary's campaign controlling the DNC and ing Bernie, but hey, at least there was some catchy stuff happening.

randomguy just wants to deepthroat djt already and it's eating him alive!

[DMC]

Only if you choose to answer.

Looks like you're running away again.

That's OK. It was all bull after all.

You obviously don't know the difference between legal services and opposition research. Congress knows though.

[Pavlov]

You obviously don't know the difference between legal services and opposition research. Congress knows though.

You obviously don't want to actually say anything here. All made up.

[RandomGuy]

52 U.S.C. 30109 (a)(1)

Penalties are a red herring. The "crime" doesn't rest on whether or not penalties are issued and I don't even need to know the penalties to know there was a crime.

§30109. Enforcement
(a) Administrative and judicial practice and procedure
(1)

Any person who believes a violation of this Act or of chapter 95 or chapter 96 of le 26 has occurred, may file a complaint with the Commission. Such complaint shall be in writing, signed and sworn to by the person filing such complaint, shall be notarized, and shall be made under penalty of perjury and subject to the provisions of section 1001 of le 18. Within 5 days after receipt of a complaint, the Commission shall notify, in writing, any person alleged in the complaint to have committed such a violation. Before the Commission conducts any vote on the complaint, other than a vote to dismiss, any person so notified shall have the opportunity to demonstrate, in writing, to the Commission within 15 days after notification that no action should be taken against such person on the basis of the complaint. The Commission may not conduct any investigation or take any other action under this section solely on the basis of a complaint of a person whose iden y is not disclosed to the Commission.

This doesn't define a crime.

This simply details an administrative procedure.

I'm confused, but then again, I think you said I'd have problems navigating this stuff. Maybe you can help me here.

Did Hillary file some complaint improperly so as to commit some sort of crime?

I can see how that might get nefarious.