ABC Breaking News: Hillary Clinton is facing indictment

[Pavlov]

I'm still waiting for you to name them and show that you have any business following politics.

It's your claim.

You were asked first.

You can't name one.

lol

[DMC]

It's your claim.

You were asked first.

You can't name one.

lol

Name the crime: (he names it)

Civil or criminal (he specifies)

Can you cite the statute, yes or no (he cites it)

So you're saying (insert false narrative here), a simple yes or no will suffice. (he refuses to bite on the false narrative)

Well you're not going to say anything meaningful, that much is clear.


It goes on and on, as CD runs from the facts by throwing meaningless troll schtick to cover his exit.

[Pavlov]

Name the crime: (he names it)

Civil or criminal (he specifies)

Can you cite the statute, yes or no (he cites it)

So you're saying (insert false narrative here), a simple yes or no will suffice. (he refuses to bite on the false narrative)

Well you're not going to say anything meaningful, that much is clear.


It goes on and on, as CD runs from the facts by throwing meaningless troll schtick to cover his exit.

He can't name any.

The end.

[Spurtacular]

Name the crime: (he names it)

Civil or criminal (he specifies)

Can you cite the statute, yes or no (he cites it)

So you're saying (insert false narrative here), a simple yes or no will suffice. (he refuses to bite on the false narrative)

Well you're not going to say anything meaningful, that much is clear.


It goes on and on, as CD runs from the facts by throwing meaningless troll schtick to cover his exit.

#CalledOut

[DMC]

He can't name any.

The end.

Sure he can name them, but he knows the routine and sees no reason to start down that road with you when you're not going to provide quid pro quo.

[Spurtacular]

It's your claim.

You were asked first.

You can't name one.

lol

He can't name any.

The end.

Can you name one? You've followed politics for years and you're clinging to the belief that Hillary is an innocent.

[Pavlov]

Sure he can name them

Nope.

[Pavlov]

Can you name one? You've followed politics for years and you're clinging to the belief that Hillary is an innocent.

It's your claim.

You were asked first.

You can't name one.

lol

[djohn2oo8]

Can you name one? You've followed politics for years and you're clinging to the belief that Hillary is an innocent.

Seems like a federal judge has found probable cause Trump and his dumbass aides may have engaged in criminal activity. Anybody find probable cause on Hillary? Oh yeah thats right. No.

[Spurtacular]

Seems like a federal judge has found probable cause Trump and his dumbass aides may have engaged in criminal activity. Anybody find probable cause on Hillary? Oh yeah thats right. No.

I guess you've already forgotten about that "matter."

[Spurtacular]

It's your claim.

You were asked first.

You can't name one.

lol

First doesn't matter. Your history does; and right now you're carrying Hillary's water per usual.

[djohn2oo8]

I guess you've already forgotten about that "matter."

Did the FBI find any wrongdoing or did they clear Hillary? Have they cleared Trump ?

[Spurtacular]

Did the FBI find any wrongdoing or did they clear Hillary? Have they cleared Trump ?

That doesn't matter, dimwit. Your claim was that there was never probable cause against her. Yea, you look extra ing stupid for doing your little laugh, too. ing gimp.

[djohn2oo8]

That doesn't matter, dimwit. Your claim was that there was never probable cause against her. Yea, you look extra ing stupid for doing your little laugh, too. ing gimp.

Of course you need probable cause to execute a search warrant. As it relates to an indictment? There was no indictment.The last search warrant was issued regarding Anthony Weiner's emails that expanded to Hillary.

Again. No probable cause found for an indictment. No charges brought. Which is what this thread is about face

OR in other words. No criminal wrongdoing.

[Pavlov]

First doesn't matter. Your history does; and right now you're carrying Hillary's water per usual.

Nope. I'm asking you what her crimes are. Your history shows you can't name a single one per usual.

[Spurtacular]

Name the crime: (he names it)

Civil or criminal (he specifies)

Can you cite the statute, yes or no (he cites it)

So you're saying (insert false narrative here), a simple yes or no will suffice. (he refuses to bite on the false narrative)

Well you're not going to say anything meaningful, that much is clear.


It goes on and on, as CD runs from the facts by throwing meaningless troll schtick to cover his exit.

The false narrative will be that she hasn't been indicted / an appeal to (compromised) authority. He wants to pretend this is a courtroom rather than look at evidence / likelihoods. And the sad part is he wants to spend days asking the question instead of just putting forth his inept analysis.

[Pavlov]

The false narrative will be that she hasn't been indicted / an appeal to (compromised) authority. He wants to pretend this is a court room rather than look at evidence / likelihoods. And the sad part is he wants to spend days asking the question instead of just putting forth his inept analysis.

It's easy to ask you the question.

You just can't name one of her "many crimes."

[djohn2oo8]

It's easy to ask you the question.

You just can't name one of her "many crimes."

[Spurtacular]

^^^

Called out on your false narrative in advance and you still can't move on.

[TSA]

laughing at the same thing you are doing with Trump/Russia collusion

[djohn2oo8]

laughing at the same thing you are doing with Trump/Russia collusion

Laughing at no indictments for Hillary or Susan Rice.

[djohn2oo8]

^^^

Called out on your false narrative in advance and you still can't move on.

Hillary wasn't charged. Cant say the same will happen for Trump

[Pavlov]

^^^

Called out on your false narrative in advance and you still can't move on.

All you have to do is name her "many crimes."

[djohn2oo8]

All you have to do is name her "many crimes."

And he can't do it

[Spurtacular]

Of course you need probable cause to execute a search warrant. As it relates to an indictment? There was no indictment.The last search warrant was issued regarding Anthony Weiner's emails that expanded to Hillary.

Again. No probable cause found for an indictment. No charges brought. Which is what this thread is about face

OR in other words. No criminal wrongdoing.

Wow. Quadrupling own on your utter stupidity. Probable cause was needed to subpoena her e-mails. You need to Quit Fucking Talking.

And btw, this has been up for hours before I got around to it. I guess your teammates didn't want to call you out.