I remember in the 80s when I was in the UK, the POLICE didn't even carry guns...in London no less. Thats a society.
And the 2nd amendment was made to protect against government, not crazy citizens so using the 2nd as an argument is wrong. People want EVERYBODY to carry a gun to protect against one crazy lunatic instead of taking guns away from one lunatic.
Here's another story, I know a guy who is into carrying a gun, hes also a stoner. He went to the movies with his gun and near the end of the movie cops went up to him and he didn't know why, dumbasses gun fell out the back of his pants between cushions into floor and he didn't even know it. People behind him turned him in. Its not just about good and bad but also stupid.
Speaking of Stupid this could have possibly all been avoided had the Air Force not ed it up. The dude beats his wife and and cracks the skull of a child and what does the Air Force do they let him off with a Bad Conduct instead of a Dishonorable Discharge.
Last edited by BackHome; 11-06-2017 at 06:18 PM.
Why, so he doesn't get a gun? Sounds complicated for the Air Force who've got other matters to think about.
"the 2nd amendment was made to protect against government"
goddamn, you're ING stupid
Gun ban wouldn’t have mattered. That guy was a dishonorable discharge and it was already illegal for him to have a gun. That shooting is a prime example that gun laws don’t matter. If you ban guns the only people who will abide by those laws are law abiding citizens, meanwhile the criminals and murderers will remain armed.
That’s actually true
I thought he was
Not a dishonorable discharge. Not illegal for him to have or buy guns.
EDIT: Ah, you saw it.
And if there is ever a time we need to protect ourselves against a tyrannical government, it's right this minute with that crook in charge in DC.
Ok, it appears he was an illegal gun owner (due to his domestic violence convictions), and he slipped through the cracks because of a some sort of data entry error:
https://twitter.com/NPR/status/92765...-hot-mic-31%2F
lol including deaths in drug wars
If we include deaths of drug wars in the US we can reach millions
I stand by my statement. Build that damn wall and keep mexico safe
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms should not be infringed.”
Its about freedom not crime....ASSHOLE!! Also...your Mother!!
Banning guns isn't going to solve anything.
There's just been a disgusting trend of messed up people who, following in the footsteps of all those cowards before them, have all the more the courage to be cowards & to showcase their cowardice to the nation. In the interest of fame, or whatever it is they're seeking. Ban guns? You'll just see that cowardice manifest in other ways. We've already seen it: cars plowing into crowds, home-made bombs.
So it always comes back to: how do we as a society--communities, families, etc.-- prevent these sorts of people from becoming what they are. Because we'll keep churning out people like this & witness their cowardice the longer we avoid that discussion & deflect the blame on guns.
So what! Let them be armed. People who have illegal guns are usually gangsters who just shoot themselves. Columbine, The Pittsburgh movie theatre shooting, SANDY ING HOOK, the shooting of Gabby Gifford and on and on....legal firearms.
The right to bear arms applies to state militias only because the Feds didn't want, couldn't afford a standing national army.
Try some real history instead of BigGun propaganda and lies, sucker.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-06-2017 at 08:37 PM.
If we include deaths of drug wars in the US we can reach millions
I stand by my statement. Build that damn wall and keep mexico safe
Huh????? You haven't proven your point in the least. It applies to militias period. It applies the "security of a free state". Without the, as you said, Feds unable to afford an army there wouldn't BE a 2nd amendment, so I go back to my original point
Also has anybody read lately about the Sandy hook shooter? Thats one sick using his 2nd amendment rights.
Umm not in this case
Had guns been banned this guy woukd not have been aboe to buy them as he did.
This case would have definitely not happened had guns been banned
Guns will never be banned. Get use to it
This debate only serves to divide us on yet another line.
Agree guns would never be banned in US save a major state of emergency
Doesnt mean gun control talk needs to be given up
For example those assault weapons should not be sold to any ing dumbass that shows the cash
Ignorance is what your statement was built on. When government officials (Federal Police, Army, etc...) kill civilians (in mass fashion, no less) that is inherently the opposite of "safe".
If we include deaths of drug wars in the US we can reach millions
I stand by my statement. Build that damn wall and keep mexico safe
Seriously bro. You trivialized a humanitarian crisis all for the sake a making a pitiful zinger - congratulations on your callousness.
And federal and police dont kill people here in the Us??
Lmao
The gang killings, plus police killings plus ODs make millions of deaths a year here in the US
Anyway this thread is about mass kilkings by civilians armed with assault weapons. Make your own thread about drug war
Build dat wall Donald
Keep mexico safe
Guys, it's time to ban haters. Lets act before it's too late.
More ignorance... and obstinate insolence to boot.
Again, what about the mass shooting of people doesn't qualify as being a mass shooting event? The concept doesn't change just because it's down in Mexico. Get out of here with your modifiers. The folks on the buses in San Fernando were in no way tied to the "drug war" they were simply murdered because they REFUSED to be a part of it - over 300 people passing through that town were abducted, pillaged, burned, raped, mutilated, maimed, tortured and finally executed. I know the survivor of one such "round up" - he wasn't a member of any cartel, and was sucked into the drug violence. It's a very real problem with no signs of slowing down. Money from the cartels is corrupting many government officials and the people don't know who can be trusted any longer. Your comment is ignorant and devoid of context. Did you literally try to compare the brutal execution of people to self-inflicted over-doses?
Are you really this innumerate?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
