Do you believe Bill Clinton's accusers?So you don't believe the accusers?
A pedo looking out for a pedo, I see.
People who cant unequivocally say no I wouldn't vote for that guy; or just plain saying no just looks suspect.
The guy couldn't even bring himself to say he has never dated 14 year olds.
For a non pedo that is about the easiest thing to do. You and Moore seem to have a lot of trouble with that simple concept.
Much as I know you'd love to twist my words, I'm not going to the mat for Moore. Blow it out your ass, tbh.
*Ding*Do you believe Bill Clinton's accusers?
*ding*Do you believe Bill Clinton's accusers?
Some, yes. There is corroboration -- just like in this case. And I don't want him in the Senate.
Do you believe Moore's accusers?
Yes or no.
Libertarianism is a failure all on its own, true.
But what is it about the kinds of people who believe in it, that makes them so prone to conspiracy theories? Floride, vaccines, chemtrails, etc.
Changing up (smiley) (derision) with (derision) (smiley).Do you believe Bill Clinton's accusers?
Don't strain yourself by actually being honest for once. That would be the end of the world.
"i don't follow it very closely, but i know the dems are completely behind the narrative! and even if he was a pedo, i probably wouldnt vote for him if i lived in AL"
Being a shill comes with your job.
I don't believe nor disbelieve them. I said that. I've also said that where there's smoke there's usually fire and that Moore should probably go, one way or another. I don't know why it's important what I believe; I've never argued for the guy.
Why don't you, you know, read the Post article and, you know, form an opinion?
You ain't quoting me, bro. When I said I doubt I'd vote for him it's because I've only heard bits and pieces. My gut tells me he is a slime ball. But as a voter, I still like to perform due diligence before making a decision was my point there."i don't follow it very closely, but i know the dems are completely behind the narrative! and even if he was a pedo, i probably wouldnt vote for him if i lived in AL"
I'm not a Moore supporter. I have no vested interest in it.
You have 50 posts in this thread.
Latest accuser has proof he assaulted her.
A yearbook with a note with his named signed and a drawn portrait he made her.
Mainly to regard the ground swell as it relates to the personalities here; not b/c I give two s about Moore. In fact, I think it'd be a good thing if Moore was sent packing. He's not doing nobody any good at this point.
Serious question:
If a group of people really did lose their minds, and start doing morally reprehensible things, would a perfectly neutral press point that out? i.e. what would you expect perfectly neutral press coverage of some action or event wherein a group of people did something ty or stupid to look like?
Pretty much what we have now, right?
Pavlov
That's why I'm here; to laugh at stuff like that.Obviously, from what he describes, that is a not "assault." But maybe I should go. You guys are trying to conflate such mockery as support for Moore.
That's as far as evidence is concern that directly links them together. Moore cant cry that he doesn't know her.Pavlov
That's why I'm here; to laugh at stuff like that.
She's also offered to testify under oath. And as you know lying to congress is punishable up to 5 years in prison.
But you said drawing a portrait / signing a name was "assault."
Anyways, just mocking your stupidity; not here to defend Moore (as I've stated).
I said she has proof because that's what was said during her presser.
What kind of a got thinks signing a name is assault? She said he locked the car door so she couldn't get out and begin groping her. You ought to see or read the transcript before looking like an idiot, pedo.
So you give more of a about the personalities here than the United States Senate.
OK.
You, you dum .
As long as you don't have to denounce pedophilia and sexual assault, I guess it's a safe space for you.Pavlov
That's why I'm here; to laugh at stuff like that.
Let's try that in another context and see if it passes the common sense test.Pavlov
That's why I'm here; to laugh at stuff like that.
"From what the guy described, he certainly didn't rob that bank, despite the witnesses willing to testify under oath that they saw him do it."
Women don't make this up as much as sexual predators like Moore want everybody to believe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote