Reply With Quote
Yeah, all your posts in the Roy Moore thread.
To use your own term, you are:
#CompletelyShutDown
Yeah, all your posts in the Roy Moore thread.
Actually you are. I'm perfectly willing to discuss Franken with you in the Franken thread you are in. All you have to do is say you want to do so as well.
#CompletelyShutDown
Turns out all you want to do is post about me.
Weak considering I stated Moore should drop out of the race.
I've said that I'll cater to your special needs and answer the "discussion" condition if you can define the pramaters of "discussion." You have refused to do so.
dude has no stance and is weak and that's why he has that ty egotistical narcissistic liberal pack mentality.Weak considering I stated Moore should drop out of the race.
See? You don't want to discuss the topic of the thread.
End of story.
Nearly 100 posts on a thread he neither cares or defends his ilk.
#pedobear
^ the real pedo of ST... yuck reck!
Fact remains I've never said thing one in favor of pedophilia. And you aren't relying on innuendo even. You're just stating a false narrative cos it suits you. As a poster, you're softer than Charmin.
He/she is a tranny. His/her perversion puts him in a group more susceptible to that lifestyle, imo. But I would never label someone a pedo without some sort of actual evidence to that end. I have standards; he/she doesn't.
Bring forth your evidence then.
I'll wait.
exactly... i am only doing it now to prove a point. these trolls doing this are pathetic and it shows but if they think they're the only ones able to play this game then they're wrong.
^ you said you loved little kids. i swear it's in a thread somewhere but i don't have time to search. pedoreck!
I want an answer. The answer needn't be predicated on "discussion." But if it must to suit your special needs, then I'd like to know what you consider "discussion." I would consider this build-up to the answer "discussion." And by answering yes, I would not be derelict of an agreement to not respond further to your answer. In all likelihood, I would've considered a follow-up likely. But as you're fond of games, I find it prudent to know what you would like to consider "discussion" in advance. I think that's a reasonable request. But it seems that you are not a reasonable person to reciprocate.
He/she presumably meant it in appropriate way. But if a non-liberal said that, there would be no benefit of the doubt given by these trolls.
i don't know... all i know is that reck is an adult and loves him some little boys and girls. pedoreck.
right reck, this is how it's done?
You are 100% certifiably got me confused with someone else.
I have said no such thing..ever.
I dont think this is having the effect you're going for, calf.
nah nah nah nah nah... you're not allowed to play that part... you want to lay claim to this or that without any substance to back it up then lets keep this game going.
pedoreck, why hide your love for prepubescent children?
Close republican at work.
^ pedo
Quit deflection.
Real easy. Are you or are you not a republican fillator?
I'm sure you do.
What the is a fillator? Is that some urban tranny dictionary ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions