Reply With Quote
Hes still pretty awful.
He kept the pressure on Beverly and got to the line in like three straigth possessions.
Hes still pretty awful.
Thanks for the grades
Form looking good in here. He just needs to let it fly.
I saw a couple of good looking shots in the Bulls game. Keep shooting it, I want to see more of his form, but it looked good based on the couple of 3 point shots I saw him make.
Not sure if being up big played a part in him feeling more comfortable taking those shots, but either way, he needs to take and make those same shots when the game is up for grabs and the pressure is higher. Good job tonight, though.
I really want to see Murray take the reigns because I almost can't stand Patty at this point. Overpaid shooter that can't play his position of PG or even shoot the ball all that well.
Since this thread was made, Murray has reverted to being a SMALL game player looking good and promising........in garbage time..
Recommendations: Pink the got OP..
Since this thread was made, he was moved to the bench where he has a worse chance of growing... Benching him to start Patty vs the Warriors was a dumb move by pop... Murray even played better than Patty vs them in the playoffs for goodness sakes
He has actually been fine for the level that he is at. It's not a humiliation to play from the bench. He can't shoot and the starters play through the post game a lot, he has to stay off the ball a lot and they used to park him under the basket most of the time. It's just not a great use for him. But even with that, he didn't necessarily need to lose minutes bc Mills hasn't been good either. So it's on him to show Pop his improvement.Every opportunity to play, no matter at what point it comes, is a chance to show Pop.
Another daboom’s curse. And the list go on.
Murray is garbage.
Patty is worse
We have the worst PG rotation in the NBA
It's down towards the bottom, that's for sure. Other teams might have some injuries and make their PG rotations bad too, but the Spurs even when TP comes back, still isn't a very good PG rotation. TP's going to have to turn the clock back a little bit to save it.
Last edited by Ice009; 11-25-2017 at 07:17 AM.
I'd like for him to go back to starting.
....right.. You may wanna double check the brooklin, chicago, cleveland and both LA teams rotations... for starters.
Healthy IT blows away any guard on the Spurs
we have = present tense. Also no.
Do the Spurs target another point guard in the draft, or what?
They re-sign Parker to a 3 year 30 mil deal. 2 year guarantee and trade Murray and trade Forbes because...
Patty and Tony IS forever....
No. Do what Boston is doing and that is drafting the best two way wing on the board.
Positions no longer matter. Skill-sets do and the most valuable skills sets are two way wings with length that can play both ends.
Boston drafted Jaylen Brown in 16' then went ahead and traded for/drafted Tatum and drafted Semi then gave Hayward the max. All "labeled" SFs.
Boston is doing it the right way. You don't see them giving 6'0 role players 50 million and won't ever see them doing this.
Last edited by MaNu4Tres; 11-25-2017 at 01:20 PM.
That's nice right now, but next year Smart's going to want to get paid and if they let him walk then Rozier is eventually going to want bigger money too.
Drafting the best two way wing on the board is all fine and dandy when you have lottery picks. There were no wings left I would have given first round grades (Wes Iwundu and/or Semi Ojeleye might turn out to be fine players but I think you could do better at #29.) We did draft Blossomgame but it was late and who knows if he'll ever amount to anything. Dillon Brooks/Thornwell would have been good picks but I think would have been viewed as reaches on draft day. Bacon/Dotson maybe? Idk.
Haha, why not! If at first you don't succeed...
Agree that loading up on long, versatile wings should be a general focus going forward, but the vast majority in the league have more than likely figured that out by now and with Gasol 37, Aldridge 32 and only Milutinov (thinking match-up dependant backup is the likely ceiling) in the pipeline, Spurs also have to find a big with the potential to at least be something like a low end starter or third big, too.
It sounds nice to say, unless you have a foundational one, don't worry about traditional or true big and just cobble center together with a cadre of inexpensive types like those arrogant pricks, but that only works because they have elite small ball options in Green and Durant, along with everything else they have going for them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions