Reply With Quote
You did not take a random sample, dip . Nevermind your examples were not of things that voter ID could stop, you googled and failed.
Are you claiming massive vote fraud, Darrin?
Yes or no.
You did not take a random sample, dip . Nevermind your examples were not of things that voter ID could stop, you googled and failed.
When that happens let me know. In the meantime, the right to vote shall not be infringed.
No way to tell, tbh.
Actually, yes there is.
Your examples had nothing to do with showing ID.
You just saw some black people and were compelled to post them.
Sorry to break it to you.
Explain away. Be specific.
Yes, Bush v Gore settles it. There is no cons utional right to vote.
Bush devoted years of his administration to finding it.
Can you guess how the investigation went?
Bush v Gore. It happened already.
You didn’t explain how you would find it.
I don't have to. They already did it.
Can you guess what they found, Darrin?
pretty much. No mention of Shillary being a horrible candidate.I would actually say the OP is more of the same bull from the Democratic Party.
”Abandoning the white working class for the last 30 years isn’t the problem,muh minority vote
Fair answer.
Many, many experts and officials have studied this very thing, Darrin.
Why are you demanding I reinvent the wheel, Darrin?
Do you know of any of these studies, Darrin? There are quite a few recent ones, Darrin.
Perhaps photo ID is not the answer. It still depends on another person’s judgement.
Can we all agree on the following:
Every US citizen has the right to vote
Every US citizen has the right to vote (only once)
Non US citizens do NOT have the right to vote
Dead people do NOT have the right to vote
Fictional characters do not have the right to vote
Don't get DNC started again.
What's your answer to what you think is the very serious and pressing problem of perceived massive vote fraud by the two black people of whom you posted videos?
Why do you always run away like a little , Darrin?
In a democracy let's not look for as much participation as possible, let's put in as many meaningless impediments as possible so that only the king can vote. I mean, this is why we came over from Europe to begin with, to start a new aristocracy.
This is your history of our democracy apparently. The fire all started by a Bozo who lost the popular vote by 3 million conveniently counted illegal votes. It's now an issue again. Nada...
You're talking about "ought". I am talking about "is". There is no cons utional right to vote. Run for office, change the status quo. Make America Great Again and such.
Bush v Gore is the best reference of USSC case law that clearly interprets the cons ution and states that voting isn't a cons utional right, but reserved for states to decide on. The BoR only states that discrimination cannot be based on specific protected categories like age (over 18), gender, race, religion and such.
Your other mumblings are moot.
There's a difference between "right to vote" and "cons utional right to vote".
Person A: "I bought this car, so I want to drive it without changing the oil"
Person B: "You have that right"
Person C: "It's not in the cons ution!"
vs
Person A: "I bought this car, so I want to drive it without changing the oil"
Person B: "You have that cons utional right"
Person C: "It's not in the cons ution!"
In the 1st example, Person C is a bag. In the 2nd, Person C is correcting person B.
Funny how you guys like to pontificate about "facts" and get everything all ed up, then when corrected you cite "pedantics!"
Rigged: How Voter Suppression Threw Wisconsin to Trump
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...lection-2016/#
... then add in Pootin's cyber army targeting WI (and MI, PA) and Repug's releasing Comey's letter 10 days before the election.
You would have to work pretty hard at making it "no cost" to the people you wanted to get IDs. How much are you willing to increase taxes for this?
I don't mind raising taxes to make IDs really easy to get.
The thing is, though, all of this assumes a problem exists.
Why should we have a law, or spend one cent of anyone's money to solve a problem that doesn't exist?
There is no "issue" to fix, and that is exactly the point.
We have IDs in all sorts of other cases, because IDs solve problems that actually exists.
You are saying something like "We need to have special IDs to prove we aren't bank-robbing unicorns, so that we can show police when they stop us".
Do you think we should have special IDs to prove we aren't bank-robbing unicorns?
In many places it is. Republicans roll back early voting in Democratic areas.
Thanks for bringing that method of voter suppression too.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
