Reply With Quote
Read his twitter feed, you can pretty much tell exactly when the news breaks.
Project Veritas seemingly caught feeding false Moore accusations to Washington Post
Project Veritas, an organization run by conservative activist James O’Keefe, appears to have been get caught trying to pass false sexual misconduct allegations against Senate candidate Roy Moore to The Washington Post, extending its history of deploying deceptive tactics to try to ensnare news organizations in controversy.
The newspaper reported Monday that a woman who falsely told its reporters she had been impregnated by the embattled GOP candidate as a teenager was seen entering the offices of the organization in New York, seemingly tipping the group’s hand in its efforts to bait The Post into publishing uncorroborated accusations against Moore.
After a series of interviews with the woman, The Post report said, the newspaper opted not to publish the explosive yet unverified claims. It noted that during the meetings, the purported accuser repeatedly solicited the reporters for opinions on whether her claims would damage Moore in Alabama’s special election on Dec. 12.
Moore, a former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, is locked in a struggle for political survival after a spate of recent allegations of sexual misconduct with minors when he was in his 30s.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...on-post-261023
Read his twitter feed, you can pretty much tell exactly when the news breaks.
Project Veritas later on Monday began posting unverified interactions between the organization and members of The Post.Politico
Bannon and Breitbart News are among Moore’s staunchest political allies and defenders.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-fraud-family/
The Post verified.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-fraud-family/
I know Spurtacular is a re but this if anything confirms all of the Moore allegations since it shows the Post being very careful not to print anything fake
No, bro. It's the victims who are the real criminals, bro.
"alleged" victim, bro.
And not blaming, bro.
Yes or no.
So, because they didn't print something they allegedly suspected of being a setup, then it shows they are doing right by Moore? Nice logic, "re ".
Yes or no.
I mean a fake story could still get printed if its very elaborately constructed but much more unlikely given how good they are at fact checking
Where in the article does it say that, bro?
Who said it was in that article, bro?
Maybe the Post staff had a place they could publish information about something they were working on for possible publication in the Post, bro.
Here's a hint -- we've already posted the Post staff's confirmation in the forum.
You might not like Politico, but I don't see anything non-factual in their reporting.
With all the 'fake news' stuff going around, it's due diligence, tbh
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...okeefe/546869/
There is perhaps no better illustration of the bad faith that prevails today on the populist right than the actions of O’Keefe as he solicits donations for Project Veritas. And this is not the first time O’Keefe has failed to disclose to his audience that the uncharitable premise of one of his stings was disproved by a target who behaved well, only to be portrayed by O’Keefe as a villain anyway.
O’Keefe still parts credulous supporters from their money in part because the rest of the right-wing media is reluctant to expose his particular con.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
