Either way, getting this thread back on track...
semen!
Kinda sad that the Left leap frogged the Right in the "dirty sex offenders" dept. since Roy Moore was outed.
Either way, getting this thread back on track...
semen!
So if I read it all...
I would want cops shot for a little "push back"?
Like you.
Thanks. But I'll cherry pick.
Yep. Agreed
She could have said something about him basically condoning the entertainment press hiding under stairs to get crotch shots.
"Matt, can I expect you to go down there with them drooling like the that you are?"
A little strong, I'm not gonna endear anyone with the above but.... So what.
the Legal boys set the bar very high so sexual harassment stays legal below the bar
Boss Grab Your Breasts? That’s Not (Legally) Harassment
In a case that went to federal court in the early 1990s, a woman presented evidence that her supervisor tried to kiss her on multiple occasions, placed “I love you” signs on her desk, called her a dumb blonde, put his hands on her shoulders and asked her out on dates.
The trial court judge dismissed her suit, declaring that this conduct did not meet the threshold for sexual harassment, and the appeals court affirmed the dismissal.
Since then, courts have cited this case and others like it hundreds of times in rejecting sexual harassment claims. Such conduct, these courts have declared, is not serious enough to be harassment.
There remains a sense among Americans that the country’s legal system is well equipped to handle the harassment cases that will likely be brought as more women come forward with accusations,
But this notion is misleading.
In fact, courts routinely dismiss cases brought by workers who claim their supervisors propositioned them, kissed them or grabbed their breasts.
The judges declare that the conduct does not cons ute harassment in a legal sense, and refuse to let the cases go to trial.
the Supreme Court used the words “severe or pervasive” to describe the level of seriousness that conduct must reach before meeting the legal definition of harassment. Those words are not found in le VII. Instead they are a judicial interpretation of the statute — and have had lasting consequences.
a supervisor raping an employee has consistently been viewed as “severe” enough to meet the bar.
Supervisors who have subjected workers to sexual epithets and taunting every day for a long enough period meet the standard for “pervasive.”
courts often err on the side of dismissal.
In the past half century, employment discrimination claims have come to operate in a fundamentally different legal universe from other kinds of claims.
Sexual harassment lawsuits are one area where this systematic bias appears; racial discrimination lawsuits are another.
Congress can amend le VII to ensure the courts interpret its language broadly.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/o...eid=53dcbaecb0
The rightwing MALE Congress ain't gonna do , and the Repug Senate will probably seat a pedophile, power and money annul ethics.
Saw this Garrison Keillor quote and instantly thought of the Geraldo tweet.
He added in his hangdog baritone: “A world in which there is no sexual harassment at all, is a world in which there will not be any flirtation. A world without thieves at all will not have entrepreneurs.”
Geraldo Rivera Apologizes For Tweets On Matt Lauer And Sexual Harassment
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/geraldo-rivera-apologizes-tweets-lauer-sexual-harassment?
utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign =Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29
not accepted, first tweet was his truest tweet.
Seems like it's something the Predators on the Left will be happy with.
The right is getting ready to seat Avante in a cowboy hat in the senate.
Lauer locked the door, ed a girl in his office, she passed out, had to be taken to a nurse
Teehee.
Not the fact that a pedo is surging ahead in the polls, the Avante crack...
Sounds like Left leaning sickness to me...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)