Reply With Quote
It's tied.
TIED!
Hey man, do you believe the stuff you post?
It's tied.
TIED!
Extremely telling imo I remember watching this on video and it was pretty awkward for the officers who were just following SP.Wasserman Schultz fought to prevent law enforcement from looking at the laptop, threatening a police chief with “consequences” and implying it was “a member’s” laptop. She hired an outside lawyer, Bill Pit , who specializes in the “speech and debate” clause of the Cons ution that is designed to protect lawmakers from persecution for political stances, but lawmakers have used to try to stymie criminal probes in the past.
Jesus.The briefing warned that “all five of the shared employees system administrators collectively logged onto the [House Democratic] Caucus system 5,735 times, or an average of 27 times per day,” even though only one of them was authorized.
Fingers crossed but I'm guessing it will continue to get postponed..The hearing, set for Thursday, was postponed to Jan. 8.
Here it is. Look at her asking the same question over and over like Pav hoping for a different answer and then threatening the officer with consequences
So what crime are you saying Wasserman-Schultz committed, Chris?
TSA?
How about bank fraud and obstruction of justice?
OK, let's discuss those charges she isn't actually charged with.
Explain each crime you have accused her of committing.
Shut him down again....
No, he does not. Kind of obvious after a while.
The real crime.
She is as much of a jerk as Hannity or Trump but female and a democrat.
stupid question as she wasn't arrested and charged with anything.
Well I got two different answers.
So what is the significance of this case with what you acknowledge to be the Clinton cartel?
What part of the article is not to be believed?
That the defendant's attorney is trying to block prosecutor's from using Wasserman Schultz's laptop as evidence?
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...states-v-awan/
That these weren't the items found in the backpack?
#1 a Pakistani ID card with the name Mohommed Ashraf Awan
#2 a copy – not original – of a driver’s license with name Imran Awan
#3 a copy (front and back) of his congressional ID
#4 an Apple laptop with the homescreen initials ‘RepDWS’
#5 composition notebooks with notes handwritten saying ‘attorney client privilege’ and possibly discussing case details below
#6 loose letters addressed to US Attorney of DC discussing the apparent owner of the bag being investigated.
That Wasserman Schultz originally denied the laptop was hers?
http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/06/ex...hultzs-laptop/
Won't know if anything is tied to the Clinton's until we find out what Awan was transferring and what is on Wasserman Schultz laptop.
The strangest thing about this is the contents of the backpack that someone obviously wanted to be found.
Funny how you didn't state what you believed in this post that responded to me saying "I don't think TSA believes the stupid he posts". Thank you for clearing that up.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
So it's just innuendo.
OK.
I don't do dabom
Funny how you avoided your questions.
You can't complain about anyone avoiding questions anymore.
How are you feeling today?
Fine.
How do you think this connects to the Clintons?
When did I say this connects to the Clintons?
So you're saying this doesn't connect to the Clintons.
OK.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions