It's in the National Review article that TSA quoted.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...-with-russian#
Clapper left himself room there by calling the claim a “stretch”
Things just got more interesting
It's in the National Review article that TSA quoted.
“up to”
standard
Feigning ignorance after getting caught. lol even Chris saw through that one.
Funny. TSA back to quoting Clapper again when Clapper said he never received a briefing regarding collusion. You a dumb hoe.
So you are saying minor sentences are reduced or major sentences?
Just because it was posted there doesn’t mean that’s where TSA saw it.
“up to”
I thought you said there was a standard.
seriously though, you believe i watch or have watched anything bill o'reily except his outburst clip? yall are low life wannabe knowitalls arent yall? wow!
that does look like james brown so how exactly is stating that having me lumped in with bill o'reily? please entertain me!
I’ve seen the article and I’m not on 4chan.
i've never watched bill o'reily but i am just now finding out that i watch bill o'reily. this bboard certainly has some members that are mentally insane and just believe whatever craziness pops into their heads.
That is the standard dip . Otherwise it will have to be reduced you stupid .
Since he didn't link it I think it's a safe assumption that he found it there or one of the other obvious turd dens. It's telling that the part he quoted from the NR column is the same part quoted in that 4chan thread.
So hostile.![]()
That would be the future of Trump's presidency.
If you consistently echoed material from Bill O'Reilly's show, it would be fair to comment that you have Bill O'Reilly takes. Regardless of whether you actually watch. It should concern you if your positions are consistently predictable based on whatever Bill O'Reilly is talking about at a given time.
I linked it and posted more quotes earlier. And no I didn’t find the article on 4chan detective dip . Nice try though.
well check this hot shot, i have never watched 1 show of his except a 20 sec clip of him going crazy on like access hollywood or some . that's it. so keep playing the game of pointing fingers and hoping your lies stick to the wall. that's all yall are good at around here, making up bs and lying until other bs'ers believe that bs you spew.
btw, doesn't concern me at all because i am not concerned with o'reily at all but it seems as though you are.
What level number is the “standard” offense?
You didn't understand what I was saying and you went on a two paragraph rant about nothing. You should choose whether you want to be ultra-sensitive or stupid, because being both is probably a very hard way to live.
Lying to a federal agent is a federal offense. Now why would that need to be reduced if it's not major?
What level number is the “standard” offense? Is it level 6?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)