Reply With Quote
What about spirit cooking. Where does that come in?
Big boom. Trump and Sessions planning massive arrest raid
What about spirit cooking. Where does that come in?
Tsa still running from this
brah, you missed the whole FBIAnon thingie. You're way behind...
Tell you what sport -- here's the information for the author's of the article who did the interview with Bucceroni
https://twitter.com/elizabethleavos?lang=en
https://twitter.com/williamcrad ?lang=en
I'm sure they can give you as much information as they are legally allowed regarding the interview they did with Bucceroni
Here is Disobedient Media's contact page
https://disobedientmedia.com/contact/
I hope this helps you in your heroic quest to determine the Ed Rendell was in fact not a pedophile covering for other pedophiles.
I love how that is the only thing you commented on after having all that thrown back in your face. Why ignore the rest? Anyways what's that artist name I've forgotten?
stupid question, child trafficking. The exact same thing she was caught doing before.
You remembered her name enough to find the photo of the art and post it here just days ago. Again, it’s your theory. And yeah i will focus on things one at a time so as to not get lost in a maze of constant redirection
I said he made no claims of abuse by Rendell.
I'm right.
You're wrong.
I know it hurts.
Trafficking for what purpose?
I just googled Tony Podesta art a few days ago and it popped up. But I did find her name, Biljana Djurdjevic. I don't have access to every piece of art owned by Podesta but know he owns her work.
and some of this ladies work
and some of this ladies work
Anna Gaskell’s exhibition was inspired by the Brothers Grimm story, The Magic Donkey, a macabre tale about a girl who crafts a costume from animal hides in order to escape the advances of her father.
It should be noted that the tale of "Donkey Skin" is a variant of the traditional Brothers Grimm tale. Both versions of the story involve a king father's interest in marrying his princess daughter.[4]
Long story short spurraider I can not prove Podesta owns the picture in question, but there are enough other pieces that are highly suspect.
Now on to the next thing that was thrown back in your face the other day. What do you got?
You obviously don't believe the author's of the article that interviewed him. Be a hero.
I'm right.
You're wrong.
I know it hurts.
Tell you what sport -- here's the information for the author's of the article who did the interview with Bucceroni
https://twitter.com/elizabethleavos?lang=en
https://twitter.com/williamcrad ?lang=en
I'm sure they can give you as much information as they are legally allowed regarding the interview they did with Bucceroni
Here is Disobedient Media's contact page
https://disobedientmedia.com/contact/
I hope this helps you in your heroic quest to determine the Ed Rendell was in fact not a pedophile covering for other pedophiles.
You're the one who made the claim. You started out with a spectacularly wrong claim that you had to change.
You failed to back up the new revised claim even after you moved the goalposts.
That's it.
I made no claim. I have no interest in finding evidence of your faulty claim because there is none.
And yes -- your conspiri author is a disingenuous piece of with all that Haiti bull that you smeared all over yourself. You ed up again, TSA.
You were shown where Bucceroni claimed Rendell was a pedophile don't play stupid.
Which one are we tackling next?
The Harvard Human Rights Journal stated that one of Bill Clinton's first acts as special envoy for the United Nations in Haiti "was to put out the fire of a child abduction scandal involving American citizens." On February 7th, 2010,
http://harvardhrj.com/wp-content/upl...09/09/King.pdf
Timeline of events
The ten missionaries, led by Silsby, flew to the Dominican Republic on January 22, chartered a bus, and arrived in Haiti on January 25.[7] American journalist Anne-Christine d'Adesky claims that she met Silsby the day before the missionaries' entry into Haiti. The NLCR's leader explained that she had a letter from Dominican officials authorizing the transfer of orphans to the hotel in Cabarete. D'Adesky warned Silsby that she also required proper paperwork from Haitian authorities.[7] On January 26, the group gathered forty children and set off for the Dominican Republic. They were stopped by a policeman, who explained that their actions were illegal. [8] [9] Undeterred the group set out to collect orphans from the devastated town of Calebasse (or Callabas) and from the slum of Le Citron in Port-au-Prince. [10] [11] 33 children (20 from Calebasse and 13 from Le Citron) were put under the mission's care. On the night of January 29, the missionaries were arrested while trying to cross the Dominican border without proper authorization. They denied any wrongdoing and maintained that they were doing God's will by helping orphaned victims of the quake. [12] The children were sent to the SOS Children's Village orphanage in Croix-des-Bouquets, a suburb of Port-au-Prince, and it became clear that most (if not all) of them were not orphans.[13] NLCR missionaries maintained that they were told that the children were orphaned. In turn, people in Calebasse and SOS Children's Villages accused the missionaries of lying about their intentions.[10][13] Although the children's relatives were told that they would be able to visit them and eventually take them back, the NLCR's mission statement clearly outlined plans for adoption.[1][10]
On February 4, the ten Baptists were formally charged with criminal association and kidnapping for trying to smuggle 33 children out of Haiti. [14] In an interview, the United States Ambassador to Haiti Kenneth Merten, stated that the U.S. justice system would not interfere and added "the Haitian justice system will do what it has to do." [15] On February 17, eight of the ten members of the NLCR team were released by Haitian judge Bernard Saint-Vil. They were immediately flown back to Miami on a US Air Force transport plane. Laura Silsby-Gayler and Charisa Coulter, were held over for more questioning.[16] On March 8 Coulter was also released, but Silsby remained incarcerated. [17] [18] [19] The charges against Silsby were eventually reduced from conspiracy and child abduction to "arranging irregular travel". Her trial began on May 13, and prosecutors asked for a 6-month prison sentence, arguing that Silsby was fully aware that she did not have proper authorization to take the children out of the country.[4] On May 17, she was found guilty and sentenced to the time served in jail prior to the trial.[5]
Jorge Puello
In the days following the group's initial arrest, Dominican Jorge Puello falsely portrayed himself as the group's lawyer. [26] Puello later acknowledged that he is under investigation for sex trafficking in El Salvador and wanted in the United States for smuggling people across the Canada–US border. Puello was incarcerated for short terms in both Canada and the US. [27] [28] He was arrested in the Dominican Republic on March 18.[29] On August 18, 2010, the Dominican Supreme Court authorized Puello's extradition to the United States where he was sentenced to 37 months of prison in June 2011.[30][31]
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32795
Actually I saw a ty writer's ty sentence. It's easier to believe that than to believe she purposely didn't mention one detail about what you want to be Rendell's actions.
You got duped.
Again.
Now that you see that ALL of the Haitian orphans are accounted for -- do you think this reporter was being responsible in portraying Rendell's trip to Haiti as a child sex slave abduction scheme?
Yes or no.
"This raises strong questions regarding Rendell’s longstanding friendship with Basciano in light of Bucceroni’s claim that prominent Democrat Ed Rendell engaged in pedophilia as well as his assertion that Basciano’s pornography outlets produced child abuse and snuff films"
The writer interviewed Bucceroni not you. If you want to be a hero and prove the article wrong you've been provided the contact info for each author.
Dodge #1.
You see, that's the ONLY mention of that -- no details, no quotes, no nothing. And Bucceroni has been ranting about Rendell for years. If this is some kind of recent revelation -- he's not even talking about it.
There's nothing there.
Now that you see that ALL of the Haitian orphans are accounted for -- do you think this reporter was being responsible in portraying Rendell's trip to Haiti as a child sex slave abduction scheme?
Yes or no.
I bet this is where they got the info from, tbh... this and the basement...
TSA let’s talk about the art. You keep posting that one pic over and over. Let me see your proof that podesta owns it
I just googled Tony Podesta art a few days ago and it popped up. But I did find her name, Biljana Djurdjevic. I don't have access to every piece of art owned by Podesta but know he owns her work.
and some of this ladies work
and some of this ladies work
Anna Gaskell’s exhibition was inspired by the Brothers Grimm story, The Magic Donkey, a macabre tale about a girl who crafts a costume from animal hides in order to escape the advances of her father.
It should be noted that the tale of "Donkey Skin" is a variant of the traditional Brothers Grimm tale. Both versions of the story involve a king father's interest in marrying his princess daughter.[4]
Long story short spurraider I can not prove Podesta owns the picture in question, but there are enough other pieces that are highly suspect.
Now on to the next thing that was thrown back in your face the other day. What do you got?
You’ve posted that picture several times throughout the thread and suddenly it’s “oops i don’t think he actually has it”
good job
so he may or may not have art from this lady so let’s find this lady’s most disturbing works and attribute them to podesta
He may very well have it and he got tons of disturbing art work in his house regardless. Who knows what’s in that basement gallery set up to watch “complicated videos”
Any other
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
.jpg)
