And if you read the article I gave, you might be able to understand whether DJohn should rightly exclaim "Lordy", or not.
Its long but really good.
One of the best explanations of the entire collusion v. Conspiracy mess and provides a good chronology.
If people read this, and take it seriously, it would cut down on all the inane retweeting.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...ers-scrambling
The le is misleading as to the more relevant content.
And if you read the article I gave, you might be able to understand whether DJohn should rightly exclaim "Lordy", or not.
Its long but really good.
Pootin/Assange colluding with Trash's mafiya
Trump campaign was offered access to WikiLeaks do ents: report
http://thehill.com/policy/national-s... ents-report
Assange, Wikileaks have been turned by Pootin.
If you read the article I gave, you will see why the above might be completely irrelevant.
Also there is little doubt in my mind if Democrats controlled Congress, Trump would definitely be impeached; the timing would be critical though, as if they wanted to make some charge stick they would have to wait on Mueller. And there is also no doubt in my mind that a number of Republicans would vote to impeach as well.
Extremely rare, and why would the judge recuse himself?
What's the actual rate then?
And what is the source of your theory?
Nobody gives a what you say.
And they never reported it to the FBI
Rick bodying the out of Jr
Lordy i cant get enough!
K.
Everyone Djohn
But your lordy might be interpreted as very relevant.
So just continue to mark on your chalk board when you think you have made TSA, Darrin, Chucko, et al.... look bad.
Forget reality, play a game. It's expected.
Just throwing in actual discussion of the legal state of things and important timelines, don't read it.
Don't know the actual rate and didn't give a theory of my own.
@TheLastRefuse2 post a theory and we'll soon find out if it is correct.
Judge Contreras sits on the foreign intelligence surveillance court.
Judge Contreras signed off on the FISA warrant
Judge Contreras recused himself
No offense taken when Leftist Chris tries. He can't read a box score.
You made a claim it's extremely rare. Quantify that.
I'm asking what the source is for your grand NSA theory.
What is your source?
I was not able to find another instance where a FISC judge recused himself/herself so I stated it was extremely rare. If you have knowledge that FISC judge recusals are common please share.
I told you from the start that I wasn't digging through all of these pages to find a link that you quoted yourself. Your pathetic begging over the last few days has been extremely pathetic.
So you have no evidence it's extremely rare.
What is the source of your grand NSA theory? All you have to do is answer this one simple question. There is no reason for you to dodge it when you accuse others of dodging questions so often.
My evidence was not being able to find any other examples. Is a FISC judge recusing himself common?
The Begging
I can just conclude you didn't really look since you don't do much to support your claims or answer simple questions.
As for this begging business, now any question you ask of anyone will be considered begging. You asked for it, so to speak.
That article says that collusion cases are hard to prove and that other charges are already provable given the evidence we know.
What you fail to grasp is that all the tweeting is the media digesting new information as it is revealed. This is not remotely the full scope of the investigation. The FBI may have other evidence that proves more than obstruction and conspiracy.
Psst. Everyone had access to the emails in July. No super secretey decryption key needed.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)