None of it matters since you won't say anyone actually did anything.
You don't believe it so why should anyone else?
Implicated no, but a very strange coincidence it looks exactly like the two of them. Moving on...are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help her yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
None of it matters since you won't say anyone actually did anything.
You don't believe it so why should anyone else?
No no, let’s make sure we discuss each matter fully. What exactly is the purpose of flashing those sketches? Is it your theory that those drawings represent both John and Tony Podesta? Or is it your representation that a guy or guys who look like them did something bad?
If youre just going to call it a coincidence because it looks like them, then that alone is a non-point. A sketch in another country coincidentally looks like podestas, therefore podestas are engaged in the operation of a child trafficking ring with the aid of Clinton’s and comet ping pong?
i want to hear the specific relevance of you posting those sketch drawings
I just called it a strange coincidence, and I posted them because there were other strange coincidences being found at the time.
Moving on...are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help her yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
Eh, you already admitted all the Silsby stuff is nothing more than innuendo after seven (7) years. Do you have anything to add to your seven-year innuendo?
No no. Is your contention that the sketch photos you have posted here numerous times represent both John and tony podesta
It sure looks like them. Stop stalling. Are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help her yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
Not stalling. Want to thoroughly get through each issue before moving forward. Already did a good jo talking about how the art was bull and the band is meaningless. Want to do the same here.
Who cares if a different person who just happens to look like a podesta did something bad. How does that tie back to the theory that podestas a child sex trafficking ring? Certainly you recognize that such a “connection” would be moronic.
You would only be spamming those those images if you believed the represented the actual podesta brothers, not some lookalike. So is it your claim that
a) John podesta
b) tony podesta
c) both
d) neither, but some unrelated lookalike(s)
were identified in connection with that abduction?
You want to move on to the silsby stuff badly. Let’s work our way through this one and we’ll get there.
you two establish he is disingenuous and deceitful for the 137th time and a few posts later are back to arguing at face value with him.
You are en led to your opinion.
I think it could be c) or d)
And you want to avoid the Silsby stuff badly, but we're here.
Are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help her yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
great. obviously, if its D, then this whole thing is pointless, so lets talk about how it might be C
did you know that the two sketches were of the same suspect? do you really think tony podesta and john podesta are the same person?
also, the suspect was estimated to be between 20 and 40 years old? do you think the one 20-40 year old suspect was john podesta or tony podesta? does either have brown hair?Police have issued two efits that they believe are descriptions of the same man
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...mccann-suspectHe was described by the witnesses as white, aged between 20 and 40, with short brown hair, of medium build, medium height and clean shaven.
was either person even in portugal at the time of this incident?
Yes I was knew that the two sketches were of the same suspect.
No I don't think Tony and John are the same person.
I said it could also be d)---dumb question
The theory for the efits being the Podesta brothers is that law enforcement was creating parallel construction so their being in Portugal at the time is irrelevant.
Moving on...are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help Silsby yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
... if they werent in portugal at the time, then we can conclude that they couldnt be responsible for the girl's abduction, right?
do you think either could be confused as a man from 20-40 with brown hair?
One would think a lawyer would understand parallel construction. At least it's clear you understand stalling.
Are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help her yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
Parallel construction doesn't matter at all for this discussion.
Was either Podesta even in Portugal during the disappearance?
Only matters if you are saying Silsby was smuggling kids to be sex slaves.Are you still claiming Clinton didn’t fly to Haiti to pressure the Haitian government and help her yes or no?
Was Silsby’s lawyer convicted of sex trafficking yes or no?
And you won't dare do that.
In short, you won't accuse anyone you brought up of anything -- so there really is nothing to discuss. It's not that you don't believe your argument -- you don't even have an argument to believe.
There's been an anonymous FBI source that says they were in Portugal staying at a home a third of a mile away.
I haven't seen any other sources confirming or disputing this.
anonymous fbi source good now. As long as nothing to do with mueller
My point was that there has only been one account (to my knowledge) of the Podesta's whereabouts. Nothing to confirm and nothing to contradict.
I would assume it would be easy to prove or disprove their whereabouts.
I have no idea what your mueller comment means.
How does anyone know the source is FBI?
We don't know.
Just saying that it seems like it'd be easy to account for the Podestas whereabouts one way or the other.
Just like it would've been easy for that piece of "journalist" to find out what happened to all the Haitian orphans that were flown to Pittsburgh.
There is a reason people like TSA only stick to innuendo.
You've got to admit that those pics look a ing like one or both of the Podestas.
You've got to admit that on one has ever gone any further than that innuendo.
Whether or not they were in Portugal has no bearing on parallel construction. I don't know if they were in Portugal during the disappearance, do you?
Untrue. Illegally trafficked children are not all sold into sex slavery.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)