right wingers terrified of Mueller.
POLITICAL PROSECUTION: Mueller’s Hit Squad Covered For Clinton And Persecutes Trump Associates
The same bat crazy "news" site that published the following concerning an ammo purchase by the government:
What would be the target of these 174,000 rounds of hollow point bullets? It can't simply be to control demonstrators or rioters. Hollow point bullets are so lethal that the Geneva Convention does not allow their use on the battle field in time of war. Hollow point bullets don't just stop or hurt people, they penetrate the body, spread out, fragment and cause maximum damage to the body's organs. Death often follows.
Potentially each hollow nose bullet represents a dead American. If so, why would the U.S. government want the SSA to kill 174,000 of our citizens, even during a time of civil unrest? Or is the purpose to kill 174,000 of the nation's military and replace them with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) special security forces, forces loyal to the Administration, not to the Cons ution? [The Daily Caller, 8/17/12]
Which of course was pure bovine intestinal residue.
Keep going Chris.
We feel your delusional mind.
And it has the consistency of mush.
Chris back to watchdogging again.
Here’s the really funny part from the NYT article you linked.
“In some ways, the Russian outreach to Ms. Hicks undercuts the idea that the Russian government had established deep ties to the Trump campaign before the election. If it had, Russian officials might have found a better entrče to the White House than unprompted emails to Ms. Hicks.”
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/0...sia-collusion/
It is well known that Russians only try one method of infiltration then they just give up.
the bottom tagline really sells it.
Truth.
There was just one small problem with this story: it was fundamentally false, in the most embarrassing way possible. Hours after CNN broadcast its story – and then hyped it over and over and over – the Washington Post reported that CNN got the key fact of the story wrong.
The email was not dated September 4, as CNN claimed, but rather September 14 – which means it was sent after WikiLeaks had already published access to the DNC emails online. Thus, rather than offering some sort of special access to Trump, “Michael J. Erickson” was simply some random person from the public encouraging the Trump family to look at the publicly available DNC emails that WikiLeaks – as everyone by then already knew – had publicly promoted. In other words, the email was the exact opposite of what CNN presented it as being.
Good do entation of all the bull djohn regularly tries to pass off as truth
https://theintercept.com/2017/06/27/...russia-threat/
Case Closed: FBI says Sessions didn't have to reveal Russia talks
The FBI has put to bed a controversy whipped up by liberal critics of Attorney General Jeff Sessions over his contacts with foreign officials including Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the 2016 presidential campaign.
An FBI email released through the Freedom of Information Act said that Sessions had no obligation to reveal any contacts with foreign officials unless he “developed personal relationships” with them.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ca...rticle/2642982
Holy , you know you have nothing when you're left to citing 6 month old articles.
Not a win, TSA.
Nunes never recused himself from the investigation and was just cleared by the ethics committee. The ethics complaint against him was the left’s attempt to shut down what he was uncovering.
Head of House intelligence panel finds evidence of abuse in US government surveillance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...mpression=true
Why are you getting hunged up on a date? Does that make the story false?
Did Trump Jr. not have contact with wikileaks and was given a description key so he can have access to stolen material that pertained to Hillary Clinton? Did that not happen?
How did that guy even have all those people's personal emails?
Well that's pretty much a white flag from you.
Answer the questions.
He can't neither can Chris or Darrin. Chicken s.
Someone emailed Don Jr a link to WikiLeaks DNC dump that was already published. Lock him up!
I didn’t think you were being serious with those questions
The date means everything. CNN thought they had THE smoking gun. Someone offered Trump Jr a key to access the DNC emails before Wikileaks had released them. This proved the Trump campaign was therefore colluding with Russia via Wikileaks. They had Trump nailed, he was finished, it was over. Problem was the email was sent after Wikileaks had already released the DNC emails.
“The email was not dated September 4, as CNN claimed, but rather September 14 – which means it was sent after WikiLeaks had already published access to the DNC emails online. Thus, rather than offering some sort of special access to Trump, “Michael J. Erickson” was simply some random person from the public encouraging the Trump family to look at the publicly available DNC emails that WikiLeaks – as everyone by then already knew – had publicly promoted. In other words, the email was the exact opposite of what CNN presented it as being.”
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
