Reply With Quote
RIP Nikki Haley or is this fake news?
Go ahead and explain the difference between begging the question and the question you asked me about approving sexual assault.
RIP Nikki Haley or is this fake news?
RIP Nikki Haley or is this fake news?
Isn't one of these your tweeter?
Now wonder you follow so closely.
Is that your subtle way of coming Out?
Isn't one of these your tweeter?
Now wonder you follow so closely.
Good luck in your endeavors.
Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."
BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.
TSA's answer, like the DailyWire article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.
Are you surprised?
Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."
BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.
TSA's answer, like the DailyWire article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.
These are the same people who get their "facts" off of memes and take it as gospel news.
They dont challenge each other on the validity of the source. They take each other words over it.
Trump furious with Nikki Haley after she says his assault accusers ‘should be heard’
House, President Donald Trump did not react well to news that U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley stood up for sexual assault victims during an interview on CBS on Sunday.
The Associated Press reports that “Haley’s comments infuriated the president,
Haley commended the women who have come forward as part of the #MeToo movement, saying, “I’m proud of their strength. I’m proud of their courage.”
“They should be heard, and they should be dealt with. And I think we heard from them before the election. And I think any woman who has felt violated or felt mistreated in any way, they have every right to speak up.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/tru...-heard-report/
The White House’s audacious new lie about the women accusing the president of sexual abuse
There is only one "eyewitness," and his story is a sham.
, the White House claims that the accusations were contradicted “in most cases” by eyewitnesses:
These false claims, totally disputed in most cases by eyewitness accounts, were addressed at length during last year’s campaign, and the American people voiced their judgment by delivering a decisive victory.This is a lie.
The timing and absurdity of these false claims speaks volumes, and the publicity tour that has begun only further confirms the political motives behind them.
Only one “eyewitness” has ever emerged to dispute a claim of sexual assault against Trump. That man, Anthony Gilberthorpe, is a serial fableist with a history of pushing false stories for a few minutes of attention.Gilberthorpe claims that he was in the first-class cabin with Trump and Jessica Leeds during a cross-country flight in 1980. Gilberthorpe presented no actual evidence that he was on the flight, “just his self-described excellent memory.”
He also did not explain why he might have been on a first-class domestic flight in the U.S. as an 18-year-old British boy. He also did not explain why, if he had been on such a flight, he would remember an interaction between Trump and Leeds in which “nothing inappropriate” occurred.
He also claims that Leeds, who was in her 30s at the time, confided in him during the flight that she wanted to marry Trump.
Trump’s eagerness to rely on such an unreliable account suggests he has little information that contradict the allegations against him.
During the campaign, Trump and Mike Pence promised information that would prove all the allegations against Trump are “all categorically false.”
They later confirmed that they were alluding to Gilberthorpe’s story.
https://thinkprogress.org/the-white-houses-audacious-new-lie-about-the-women-accusing-the-president-of-sexual-abuse-fe7187f24282/
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-12-2017 at 11:04 AM.
Meanwhile your facts are taken from knee-jerk articles from desperate journalists who ignore simple things like dates.
Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."
BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.
TSA's answer, like the DailyWire article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.
They seem like a really unbiased organization
https://www.bravenewfilms.org
I just went to their about page and looked up their donors and partners.
Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."
BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.
TSA's answer, like the DailyWire article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.
https://www.bravenewfilms.org/about
Who’s BNF’s largest donor?
Cept Pizzagate is not made up, and show me the 500 plus page Pizzagate thread if you want to make the equivalency all the same.
Eh, what's real about Pizzagate?
I will have to ask you to be specific, considering the thread.
Who said anything about unbiased? Do you believe BNF's liberal bias means the women in this video are lying?
Do you believe BNF put them up to this?
(I bet you won't answer.)
What a happy coincidence that you and DailyWire/Gateway Pundit looked at the BNF "About" page on the same exact day and used one of their funding partners as evidence against the accusers' credibility.
I can't tell from the information I can find. Open Society appears to be one of five top donors contributing at least $200K of their total $2.5MM in 2016 revenue along with the Ford Foundation.Who’s BNF’s largest donor?
If you have better info, feel free to provide it. As it stands it seems like you could have just as easily said BNF is a Ford-funded media company.
As you wish. First let's see if we can pin down "begging the question".
Begging the question is a circular argument that assumes the premise buried in the question itself to confirm the question.
Identify the premise in the question, and then try to state how it is circular:
"What does serial sexual assault say about a man?"
For reference:
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/...g-the-Question
http://www.txstate.edu/philosophy/re...-Question.html
http://www.logicalfallacies.info/pre...-the-question/
If you can't identify a circular argument, why do you think that is?
Trumps a re but where's the sexual harassment part?
she would do anything for campaign contributions. You see what that implies.
That's a big ass leap.
Anything actually includes alot. "She would do anything" generally means one thing.
It shows a perfect example of how poor Darrins reasoning skills are. I have been talking to the human being on the other end of that for years about climage change. For years I have shown him how flawed his reasoning is, in terms of "ad hominem".
Skeptic Darrin accepts Pizzagate Guy's answer because "Soros."
BNF is a Robert Greenwald project that has been around since 2004. Open Society has donated to it, just like they've donated to countless other liberal causes, and they have received donations from people other than Soros.
TSA's answer, like the DailyWire article he probably got his talking points from today, implies that BNF is some kind of Soros media arm. And it fits Darrin's narrative, so naturally he accepts it without question and ignores the actual story here like a good impressionable minion.
"it is wrong because of the source"
When I try to use very simple examples to coax him out of his Dunning-Kruger effect haze, he acts like he can't read.
Example:
"An umbrella salesman, says that it is forecast to rain today, so therefore it will not rain, because he has a motive to lie".
What the forecast says about the rain is a fact that exists outside of who claims it. What is actually important is the claim itself.
This has been explained to him repeatedly, yet he still thinks it works, as in this case.
It is fine to apply a bit of extra skepticism, where appropriate. But Darrin keeps running back to arguments like this, like a dog to vomit. It is sad to see someone so enslaved to bad thinking.
Uh...no it doesn't. It's a pretty a common phrase. And in most cases, normal people don't infer sex.
The fact that you think it implies sex makes you pretty creepy.
So most people go around saying "she would do anything" without anything being infered from that. Sure. Naive boy.
You have to know the context in which the question is asked.
1. You claim person X sexually assaulted person Y because person Y said so.
2. I challenge the veracity of the claim of Person Y
3. You ask what sexual assault says about person X
Your question infers person X sexually assaulted someone. Since we haven't established sexual assault happened, the question about what it means about a person is either A) moot or B) begging the question
I gave you benefit of the doubt that you wouldn't ask a moot question. Ergo you are begging the question. If you'd like to change that to "moot", that's ok.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
