How’s this for context
“In one exchange from August 2016, the FBI’s Lisa Page forwarded a Donald Trump-related article to Peter Strzok, writing: “And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace.”
He responded: “Thanks. It’s absolutely true that we’re both very fortunate. And of course I’ll try and approach it that way. I just know it will be tough at times. I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps.’”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...at-menace.html
they get elected president, apparently
Wow you got me. The man behind the curtain. BOOM!
A game we can both play.
BTW, I haven't watched the hearing yet but from the highlights I've seen, Rosenstein once again shut it down, per par when he was pressed about Mueller.
You just gotta live with the fact he's not going anywhere and then live with whatever the findings are.
That applies to me if Mueller finds nothing too.
Damn, TSA with the goods today.![]()
Intent to what?
them all but yeah, sessions has been sitting on his ass and i'd like to believe the conspiracy theorists out there that believe sessions is working behind the scenes. i am just not seeing him do anything except oppose marijuana like it's the 1930's all over again.
just intent!!
dammit man
what do you want sessions to do?
open back up the HRC investigation since it is falling apart right in front of our eyes.
Is this the game called post an irrelevant tweet to the quoted article?
The article is about your boy Schiff possibly being set up and exposed as a leaker by a government sting.
Of course Fox would say there "has to be more", must be some red-meat conspiracy Fox can fabricate then hype as Bible truth for weeks
Intent to tweet?
Use your words, TSA.
Oh is it? I didn't click on it.
I thought you were arguing about that FBI guy still.
Good luck with Schiff.![]()
What's the penalty for that?
He thinks they're all going to jail.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)