Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[monosylab1k]

[Chris]

But...but...but Roy Moore!


(see:whataboutism section 121)

[dabom]

But...but...but Roy Moore!


(see:whataboutism section 121)

Do you know what that means now?

[Pavlov]

But...but...but Roy Moore!


(see:whataboutism section 121)

Well you seem to be avoiding him like the plague today.

Besides, I asked you a direct question --

How was the investigation rigged, Chris?

Well?

[monosylab1k]

But...but...but Roy Moore!


(see:whataboutism section 121)

i have no clue what the you were talking about so whataboutism doesn’t apply. You’re just a ing pussy who went into hiding after your boy Moore got sent to the Tree Of Woe.

[Chris]

Well you seem to be avoiding him like the plague today.

Besides, I asked you a direct question --



Well?

Maybe it should be investigated so we can find out Pavlov. That was a direct response.

[Pavlov]

Maybe it should be investigated so we can find out Pavlov. That was a direct response.

That doesn't answer the question. You believe it was rigged.

How?

[DarrinS]

Speaking of leaks....

That’s a fair point. There’s a lot of shady going on.

[Chris]

i have no clue You’re just a ing pussy

Today's Liberal. SAD!

[Chris]

That doesn't answer the question. You believe it was rigged.

How?

WRONG. You didn't like the answer so you press the button again. There's a word for that Pavlov.

[Pavlov]

That’s a fair point. There’s a lot of shady going on.

I mean Fox got 2600% more information than a congressional investigation.

Plumber TSA has got to be flipping out.

[Pavlov]

WRONG. You didn't like the answer so you press the button again. There's a word for that Pavlov.

So you don't think it was rigged?

Oh.

[monosylab1k]

Today's Liberal. SAD!

[AaronY]

Today's Liberal. SAD!

[TSA]

Fusion DoJ
It’s getting hard to tell where the Clinton campaign ends and the federal law enforcement apparatus begins.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fus...mpression=true

[spurraider21]

Fusion DoJ
It’s getting hard to tell where the Clinton campaign ends and the federal law enforcement apparatus begins.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fus...mpression=true

did you read the full article?

[Pavlov]

did you read the full article?

[dabom]

[TSA]

did you read the full article?

I don’t think Mueller should resign.

Is your only takeaway from the article that the author thinks Mueller should resign?

[spurraider21]

I don’t think Mueller should resign.

Is your only takeaway from the article that the author thinks Mueller should resign?

i asked if you read the full article

[TSA]

i asked if you read the full article

Always do.

Is your only takeaway from the article that the author thinks Mueller should resign?

[spurraider21]

Always do.

Is your only takeaway from the article that the author thinks Mueller should resign?

honestly, i'm paywalled.

since you aren't (evidenced by the fact that you read the full article), would you be a doll and paste it here or in a pm?

[TSA]

honestly, i'm paywalled.

since you aren't (evidenced by the fact that you read the full article), would you be a doll and paste it here or in a pm?

your question makes since now

[spurraider21]

your question makes since now

thanks

just read it. the author definitely said mueller should resign for conflicts on interest... yet didnt really explain his conflict of interest

also next to nothing in there about the "clinton campaign" except that an acting cia director who was not involved in the investigation endorsed clinton. its a nice clickbait le. fake news if you ask dmc

[Pavlov]

thanks

just read it. the author definitely said mueller should resign for conflicts on interest... yet didnt really explain his conflict of interest

Seems the WSJ has a requirement to call for Mueller to resign every few days. No reasoning needed.