Reply With Quote
You're still stalling.
Collusion for what purpose?
Obstruction for what purpose?
Maybe you could just answer the questions.
So, a comprehension issue. Got it.
You're still stalling.
Collusion for what purpose?
Obstruction for what purpose?
Maybe you could just answer the questions.
You think you're the organ grinder, I'm not the monkey. You don't answer a question with a question and expect me to answer yours. You can keep with the stalling all you like, but you've a question to answer first.
Great.
My answer is if we're going to use your loaded characterizations, it depends on what purpose the collusion and obstruction is for.
What was the purpose of this collusion and obstruction, Chucho?
Not prosecuting a Hezbollah drug cartel doing loads of business here and abroad to make the Iran nuke deal, Pavlov.
While making pals with Syria, Russia and Iran.
Thanks, you were halfway honest there.
Explain.Thanks, you were halfway honest there.
I suppose I can be accused of not wording my question carefully enough.
The overall goal was the nuclear deal. When eight governments are involved there are going to be compromises.
Were the goal unduly influencing the US elections, I'd probably feel differently.
Obama Administration Will Be Formally Investigated for 'Potentially Criminal' Act Involving Hezbollah, Iran
Lawmakers are reportedly launching an investigation into former President Barack Obama’s alleged protection of Hezbollah in order to safeguard his controversial Iran deal.
Multiple congressional insiders told the Washington Free Beacon on Wednesday that lawmakers will investigate the undermining of a decade-long Drug Enforcement Administration initiative — “Project Cassandra” — that tracked the Iran-backed terror group’s trafficking of drugs and weapons, money laundering, and other criminal activities.
The potential investigation comes just one day after Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-NC) called for a probe into the matter.
The report, originally published by Politico, suggested the Obama White House put a series of roadblocks in front of the DEA’s efforts, hoping to avoid any conflict with Iran, which could have jeopardized the nuclear deal.
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) said he and other top politicians are looking into evidence that could implicate high-ranking former Obama staffers, including National Security Council official Ben Rhodes, who helmed much of the negotiation over the Iran deal:
“I’ve long believed that the Obama administration could not have done any more to bend over backwards to appease the Iranian regime, yet news that the Obama administration killed the investigation into a billion dollar drug ring that lined the terrorist group Hezbollah’s pockets in order to save its coveted Iran deal may very well take the cake.
Hezbollah is a brutal terrorist group with American blood on its hands and it would be unconscionable for American policy to deliberately empower such a nefarious group.”
And Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) told the Beacon he is not surprised by the report “alleging the Obama administration turned a blind eye and allowed Hezbollah to pump drugs into the United States to fund its terror campaigns in the Middle East.”
“Congress needs to investigate this report and do what the Obama administration refused to do — severely increase pressure on Hezbollah and hold the terrorist group, and its benefactor Iran, accountable for their crimes,” he added.
David Asher, a former illicit finance analyst for the Department of Defense, said the Obama administration “serially ripped apart this entire effort that was very well supported and resourced, and it was done from the top down.”
In the immediate aftermath of the stunning report — which received hardly any mainstream media coverage — Israeli politician Yair Lapid called on the former president to return his Nobel Peace Prize.
https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017...ezbollah-iran/
Today's sperm shielder.
You didn't comment on the actual story either.
Proves my point.
And what is your point? (Besides the implicit sperm shielding.)
That is the point, dumbass. Nothing implicit about it.
Still no comment on the actual story....
why would somebody click your ty link, if you ain't gonna bother to simply copy and paste why should anybody else care
Might be took long for one post tbh. I actually prefer to click the link to give the reputable sites traffic.
Now we know more about the Trump adm. pulling closer to Israel than Obama. Hezbollah is an absolute pain to Israel. No shortage of cash for rockets from Gaza into Israel I guess. It's not smart losing conduits of intell into these groups.
It is interesting to note however, that Trump declaration on Jerusalem has now got both Sunnis and Shiites pissed off at us. This was not the proper response to anything. Everytime you think the situation in the ME is a huge mess you get humbled and shown its an enormous mess with few easy solutions.
We will never know for sure how hard Obama could have pushed Iran on the deal to quit funding Hezbollah. The fact that they were getting cash thru drugs as well is interesting, but makes sense.
So, that triggers you. (And yea, your sperm shielding was implicit. There was nothing stopping you from regarding the content of the article / the subject; but you don't want to face it.)
You're only here for me.
Actually I had already read it. It is an interesting from muddying the waters even more with the ME and Iran's intentions. People keep screaming about Russia in Syria when Iran has more human material on the ground. Iran and Russia may run into some disagreement about dealing with Assad ( who's puppet?) and Syria. Huge mess.
You did read the article, and this the best you could put forth.
, you didn't even comment on the actual story.
Still haven't.
feigned outrage
Congratulations for expressing a political opinion for the first time.
Thanks, you were halfway honest there.
You're only here for me.
More than you did, since you didn't read the article at all and are only here for me.
You should repost all your posts from this thread -- that'll show me!
Don't call out mah spamming / sperm shielding
Pavlov
Why was it so important that Obama make a nuclear deal with Iran in the first place? Thoughts? Seems to me there was no compelling need to sanction their activities.
See? You haven't posted one thing about the article you didn't read.
And the only reason you ever would is because I just shamed you.
lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
