like you're hard to find in the threads.
So you want Iran to have nuclear weapons.
OK.
like you're hard to find in the threads.
As hard as it is to make you angry.
I don't want a crime-ridden third world country to have any nuclear capabilities. Why do you think that's a good idea?
Then you answered your own question, though your characterization of Iran may be a bit off.
Happy to help you decide what you believe.![]()
That's a terrible dodge (and I'm being generous to even call it a dodge). Why are you okay with Iran having nuclear capabilities?
I'm not, you idiot.
Do you even know what the agreement is?
List the basics.
Don't patronize me, . Why are you okay with Iran having nuclear capabilities?
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Again.
Read something.
Don't want to answer the question / sperm shielding. Check.
Next: If Hezbollah is a huge world crime syndicate (rooted in islamo-terrorist dogma), then why would Obama want to strike an accord with "moderate elements" in Hezbollah?
Nope, first you have to explain why my support of the current agreement to prevent the development of Iranian nuclear weapons means I am for Iran's having nuclear weapons.
I await your explanation.
Thanks in advance.
Below...
Last edited by Spurtacular; 12-20-2017 at 09:08 PM.
I said nuclear capabilities, not nuclear weapons.
Now that that "first" is taken care of, tell me why Obama would want to come to terms with "moderate" elements in Hezbolla.
They already had nuclear capabilities.
Damn, you really don't know anything.
Did I ever say they didn't have nuclear capabilities? You keep talking like a backpedaling ignorant ass. So, why would Obama be okay with Iran having nuclear capabilities?
You're acting like taking away all Iran's nuclear capabilities without going to war with them was/is an option.
That's funny.
I never "acted" any such way. I ask, why is Obama okay with Iran having nuclear capabilities? Answer the question instead of putting forth contrived narratives.
Nothing short of war would lead to an Iran with no nuclear capabilities at all.
So, your position is that kowtowing to a hostile, homicidal actor and allow for them to have nuclear capabilities was a wise idea?
They already had nuclear capabilities. What are you saying he should have done to completely eliminate them?
This was not in dispute. What was the wisdom of sanctioning their nuclear capabilities?
What are you saying he should have done to completely eliminate them?
I did not speak one way or another on completely eliminating them. What is the wisdom in sanctioning Iran's nuclear capabilities?
What are you saying Obama should have done?
Spit it out.
I am saying Obama should not have sanctioned Iran's nuclear capabilities. What is your wisdom for saying he should have done so?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)