Lol Roy Moore's a pedo! And he'll still win (cuz Alabama)

[DMC]

I didn’t interject. I answered a direct question. I’m not ignorant of facts. I simply misstated and corrected my statement and the local pedant’s request. Do you want me to reference specific regulations trump overturned that I believe will be harmful to the environment?

You had to issue a retraction because, in your haste to show how Trump has failed, you fast forwarded through time to your speculated outcome and called it fact. I reeled you back in and you had to admit it's just your wild ass guess based on fear.

[Th'Pusher]

You had to issue a retraction because, in your haste to show how Trump has failed, you fast forwarded through time to your speculated outcome and called it fact. I reeled you back in and you had to admit it's just your wild ass guess based on fear.

Not based on fear. Based on environmental regulations he has already rolled back or is in the process of rolling back.

[Spurtacular]

Not based on fear. Based on environmental regulations he has already rolled back or is in the process of rolling back.

Tell us about the environmental calamities coming our way cos of Trump.

[Th'Pusher]

Tell us about the environmental calamities coming our way cos of Trump.

I never claimed environmental calamities. I claimed that I thought the deregulation would be counterproductive.

http://environment.law.harvard.edu/P...LBACK-TRACKER/

Most of these are a wet kiss to industry.

[AaronY]

You had to issue a retraction because, in your haste to show how Trump has failed, you fast forwarded through time to your speculated outcome and called it fact. I reeled you back in and you had to admit it's just your wild ass guess based on fear.

Do you actually like Bernie or just think he would win? Because based on his statements and his debate with Cruz he's a full on socialist who understands economics about as well as Chris understands vagina. Would be surprised if you thought his government as Santa Claus bull was intelligent

[Spurtacular]

I never claimed environmental calamities. I claimed that I thought the deregulation would be counterproductive.

http://environment.law.harvard.edu/P...LBACK-TRACKER/

Most of these are a wet kiss to industry.

So, you don't have a whole lot; just sounds good to say.

[DMC]

Do you actually like Bernie or just think he would win? Because based on his statements and his debate with Cruz he's a full on socialist who understands economics about as well as Chris understands vagina. Would be surprised if you thought his government as Santa Claus bull was intelligent

Bernie is an old socialist . I don't dislike him personally but his idea for government is unsustainable and the fact that he's as close to broke as I am tells me he's not the most financially savvy investor. Either way, he ran on the DNC ticket and so did Hillary, so let's not keep deflecting from the focal point which is Hillary. If she's the tiest candidate, how valuable in the realm of government is the collective education levels of her voters?

[DMC]

Do you actually like Bernie or just think he would win? Because based on his statements and his debate with Cruz he's a full on socialist who understands economics about as well as Chris understands vagina. Would be surprised if you thought his government as Santa Claus bull was intelligent

double post ..

[Th'Pusher]

So, you don't have a whole lot; just sounds good to say.

Do I really have to explain why I believe eliminating a rule that, for example, regulates the discharge of arsenic, lead, Mercury into the environment would be counterproductive to the environment?

[DMC]

Not based on fear. Based on environmental regulations he has already rolled back or is in the process of rolling back.

That you've seen no results of to say good/bad. Ergo - fear.

[Th'Pusher]

Bernie is an old socialist . I don't dislike him personally but his idea for government is unsustainable and the fact that he's as close to broke as I am tells me he's not the most financially savvy investor. Either way, he ran on the DNC ticket and so did Hillary, so let's not keep deflecting from the focal point which is Hillary. If she's the tiest candidate, how valuable in the realm of government is the collective education levels of her voters?

73.009%.

[Spurtacular]

Do I really have to explain why I believe eliminating a rule that, for example, regulates the discharge of arsenic, lead, Mercury into the environment would be counterproductive to the environment?

You don't; but this is the first I'm hearing you say that. Of course, voting Hillary wasn't going to stop that either. You're relying on fear politics.

[Th'Pusher]

You don't; but this is the first I'm hearing you say that. Of course, voting Hillary wasn't going to stop that either. You're relying on fear politics.

I don't think HRC would have rolled back the environmental regulation like Trump has. And this isn't fear politics. These are actual regulations trump has rolled back since becoming president.

[Th'Pusher]

That you've seen no results of to say good/bad. Ergo - fear.

like you can't predict the effects of removing a regulation. As if there wasn't a measurable state prior to the regulation being implemented.

[DMC]

Do I really have to explain why I believe eliminating a rule that, for example, regulates the discharge of arsenic, lead, Mercury into the environment would be counterproductive to the environment?

It only regulates us doing it.

[DMC]

like you can't predict the effects of removing a regulation. As if there wasn't a measurable state prior to the regulation being implemented.

I don't need to predict anything. I generally avoid making matter-of-fact statements using prognostication.

[DMC]

73.009%.

Let me know when I get to 98.1%

[Th'Pusher]

I don't need to predict anything. I generally avoid making matter-of-fact statements using prognostication.

You said:

That you've seen no results of to say good/bad. Ergo - fear.

An inaccurate statement.

There was a result prior to the regulation being implemented. Predicting the result of removing the regulation is not fear, it’s logical.

[DMC]

You said:



An inaccurate statement.

There was a result prior to the regulation being implemented. Predicting the result of removing the regulation is not fear, it’s logical.

Then why did you say "likely"?

[Th'Pusher]

Then why did you say "likely"?

Because it’s a prediction.

[DMC]

Because it’s a prediction.

Exactly.

You don't understand the concept of "results" if you think you can see them before the changes.

I'm not arguing for or against it, but I'm not predicting something based on confirmation bias (thus didn't need to issue a retraction).

[Th'Pusher]

Exactly.

a prediction based on logic, not fear.

[DMC]

a prediction based on logic, not fear.

Based on confirmation bias unless you can show the premises that you used to come to the conclusion.

[Th'Pusher]

Based on confirmation bias unless you can show the premises that you used to come to the conclusion.

So it’s not fear as you initially stated? Now it’s confirmation bias?

spinning like a top

[DMC]

So it’s not fear as you initially stated? Now it’s confirmation bias?

spinning like a top

not understanding confirmation bias

Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.

So you cannot show your logic?

Or are you confusing "sensible" with "logical"?