Reply With Quote
NFC is stronger at the bottom than at the top at the moment. I could see Atlanta making the SB winning 3 games on the road: in LA, in Philly, at Minny.
Keep it in the political forum, got.
NFC is stronger at the bottom than at the top at the moment. I could see Atlanta making the SB winning 3 games on the road: in LA, in Philly, at Minny.
Don't make fun of my pedophile.
Triggered snowflake.
I can't. They're too error prone. Errors aren't a luxury for the road team.
Hilarious. I bet you're a real hit at social gatherings.
Triggered snowflake.
I bet you're a big fat slob at any gathering.
And it takes a real got to be triggered by a joke, so GFY to be honest.
alright Colin Kaepernick
You triggered as , bro.
How does it feel to be a person who ruins things that people enjoy with political nonsense?
Dip .
Saints grind through a tough NFC but fall to the Pats 27-21
No it's not .
Even if you take Wentz and Philly out of the equation, the Vikings, Rams, and Saints clearly separate themselves from the likes of Carolina, Atlanta, and Seattle. If you think this current Falcons team is good enough to win 3 games on the road, then you haven't been watching them. Their offense has been barely above average all season and the defense isn't good enough to compensate. You thought Seattle would go into Atlanta last season to knock them off for some silly reason even though Atlanta was clearly better.
Vikes - 27
Pats - 17
No love for Baltimore? Has a 2012 feeling to it with the veteran D and peaking O.
Ravens 28
Saints 24
Homer pick I know.
4-4 road team that will have to win 3 road games to make the superbowl against 3 good teams. not happening
They were 4-4 on the road in 2012 as well. Do you really think 2012's home game against Indy vs the potential road game against KC/SD is really that big of a difference?
Packers were 3-5 on the road in 2010.
I like the Ravens getting to the second round and to me are the team with the best shot to win at NE.
I'm getting more of a 2014 vibe from them, tbh. Assuming they make the playoffs, you can pencil them in for a win in the WC round. They'll scare the out of somebody in the divisional round, but I can't see them beating either possible opponent.
That Cincy game on Sunday is no gimme though.
They were two dropped INTs away from just "scaring the " out of Denver in 2012. Flacco gave that game away twice and the Broncos gave it back. I don't know if I really see a difference between that and the silly/heart-breaking ways they lost to NE in 2014 and 2011. Just a bounce of a ball or a missed assignment in each. They do lack a Boldin-esque guy, though. Wallace has come on strong, but he's more of a better Torrey than another Q. Too bad SSSr had to get injured and retire.
You're right about the Bengals game. Baltimore loses to them on the regular to end the season (even did it in 2012). In fact, they would have made the playoffs in 2015 had they not lost to Cinci to end the season, though that was only because the rest of the perfect storm ended up happening.
Yeah right. The Panthers have far more impressive victories over the Vikings and Patriots than the Saints had all year. How about you win the division first, asswipe, before you start putting the Saints in the same category as Carolina. As a matter of fact, I'm sure that we will kick your ass next week. I don't see a division rival winning three straight in a year, especially in the playoffs.
Baltimore maybe playing better than anyone right now; but having to win at Pittsburgh / at New England is a tall order.
Steelers 17
Vikings 24
Hometown crowd noise just too much for Old Ben on his last ditch final drive to try and tie the game.
If NE gets #1, I think they go to pittsburgh. Chargers beat the Jags round 1 will give the cheatriots a huge fight and hopefully win in new cheatland.
Scam sure looked good today, huh?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
