Reply With Quote
DMC changed the subject already.No ?
"Has issued" indicates recency. Otherwise, it should say "issued in March 2017"
...
"Has issued indicates recently"
Has issued indicates past tense.
FBI Executes...
indicates present
DMC changed the subject already.No ?
"Has issued" indicates recency. Otherwise, it should say "issued in March 2017"
...
"Has issued indicates recently"
Has issued indicates past tense.
Recency isn't the same as "recently". Don't misquote me.
So you are worried more about being misquoted than being wrong. Makes sense.
"Don't misquote me man
Thread le, dumb ass.
FBI executes search warrant.
Yeah, in March 2017.
It should say "FBI Executed a Search Warrant"
it's called "present perfect" and it's being used with a past participle "issued". It indicates that an event occurred that is still in play, and the timing is unspecified (though it's right there in the do ent).
The present perfect tense refers to an action or state that either occurred at an indefinite time in the past (e.g., we have talked before) or began in the past and continued to the present time
Learn English. It's apparent what they thought they had (and what you thought you had) despite all the semen shielding from the liberal left here.
your own Boutons...
"Has issued indicates recency". Christ!
Who knew thread les could trigger DMC
Lordy can't even indicate what tense "Has Issued" indicates. At some point you've got to feel bad for this er. Spending his days getting upset over online thread les.
But yeah. Not being able to understand "has issued", confirms he was in the military.
I showed you twice already. Do you need sources? It's present perfect used with a past participle, which indicates either:
A. Unknown time of occurrence
B. Still in play
Since neither is true, the correct usage would be "issued". Using "has issued" is common when something recently happened and the story is developing. "Has unsealed" would be more accurate, if it was true.
Keep multiposting your scattered thoughts. It's amusing to watch you squirm.
I hope you realize you defeated your whole point by admitting "unknown time of occurrence". The phrase "has issued" cannot refer to both recency and unknown time of occurrence.
March 7, 2017
The present perfect tense refers to an action or state that either occurred at an indefinite time in the past (e.g., we have talked before) or began in the past and continued to the present time (e.g., he has grown impatient over the last hour). This tense is formed by have/has + the past participle.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/present-perfect-tense/
Just stop already.
Jesus ing Christ both of those statements both say the event began in the past, moron.
DMC posting he doesn't even understand
Everything that happened, anywhere and always, is in the past.
The "indefinite time" is the key. The time is known. "Continued to the present time" is the key in the 2nd option, only it didn't.
So there you are. Keep being intentionally naive though.
Has issued does not continue to the present time. So what the are you trying to argue
Argue with the grammar website.Has issued does not continue to the present time.
What are you trying to argue?
how can you say "has issued" indicates recency if it indicates more than one time?
A continuation isn't "more than one time"
The case was closed 2 months after it was opened.
NBC is a sitcom producer, quite appropriately so.
"Or occurred at an indefinite time in the past." That indicates two different times by your own definition.
And btw. "Has issued" is past tense. Occurs at a set point in the past and cannot continue. Nothing about that phrase says recency.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions