Reply With Quote
Its been hours. Why hasn't anybody confirmed Nunes' story? "I believe"resisting the huge L
I have no problem with any of this being investigated AT ALL -- you're the one ting your pants over any tiny piece of evidence, dossier funding and classification of memos.
Its been hours. Why hasn't anybody confirmed Nunes' story? "I believe"
So nobody has confirmed it. Not even the DOJ
Btw, Nunes is a proven liar. This looks like an about face.
No. The Steele dossier funding isn’t up for debate.
“After Mr. Trump secured the nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the D.N.C. by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to compile research about Mr. Trump, his businesses and associates — including possible connections with Russia. It was at that point that Fusion GPS hired Mr. Steele, who has deep sourcing in Russia, to gather information.”
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/10/2...ww.google.com/
Fair enough. Depending on who hired who when.
Can you rule out the possibility that Steele might have been given information from previous research efforts to better brief him as to what to look for?
And TSA says it has no bearing on it's veracity so we should definitely keep talking about the funding.
Oh, I'm pretty sure the germ of the idea to call Steele was Simpson's reading the Post's report about Trump's ties to Russia.
I am inclined to believe Nunes in this case.
I can't wait for him to try and drag FBI agents in front of Congress. Not a way to win friends and influence people.
Just like I can't wait for Trump to try going after pot dispensaries. More self-inflicted -stepping on the part of Republicans.
Q says the army will do that when martial law is declared.
Yes giddy.
I have no problem with any of this being investigated AT ALL -- you're the one ting your pants over any tiny piece of evidence, dossier funding and classification of memos.
You were spamming this last night and so excited they were going over Nunes head. You even called it a BOOM
It BOOM’d alright, just the exact opposite of what you hoped for.
That makes a lot of sense given Steele's background. That I do believe.
Seems that Steele's work was funded by Democratic election officials, not the Republican party. John probably misread/remembered the NYTimes article I referenced.
All of which mattersexcept for someone desperate for a win.
It was big news. I made no predictions about what would come of it.Yes giddy.
You were spamming this last night and so excited they were going over Nunes head. You even called it a BOOM
It BOOM’d alright, just the exact opposite of what you hoped for.
You REALLY have a problem figuring out what a prediction is.
I have no problem with any of this being investigated AT ALL -- you're the one ting your pants over any tiny piece of evidence, dossier funding and classification of memos.
What has Nunes been proven to have lied about?
"Q" is that the book of Q thing?
Euyuch, I will have to wade into another Alex Jones inspired fanfic, if I want to find out.
The only thing TSA has now are technicalities. He just said the funding doesn't matter except when he wants it to matter.That makes a lot of sense given Steele's background. That I do believe.
Seems that Steele's work was funded by Democratic election officials, not the Republican party. John probably misread/remembered the NYTimes article I referenced.
All of which matters
Here you go just making up again. I never said you made any predictions.It was big news. I made no predictions about what would come of it.
You REALLY have a problem figuring out what a prediction is.
I have no problem with any of this being investigated AT ALL -- you're the one ting your pants over any tiny piece of evidence, dossier funding and classification of memos.
I have no problem with any of this being investigated AT ALL -- you're the one ting your pants over any tiny piece of evidence, dossier funding and classification of memos.
Q has been confirmed to be in Trump’s circle.
By whom?
You?
4chan?
ar15.com
Give us a link to the proof.
Damn. So he doesn't even care about the funding.
I have no problem with any of this being investigated AT ALL -- you're the one ting your pants over any tiny piece of evidence, dossier funding and classification of memos.
Except when he does.
i like when Q saying "blunt and direct time" was translated as him having predicted an attempted terror attack from a bangladeshi immigrant
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)
Posting Permissions
