Did you watch this one at least before you posted it?
Is this the number of times you ed your mom or something?!?!
Leave me alone!
Spurtacular has the most posts of anyone on a thread of a movie she hates and hasn't seen.
Having 20 more posts than the second guy and about twice that amount that of the OP of the thread.
Kylo Ren needs his own movie where he finds this fat, self-absorbed, small- tied, hideous soul mate who has a body like a baby seal, then she treats him like , then he gets even more emo, then he comes out of it a better Kylo and gets an attractive chick at the end of it.
I don't know how I feel about the movie tbh. It was okay. Not as different as some make it out to be. I felt it pretty straight forward with a lot of the same story elements from ESB and ROTJ. The only part that surprised me was that they killed Snoke so quickly, which makes me think he isn't really dead.
Kylo Ren is confusing the out of me though. He's the opposite of Anikan in that he's dark side struggling with his light side. But when you think he's finally given in (when he kills Snoke), he goes full on bag. Otherwise, I like the idea that balance lies in the middle, and that dark and light are going to have to come together.
Spurtacular has the most posts of anyone on a thread of a movie she hates and hasn't seen.
Having 20 more posts than the second guy and about twice that amount that of the OP of the thread.
He dead, bro.
Killing Snoke for any other reason than not wanting an innocent (Rey) to get killed IE benevolence doesn't make sense. He knew it would be very risky in the first place in that if Snoke caught him he'd be dead and that in he'd have to kill like eight other jedis after the fact right there. It's not a good calculated risk whatsoever. But then he's willing to kill Rey after she doesn't go along with him. But this is merely plot hole #497.
I also hope they discuss who the Snoke really was and where his resources came from for the 1st Order.
Making up a back story after the fact is that appealing to you?
It's what they have always done.
...yeah, that was a pretty bad ing take. The first three films did this with almost every main character.
No way Snoke is really dead. Probably some way he learned how to beat death.
Last edited by djohn2oo8; 01-06-2018 at 10:54 AM.
Spurtacular will be on here talking about how lame the new Han Solo backstory movie was each of the three times he saw it in theaters
He'll be in a wheelchair maybe
Make that 72.
Rent free.
No, you paid in full
So much autism. Perhaps you should stop blurting out expressions that you can't use in the correct context.
Glad I'm not the only one who notices that .
i guess everyone loves B-rated movies with a B-rated cast as long as they are riddled with cgi, puppets, and a sjw agenda to them.
You are an F-Rated poster
oh why so "worked up"? lmao... so "worked up" over nothing. yall trolls get so damn "worked up".
btw, mad i am right about that franchise? ing nerd.
I did use it in the right context. Given that I'm living rent free in your head, I found no need to explain it. But since you've embarrassed yourself further, I'll throw a dog a bone. I just asked the guy if he cared about a backstory of someone no longer in play; I never argued if it had been done before. You then came in crying on a false premise and making false claims.
RENT FREE, .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
