Reply With Quote
Its a bunch of nothing bro
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...eted-33000-em/
They had nothing in them just like all the other ones the hackers took without her knowledge and which showed nothing
You're conflating events. I just read about that, which is why I know he was speaking of 60K e-mails in total and that some had naturally been deleted in the course of time. He was not speaking of the 33 K e-mails that were deleted after they were court ordered to be preserved. So, we agree that this felonies; destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice? Or do you have any more lies you'd like to tell me?
Its a bunch of nothing bro
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...eted-33000-em/
They had nothing in them just like all the other ones the hackers took without her knowledge and which showed nothing
That's not what we were debating just now. Is deleting 33K e-mails that are court ordered to be preserved a crime?
Yes or no.
"However, the implication — that Clinton deleted emails relevant to the subpoena in order to avoid scrutiny — is unprovable if not flat wrong.
The FBI’s investigation did find several thousand emails among those deleted that were work-related and should have been turned over to the State Department. However, FBI Director James Comey said in a July 2016 statement that the FBI investigation "found no evidence that any of the additional work-related emails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.""
priceisrightlosinghorn.mkv
"Comey added in a later congressional hearing that the FBI learned no one on Clinton’s staff specifically asked the employee to delete the emails following the New York Times story and subpoena. Rather, the employee made that decision on his own."
priceisrightlosinghorn.mkv
That's not an answer to the question. Do you think it's a crime to delete e-mails that have been court ordered to be preserved?
Yes or no.
If they were inadvertently deleted no. And if anyone committed a crime it was the employee who deleted them w/o clinton's knowledge. It doesn't matter anyway since you're are going to believe she's a criminal to you and you'll keep saying that just like you did in that one thread even when you couldn't name a crime despite being asked 75 times to name one lol
Okay. Is it a crime to non-inadvertently delete e-mails that have been court ordered to be preserved?
Yes or no.
Start with the premise that shes evil and work backwards lol
Then mock anyone or anything that contradicts it as being naive or lies lol. Hope this continues honestly my premise of this being like Carter supporters sticking Nixon in Reagan's face in 1980 is gonna look pretty prescient if we get a good candidate then. Lol no one will give two s outside of the hardcore re thats watched 13 hours a hundred times and cried while the terrorists fired slo mo bullets into the American flag
I'm not mocking anything, or I haven't been for some # of posts.
Is it a crime to non-inadvertently delete e-mails that have been court ordered to be preserved?
Yes or no.
Yes, if this happened it would be a crime. Evidence was it didn't happen which is what I showed you. Ergo no crime.
You were disputing the nature of the e-mails, not whether or not they had been deleted contrary a court order. You seriously bull about stuff that was just written. Ergo, given that there was a court order to preserve the e-mails and that they were not inadvertently deleted, a crime has occurred.
Nixon was a really, really good, and truly progressive President. He'd be a Demo God by today's Demo beliefs.
Dude started the EPA tbh. Policy wise I don't hate him. his problem was he was paranoid if he had just said "some dumb s on my team broke into that hotel without anyone asking them to" could have just skated plus he took LBJ's advice about recording everything which was re ed
AaronY
What evidence do you have to suggest/prove that e-mails were not deleted while under court order to be preserved? I'm calling you on your bull . You have no evidence in that regard.
Bro, the employee Comey questioned said he deleted them because they looked unimportant and I backed that up by saying nothing the Russians found was really important which makes it plausible.
"The employee's" reason doesn't have a damn ing thing to do with deleting them while under court order. There is no leeway when it comes to a court order to preserve evidence. You don't have to be a first year law student to get this. But now having this explained to you, did a crime occur?
Yes or no.
You'd have to prove he was lying.
Or you could do the re strategy of assuming the Clintons must be evil then rolling your eyes and mocking anyone who doesn't connect the re dots like you and Chris do
Hillary Clinton was legally bound to preserve the e-mails. A crime occurred in the non-preservation of those e-mails. The only thing that can be question is what party or parties are ultimately liable for breaking the court order.
Don't think memes are accepted in a court of law lol
"Your honor what I'd like to do is talk directly to the jury. Mock them and call them sheeple over and over. Then roll my eyes a bunch of times when they ask for direct evidence and post memes. I have no real evidence maybe I can lock up that one intern for deleting emails on his own but I know she should be locked up so I'm going to be mean and condescending to the jury till they throw her in jail if you'll allow it"
"Your honor I'd like permission to call juror #7 a re over and over until he breaks if you'll allow it"
Dude committed treason to get elected.
Oh, are you done taking your recess, then?
You do understand that a crime(s) was unequivocally committed?
So you're going to lock up the employee who deleted the emails?
Pretty anticlimactic tbh.
The employee should be charged if he is going to obstruct the investigation. He should be looking at facing maximum jail time unless he wants to cut a deal and give up the bigger fish in this. That's how this routinely works.
Give them up for what? You just said the employee committed the crime.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
