Reply With Quote
You claiming it’s full of probablys and likelys just shows you didn’t read it.
I’m still waiting on my security clearances to have access to the classified do ents Grassley is referring to.
You claiming it’s full of probablys and likelys just shows you didn’t read it.
This referral does not pertain to the veracity of claims contained in the dossier. The referral is for further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime.
Six likelys tbh.
This referral does not pertain to the veracity of claims contained in the dossier. The referral is for further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime.
Lordy!
Still trying to figure out how this is just like Three Days of the Condor like "sundance" says. Maybe dude just really, really likes Robert Redford.
Not sure why you find that funny or why you think Steele didn’t lie to the FBI about something other than the dossier.This referral does not pertain to the veracity of claims contained in the dossier. The referral is for further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime.
"I don't take lightly making a referral for criminal investigation," Grassley said in a statement Friday. "But, as I would with any credible evidence of a crime unearthed in the course of our investigations, I feel obliged to pass that information along to the Justice Department for appropriate review. Everyone needs to follow the law and be truthful in their interactions with the FBI."
"Maybe there is some innocent explanation for the inconsistencies we have seen," Grassley continued, "but it seems unlikely."
Did you finally read it tbh?Six likelys tbh.
I think it has to do with the dossier because Grassley says it has to do with the dossier.
Attached please find a classified memorandum related to certain communications between Christopher Steele and multiple U.S. news outlets regarding the so-called “Trump dossier” that Mr. Steele compiled on behalf of Fusion GPS for the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee and also provided to the FBI.
This is why I think it's likely you don't actually read anything.
It's full of likelys tbh.
Exchanged pleasantries? Holy e! Mueller gonna tear her ass up.
I think Steele lied to the FBI about his contacts with the media or being directed by Fusion GPS to contact the media.
Please list them.
So that does have to do with the dossier and what does that change?
I did read it. That’s why I was able to call bull on your claim of it being full of probablys and likelys.So that does have to do with the dossier and what does that change?
List all the likelys you claim the article is full of.
There are six likelys. If you free to count and list them yourself.
It doesn’t change anything. The issue is whether or not Steele lied to the FBI about anything.
If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?
Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?
I'm glad we agree. One has to wonder why you jump all over these stories.
Would six likelys in an article of that size be an article full of likelys yes or no?
Yes.
Damn, that was easy.
Dodge #1
The issue is whether or not Steele lied to the FBI about anything.
If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?
Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?
Lying is easy for you.
Sorry, I've already said investigate everything -- as opposed to you.
If you want Steele to go to jail because he impugned your Dear Leader, just say so. Your thirst for justice only applies to opponents of your Dear Leader. That isn't' justice at all.
It's full of likelys, sundance. You can't change that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
