Tranny defense/recap; no basis in reality.![]()
It's not the questioning. it's the simple idiots who can't answer a question.
Tranny defense/recap; no basis in reality.![]()
This was what I was talking about with you just randomly jumping into like a nitwit, btw.
But secondly, there's no checkmate in that picture.
Today's cuck / chumpette.
^Desperation.Constantly having to be on the defense because he's so ty.
That's the point, genius.
Well considering that defense was slapping a upside the head n' all.
Today's tranny / chumpette
now spurtacular doens't understand chuck norris memes
what do you mean he swims on land, that's impossible
![]()
chump ain't no chuck norris.
Still not getting it.
Sure, tranny.
I can see why blake got cucked so easily if he compares chump to chuck norris though.
Doubling down on not getting it.
Now incorrectly using Chuck Norris memes to compare Blake and Chump.
![]()
If Blake had the Chuck Norris arms Chump's developed over years of chronic spanking, he could have socked the dude who his old lady found more adequate straight to and back.
It's not a distraction. Dishonesty, whether legal or not, is still dishonesty. Trump can legally send the spec ops into areas and start . Doesn't make it honest bidding, just legal.
it absolutely is a distraction.
trump does something questionable and is facing scrutiny? BUT CLINTON AND DNC COLLUDED
whataboutism
i mean look at this thread. trump russia? NO JUST LOOK AT CLINTON DNC PIZZA
I'm surprised they set the board up correctly but IRL good guys wear black, Chuck never needs to open in order to win in 1 move.
From a photographer standpoint, you'd not see the black pieces against Chuck's shirt.
Chuck is such a badass.
Scrutiny != illegal. No one here gives two s whether or not Trump broke a law except how it registers on their scoreboard.
you're changing the topic. my claim is that CLINTON DNC!! is a distraction, and a well that the right keeps going to every time they face a little heat
Where does the "little heat" come from? Some neutral 3rd party? No. It comes from the left. Get your house in order first. That's old wisdom. You'd know if you ever spent a day.
irrelevant who or where it comes from. hillary always comes down as the responding distraction.
its no surprise you keep trying to change the conversation.
It's not irrelevant just because you say it is. If this was a formal debate and you were making a clinical observation, that's fine, but it's not and you're not. The lot of you are scoreboarding with almost zero concern for legalities. You just hope to have a win in the end. Because of that, and how some of you on the lunatic fringe seem to think even a freckle on the ass of a republican is worth debasing, then it is relevant.
The left has no right to cast dispersion on the right (and vice versa) when they turn a blind eye to the trespasses of their own party.
Don't point at my spots with your dirty finger.
It's a conversation you folks want to run away from because Hillary went from your champion to your flowers in the attic. Not to worry, I will keep reminding you she's up there.
98.1% Philo
i say its irrelevant because the question wasn't: "what is 'hillary' distracting FROM"
the question was: "is 'hillary' a distraction"
the answer to that question is not in any way impacted by what you are being distracted from.
omg you edited your post, let me make a big stink about that
/dmc
i've answered plenty of his questions just to be asked the same bs over and over again or see him asking another poster the same garbage line of questioning. it's def a shtick.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)