Reply With Quote
lol walls of text
Can't you ever just say something?
"not to my recollection" and "generally not how we frame" projects.
That is a "no" by any reasonable interpretation.
lol walls of text
Can't you ever just say something?
No ing thank you.
Let me know when the OIG looks into pizza-gate.
... says the guy trying to distract and deflect about the President of the United States colluding with a hostile foreign government to win office, and actively ignoring the massive conflicts of interest by that same corrupt president.
no it isn't
Isn't Mike Rogers retiring soon?
Yup. And he'll be able to testify freely as a US citizen.
TSA 2017: I can't wait for Simpson's testimony!
TSA 2018: I'm going to avoid talking about the most significant parts of Simpson's testimony!
Will probably be the same with Rogers -- if he even testifies anywhere.
This is a good prep for what the OIG is about to reveal. You can only keep your head in the sand for so long.No ing thank you.
Let me know when the OIG looks into pizza-gate.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...tional-crisis/
lol sundance
Do you ever tire of lying?
lol no rebuttal
How did Pizzagate work out for you? Did Hillary have Seth Rich murdered?
It's what you're doing, TSA. Too bad for you.
It's just another wall of text. I already dealt with operation Condor and its likelys. You melted down over it.
You did the same with pizzagate and told us all to get ready for that too.
lol
Do you?
Worked out great. More human trafficking arrests in 2017 than any other year in history.
Seth Rich case is still unsolved so who put the hit on him still TBD.
If I lied as much as Chumpdumper I suppose I would.
So you were wrong. Again.
That's not what you were on about.
Why do you lie so much, TSA?
You didn’t offer a single rebuttal to the article. You were called out and admitted your false claim of it being full of likelys.
The details and facts scare you so I understand why you don’t want to discuss those, so let’s sddress the 6 likelys you found. Post them here and we’ll discuss.
It is full of likelys.
And again -- I am completely fine with any investigation. They just never turn out the way you want them to.
Which is hilarious.
Half of this thread is you being wrong
Six likelys in an article that long is not an article full of likelys. Agree to disagree.
Post up the 6 likelys you took issue with and let’s address them.
Don't have to. My point was it's full of likelys and those are the kinds of things you always take as gospel.
Like pizzagate.
lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
