Reply With Quote
It's ok she has "no recollection" and it was "a joke".
You do know that Hillary has verified that this subject was discussed in one of her meetings and that she didn't speak against it, right?
It's ok she has "no recollection" and it was "a joke".
I was trying to break it to him softly
It's being reported that the reason Ecuador wants him out of the embassy is because he has "poor personal hygiene" and is stinking the place up. Many people are also saying this.
If they try and move him, and the U.K. gets a hold of him.... Expect to see him in a courtroom in the US. Then behind bars until he gets a trial.
Absolutely.
Shilery awcknowledgd that statement but sqid she was “joking”
at the liberal snowflake neocons
she didn't verify
and she never acknowledged the statement. she said she doesnt remember making such statement, but IF she did, it would have been a joke
keep making up tho (while ironically complaining about fake news)
i mean, maybe she did say it, but to say "she acknowledged/verified it" is just bull . the only "confirmation" is from an anonymous source
she didn't verify
and she never acknowledged the statement. she said she doesnt remember making such statement, but IF she did, it would have been a joke
keep making up tho (while ironically complaining about fake news)
i mean, maybe she did say it, but to say "she acknowledged/verified it" is just bull . the only "confirmation" is from an anonymous source
. The love from people s astounding folks
Lets pray Lord Assange will find his way out of Devil Sams tentacles
Even the Young Turks weren't sperm shielding like you're doing, tbh.she didn't verify
and she never acknowledged the statement. she said she doesnt remember making such statement, but IF she did, it would have been a joke
keep making up tho (while ironically complaining about fake news)
i mean, maybe she did say it, but to say "she acknowledged/verified it" is just bull . the only "confirmation" is from an anonymous source
Pavlov
The New York Times are alegit media outlet?
Yes or no.
You approve of the Obama presidency?
Yes or no.
You never answered my question yes or no.
Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that? Also your Social Security number.
Yes or no.
Last edited by Pavlov; 01-13-2018 at 10:53 AM.
The New York Times are alegit media outlet?
Yes or no.
You approve of the Obama presidency?
Yes or no.
You never answered my question yes or no. I'll answer right after you answer the question I asked first.
Now, if your name address and full medical record were taken without your knowledge or consent and published on a website for everyone to see like Assange did with these people, would you approve of that? Also your Social Security number.
Yes or no.
I would not approve of my name, medical records or ss# being published without my consent.
The New York Times are alegit media outlet?
Yes or no.
You approve of the Obama presidency?
Yes or no.
So it's a no. You disapprove of what Assange did.
Yes and yes. To my knowledge either has intentionally published such information without any reason. You can correct me if I'm wrong.The New York Times are alegit media outlet?
Yes or no.
You approve of the Obama presidency?
Yes or no.
I can correct you on your (very) poor logic. Wikileaks certainly has reasons.
What reasons do they have for posting medical records with identifying information and social security numbers?
Explain.
Cant blame assange for concentrating on Devil Sam tbqh
There is only one country that wants his head on a stick at all costs and it aint Russia
Also only one of those countries have invaded/bombed/turtured dozens of countries around the world in the last 20 years
You sure about that?
"Can't we just drone him?" - Hillary Clinton
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions