Former Clinton Staffers Jump To Mccain

[Pavlov]

Look at you throwing a tantrum ploy even though I said at the outset that this would not be prosecuted.
Numbers are "rumor and innuendo."

You made the accusation.

Back it up or back down.

[Spurtacular]

You made the accusation.

Back it up or back down.

I posted the tweet that backs it up. This has triggered you very badly.

[Pavlov]

I posted the tweet that backs it up.

Nope, that makes the allegation.

Averages and medians don't prove a federal case.

Try again, counselor.

[Spurtacular]

Nope, that makes the allegation.

Averages and medians don't prove a federal case.

Try again, counselor.

Oh, you want me to go citizen journalist and prove a federal case?

I think the indicator is there. Hillary grossly pays men more. I don't see any justification on the horizon for this champion of women. Do you?

[Pavlov]

Oh, you want me to go citizen journalist and prove a federal case?

I think the indicator is there. Hillary grossly pays men more. I don't see any justification on the horizon for this champion of women. Do you?

You just admitted you can't prove your allegation so there's no reason to believe your allegation.

[Spurtacular]

You just admitted you can't prove your allegation so there's no reason to believe your allegation.

The veracity of the allegation is not in question. You're just sperm shielding for Hillary as usual.

[Pavlov]

The veracity of the allegation is not in question.

Of course it is.

I questioned it and you folded.

[Spurtacular]

But muh feelings

....

The claim/data against Clinton is huge and damning. If you have something to show that the veracity of the claim is in question, show it. Your feelings don't count, snowflake.

[Chris]

[Pavlov]

....

The claim/data against Clinton is huge and damning. If you have something to show that the veracity of the claim is in question, show it. Your feelings don't count, snowflake.

I did.

I questioned your claim and you couldn't prove it.

QED

[Spurtacular]

I did.

I questioned your claim and you couldn't prove it.

QED

You've showed me nothing to state that the veracity of the claim is in question. Your feelings don't count, snowflake.

[Chris]

I did.

I questioned your claim and you couldn't prove it.

QED

Legally speaking he doesn't have to prove anything.

[Pavlov]

You've showed me nothing to state that the veracity of the claim is in question.

I stated the veracity of the claim is in question because I questioned it.

When I did, you admitted you couldn't prove it.

The only feelings involved are yours.

QED

[Pavlov]

Legally speaking he doesn't have to prove anything.

Well, he made a legal charge he admitted he can't prove.

[Spurtacular]

I stated the veracity of the claim is in question because I questioned it.

When I did, you admitted you couldn't prove it.

The only feelings involved are yours.

QED

No, I said that I would not be taking it to federal case / citizen journalist levels to support the solid information that has already been presented. Now, if you have something to show that the veracity of the claim is in question, then go for it. But again, your feelings don't count, snowflake.

[Pavlov]

No, I said that I would not be taking it to federal case / citizen journalist levels to support the solid information that has already been presented.

The information is not solid. No case has ever been made on such information.

[Spurtacular]

The information is not solid. No case has ever been made on such information.

What are you talking about? Wikileaks presented "the case." You just don't like damning info; you triggered, brah.

[Pavlov]

What are you talking about? Wikileaks presented "the case."

exactly

[Chris]

Hillary did nothing wrong! Dindunuffin!

[Spurtacular]

exactly

Exactly. Wikileaks presented damning evidence and shat all over your feelings.

[Pavlov]

Exactly. Wikileaks presented damning evidence and shat all over your feelings.

it's not damning evidence, no matter your delicate feelings about Clinton.

[Spurtacular]

[Spurtacular]

it's not damning evidence, no matter your delicate feelings about Clinton.

You cannot say that it is not unless you are willing to present something to the contrary other than your feelings, snowflake.

[Pavlov]

Wow.

February.

[Pavlov]

You cannot say that it is not unless you are willing to present something to the contrary other than your feelings, snowflake.

I don't have to. I didn't charge them with breaking federal law.

You did.

Your burden of proof.

Your feelings.