Reply With Quote
I must have mistaken your laughing along with him and never once calling out the stupidity of it while immediately asking me to support something I posted in a different thread as you supporting the Tea Pain theory.
I must have mistaken your laughing along with him and never once calling out the stupidity of it while immediately asking me to support something I posted in a different thread as you supporting the Tea Pain theory.
I know how the arrest fits into his conspiracy theory.
You refuse to explain how it fits into yours.
He is not a pussy.
You are a pussy.
Explain how Mike Flynn was involved in all of this with Rosatom yet Obama still signed off on his full natsec clearance in 2016?
you're trying to make this my theory.
It is not my theory.
Now, how does that arrest fit in your conspiracy theory?
I asked you here and when you stalled I asked you in the Uranium One thread.
So just answer a straightforward question for once.
I will respond to the arrest in the proper thread. You said you understand how it fits into djohns conspiracy, so explain how Mike Flynn was involved in all of this with Rosatom yet Obama still signed off on his full natsec clearance in 2016?
It is not my theory.
Now, how does that arrest fit in your conspiracy theory?
I asked you here and when you stalled I asked you in the Uranium One thread.
So just answer a straightforward question for once.
When? Next week? After sundance posts something? What's the holdup?
You said you understand how it fits into djohns conspiracy, so explain how Mike Flynn was involved in all of this with Rosatom yet Obama still signed off on his full natsec clearance in 2016?
It is not my conspiracy theory.
Try again.
You can’t discuss something unless it’s “your” conspiracy theory?When? Next week? After sundance posts something? What's the holdup?
It is not my conspiracy theory.
Try again.
In Tea Pain’s conspiracy theory, explain how Mike Flynn was involved in all of this with Rosatom yet Obama still signed off on his full natsec clearance in 2016.
It's not my practice to represent a theory that is not mine when the person who posted it is still in this thread, TSA.
You ed up thinking it was my theory. Don't double down.
Tea Pain isn’t in this thread your pussy excuse doesn’t cut it.
In Tea Pain’s conspiracy theory, explain how Mike Flynn was involved in all of this with Rosatom yet Obama still signed off on his full natsec clearance in 2016.
You're totally losing it.
You’re embarrassing yourself
Lordy!
You're totally losing it.
You already did thinking it was my conspiracy theory -- now you're just tripling down on it demanding I explain it when the person who posted it just mocked you too.
You already did thinking it was my conspiracy theory -- now you're just tripling down on it demanding I explain it when the person who posted it just mocked you too.
Uranium one blowing up in his face
explain how Mike Flynn was involved in all of this with Rosatom yet Obama still signed off on his full natsec clearance in 2016.
I wasn’t aware posters could not discuss theories posted by other members.You already did thinking it was my conspiracy theory -- now you're just tripling down on it demanding I explain it when the person who posted it just mocked you too.
Sticking to these new guidelines I’ll only ask you to discuss things I’ve personally posted.
“FBI gave raw Section 702–acquired information to a private en y that was not a federal agency and whose personnel were not sufficiently supervised by a federal agency for compliance minimization procedures.”-pg 83
https://www.scribd.com/do ent/3495...itical-Enemies
If you had to take a guess looking at the dates provided which private en y do you think the FISC named as having access to raw section 702 with no oversight?
Flynn! lordy!
Congrats on finding your 2018 Louise Mensch
That wasn't what I said, but damn you're really whining hard today.
Why didn't you just ask djohn about what he posted? Would've saved you a lot of embarrassment.
Dunno. I don't see the need to speculate. If you want to spread some innuendo about Fusion GPS, you already did that.“FBI gave raw Section 702–acquired information to a private en y that was not a federal agency and whose personnel were not sufficiently supervised by a federal agency for compliance minimization procedures.”-pg 83
https://www.scribd.com/do ent/3495...itical-Enemies
If you had to take a guess looking at the dates provided which private en y do you think the FISC named as having access to raw section 702 with no oversight?
As for the Siegalman conspiracy theory, I suppose it's easy to pile on Flynn because he was convicted of lying to the FBI and worked as a foreign agent without registering as one.
He is proved to be a criminal liar, so thinking he lied in the past isn't that much of a stretch tbh.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
