Former Clinton Staffers Jump To Mccain

[Spurtacular]

But.. but.. It didn't just happen.

Did you grow up wanting to be a sperm shielder?

[Spurtacular]

I don't have to. I didn't charge them with breaking federal law.

You did.

Your burden of proof.

Your feelings.

This ain't a courtroom, . The tweet speaks for itself. Do you have something to the contrary other than your feelings, snowflake?

[Pavlov]

Did you grow up wanting to be a sperm shielder?

Why did you post that anyway?

Explain yourself.

[Pavlov]

This ain't a courtroom, . The tweet speaks for itself. Do you have something to the contrary other than your feelings, snowflake?

It's your claim that you didn't prove.

You have nothing but your feelings, snowflake.

[Spurtacular]

Why did you post that anyway?

Explain yourself.

Tangent interest.

"Explain yourself."

[Pavlov]

Tangent

For no reason.

OK.

[Chris]

Rothschild? The family that has been funding both sides of every major war since the French Revolution? Globalists in bed with Hillary? No way!

[Spurtacular]

It's your claim that you didn't prove.

You have nothing but your feelings, snowflake.

And if I were a prosecutor and you were a defense attorney, your line of thinking might mean something other than sperm shielding.

[Pavlov]

Rothschild? The family that has been funding both sides of every major war since the French Revolution? Globalists in bed with Hillary? No way!

What's your definition of a globalist, Chris?

[Spurtacular]

For no reason.

OK.

Tangent is not no reason. You triggered as .

[Pavlov]

And if I were a prosecutor and you were a defense attorney, your line of thinking might mean something other than sperm shielding.

Nope, we don't have to be attorneys for you to fail utterly in proving a claim.

You fail all the time here.

[Pavlov]

Tangent is not no reason. You triggered as .

Triggered is searching for ten year old threads to bump.

[Spurtacular]

Nope, we don't have to be attorneys for you to fail utterly in proving a claim.

You fail all the time here.

I never set out to prove a case. Why you insist on being a got like this in every thread? You do realize it's sperm shielding, right?

[Pavlov]

I never set out to prove a case.

Of course not. You admitted you couldn't prove it.

Yet another failure.

[Spurtacular]

Of course not. You admitted you couldn't prove it.

Yet another failure.

Is this forum a courtroom?

Check no.

Okay, then. So, now that we've thrown out your sperm shielding argumentation, go ahead and show something that throws the tweet into question. Again, your feelings don't count, snowflake.

[Pavlov]

Is this forum a courtroom?

Claims can be made anywhere.

You can fail to prove a claim anywhere.

[Spurtacular]

Claims can be made anywhere.

You can fail to prove a claim anywhere.

What is your reason for disputing the claim? (Because clearly you have no information contrary to the claim).

Triggered or sperm shielding or both?

[Pavlov]

What is your reason for disputing the claim?

Neither you nor they proved the claim.

QED

[Spurtacular]

Neither you nor they proved the claim.

QED

What is your reason for disputing the claim if you don't have any info to the contrary?

[Pavlov]

What is your reason for disputing the claim if you don't have any info to the contrary?

When I see what looks like a bull claim, I will often ask for someone to prove it.

You admitted you couldn't prove your bull claim.

It's your failure. I do enjoy watching you fail.

[Spurtacular]

When I see what looks like a bull claim, I will often ask for someone to prove it.

You admitted you couldn't prove your bull claim.

It's your failure. I do enjoy watching you fail.

Wow, it went from "looks like a bull claim" to "your bull claim" in the very next sentence. Glad we could establish you're triggered. And given your history it is also established that you're sperm shielding pretty hard for Hillary.

It's your failure. I do enjoy watching you fail.

[Pavlov]

Wow, it went from "looks like a bull claim" to "your bull claim" in the very next sentence. Glad we could establish you're triggered. And given your history it is also established that you're sperm shielding pretty hard for Hillary.

It looked like a bull claim

I asked you to prove what looked like a bull claim.

You failed to prove what looked like a bull claim.

I concluded what looked like a bull claim is indeed a bull claim after your abject failure to prove it.

Now you're just a big ball of feelings about it.

[Chris]

When I see what looks like a bull claim, I will often ask for someone to prove it.

You admitted you couldn't prove your bull claim.

It's your failure. I do enjoy watching you fail.

The burden of proof is on the accuser tough guy. Legally speaking.

[Pavlov]

The burden of proof is on the accuser tough guy. Legally speaking.

Exactly. Spurtacular made a legal claim against Hillary Clinton.

That sure didn't go the way you wanted, did it?

[Chris]

When I see what looks like a bull claim, I will often ask for someone to prove it.