Reply With Quote
Right. Spurtacular made the legal claim against Clinton.
What part of that are you not getting?
Well you're citing the absence of evidence as proving a negative as you'd say. You love that concept except when you don't.It looked like a bull claim
I asked you to prove what looked like a bull claim.
You failed to prove what looked like a bull claim.
I concluded what looked like a bull claim is indeed a bull claim after your abject failure to prove it.
Now you're just a big ball of feelings about it.
But how could it be an "abject failure to prove it" if I never set out to prove it? Therefore, your "bull " conclusion is bull and you're just triggered as I said.
Oh, this has been apparent for awhile, but....
Right. Spurtacular made the legal claim against Clinton.
What part of that are you not getting?
No I am citing your failure to prove the claim as your failure to prove your claim.
Don't bleed your feelings all over it. You just failed.
Well, you've claimed it was a "bull claim." What evidence do you have to support that? By your own standard, you must prove it.
Your failure is my proof.
Thanks for the confirmation!
That's not evidence. That's conjecture, counselor.
Your failure is my proof.
Thanks for the confirmation!
I love to treat this board like a courtroom, 'cept when I don't.
Your failure is all the proof I need.
Thanks for failing!
You're just running on pure emotion right now.
Actually, the point that I "proved" is that you're running on pure emotion (triggered). And now you cannot "prove" your counter claim either.
You're just running on pure emotion right now.
Sorry, you completely failed to prove your claim. Your complete failure is proof your claim is bull .
And there's not a thing you can do about it.
You have claimed something contrary to my original claim IE a counter claim. It's obvious that you've hit a wall. Or in other words, CHECKMATE.
that's all they run on... emotion... their feelings!
Your claim is bull .
My proof of that is your complete failure to prove your claim.
What part of that do you not understand?
boohoo pav... ask some more merrygoround line of questions.
Show some more emotion.
Your proof (that my claim is bull ) is that I did not prove a claim that I quite clearly stated I would not be proving.
show? like visually? almost as funny as you claiming i'm oh so emo. i have very little emotion unless on psychedelics. ha
Indeed you did not.
That's your failure.
Congratulations.
Like verbally.
You're the most emotional poster here.
Don't fight it.
Your failure.
oh verbally, like audio or face to face? notice how ing re ed you are yet pav?
That would be proof that I have not proved my claim. It would not be proof that my claim is bull . This isn't hard stuff, head.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions