so basically from now on, any time TSA posts an article or tweet, remember that he himself doesn't believe any of it
spurraider21 above is an example of someone not reading past the headline.
“Dana Boente, the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who is acting head of the Justice Department’s national security division, has been selected to be the FBI’s next general counsel, according to three people familiar with the matter. He replaces James Baker, who was reassigned late last year.
Boente is a veteran federal prosecutor who has led multiple U.S. attorneys’ offices around the country and has risen to prominence in a variety of acting roles in the Trump administration. When President Trump fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates over her refusal to defend his travel ban, Boente took over and said he would defend the measure.
When Jeff Sessions was sworn in to the job, Boente became the deputy attorney general, and after that, the head of the national security division.
Boente’s move to the FBI is notable because some might view him as a Trump loyalist who has shown himself willing to go along with the president’s controversial agenda, and he now might be able to advocate the president’s position inside an ins ution that is supposed to enjoy independence. Because he is a political appointee, he will have to clear some hurdles before taking a career position. Boente, though, is a respected law enforcement figure who has not been overtly political. He was appointed as a U.S. attorney under President Barack Obama.“
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.880d728ad17f
dwrong2oo8
so basically from now on, any time TSA posts an article or tweet, remember that he himself doesn't believe any of it
honestly i have no clue if you actually endorse this position or not unless you explicitly say so and mark with an e-signature and have it co-signed by a notary public
You’re good at searching people’s posting history...why haven’t you posted the post where I say “IF” Fusion GPS is the private contractor? Or does that just up the false narrative you’ve wasted your time on this afternoon?
another victim of oozing butthurt![]()
Negative.
He got canned because he was an "Obama holdover."
Wray is not a Trumpie and neither was Boente. Wray hiring him back is telling Trump and Sessions to go eat .
Sessions fired Boente and he's supposed to be a Trump guy.You're laughable TSA.
honestly, whether or not you endorse a position appears to change on a post by post basis.
it was literally today you claimed you "shut me up" about pizzagate by posting all the evidence while minutes earlier having said that you never actually believed pizzagate because it was just a conspiracy of all conspiracies
tbh its impossible to tell if you actually believe im a victim of butthurt
The forum fence sitter lecturing others on endorsing a position![]()
I will ammend my post. He was not fired.
He resigned.
http://www.newsweek.com/dana-boente-...igation-720389“President Trump’s reported demand for his resignation, the sudden nature of its timing, its proximity to the indictments issued by special counsel Mueller and reported connections between the U.S. attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Virginia and the investigations of Paul Manafort and [former National Security Adviser] Michael Flynn, leave me concerned that this resignation was not business as usual,” he wrote. “I cannot take on faith that this dismissal was normal or justified.”
Fact remain however is that Boente was not wanted in his previous role.
You have more honor than most admitting you were wrong about Boente.
Unfortunately you were wrong about Wray as well.
It would serve you well to watch the entire hearing. Wray is in place to clean house at the FBI.
“We have to asses what else might need to be done to unring that bell if you will.”
He was in essence fired. TSA.
CROFL. Wray is tight with Comey. And will uphold the law. TSA wrong again. TSA cares not about the law.
Maybe you need a reminder of what he said in his confirmation hearing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.7431efd6fc8f
Juxtapose that with:
https://www.axios.com/scoop-15166613...0894ca6a7.html
Looks like the man is following through with his pledge.
He hasn’t been asked to drop any investigation. What are you trying to say?
And again, watch the hearing with Wray discussing the OIG investigation, his answers are telling. Wray is Trump’s guy and will be shoulder to shoulder with him exposing the corruption. I hold out hope Comey was a white hat who helped Mueller have an avenue to assemble a team of traitors for the IG to monitor and investigate. Don’t forget Trump met with Mueller the night before Mueller was named special counsel.
My fault. I know you dont read past article les so I should have quoted the imporant and pertinent quote.
This one as an extra.Wray’s promise to resign before yielding to such pressure appeared to satisfy Republicans and Democrats that he would assert his independence on the job.
Like I said earlier. He's not going to do Trump's dirty work for him. He was willing to resign along with Comey and McCabe.Comey also identified the officials who were prepared to resign over the issue.
“Knowing those people, and that they were hardly shrinking violets in the war on terror, there was no hesi*ta*tion in my standing with them,” Wray said. He said he told Comey to let him know if they were about to resign, “and I’ll resign with you.”
Kyle G and dijohn still convinced it was ze Russians![]()
“my gut sense and concern is there’s no big there there.” - brilliant![]()
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)