Reply With Quote
ching chong bing bong
perry's smokers are flapping out of control again.
ching chong bing bong
Wray doesn't have to do anything unethical or illegal to be "Trump's guy". Wray can follow the rule of the law and still be Trump's guy. This is why your bet is stupid, it makes no sense.
I've got a very simple bet for you.
$100
Russia investigation (you) vs OIG/HPSCI investigation (me)
investigation that yields the most serious conviction wins.
Wray is one of the good guys. If it is the same guy I was thinking about, Obama did some slick moves in getting him shuffled before Trump took office, which the amateurs in the Trump camp took to mean that Obama effed him over so he would have a grudge. Trump's dumbass staff then put him in charge without realizing he wasn't a bought/paid for loyalist, but an actual patriot who gives a about what is right/wrong.
Seems to leave out the possibility of plea bargains. Still this will be funny to watch.
FIFY. Wray is one of the good guys, and he's shoulder to shoulder with Trump.
While you've been steadily beating your muh Russia drum the IG has been quietly working in the background investigating the investigators. Wray is on board and ready to take action on ANY findings coming from the IG.
Listen carefully to his answers at the oversight hearing.
No reason to include plea bargains as they are used to convict a bigger fish.
Is that sundance?
‘This guy’s busted’: Morning Joe says Mueller has ‘smoking gun’ evidence of Trump obstruction on tape
Special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating whether President Donald Trump intended to obstruct justice in the Russia probe, but a “Morning Joe” panel found the evidence hilariously obvious.
A new report by NBC News shows the White House concluded in late winter that Mike Flynn had lied to FBI agents, which means Trump was aware his former national security adviser was in legal jeopardy when he fired FBI director James Comey on May 9.
But MSNBC’s Ari Melber said
Trump had already publicly confessed to firing Comey over his handling of the Russia probe during a May 11 interview with NBC News.
“Isn’t the funny part here that we also have tapes but they were made by Lester Holt?” Melber said.
“I mean the president said something on TV that if it were a secret tape, if we found the secret tape of him saying,
‘Russia was on my mind when I fired the FBI director.’
It would actually look worse, but it just all happened live.”
those nationally broadcast recordings would be potentially damning if they had been revealed another way, and Himes agreed other Trump campaign associates — including his family members — had also signaled corrupt intentions.
“Don Jr. in meeting, you know, in his Trump Tower meeting where he’s looking and excited of getting dirt about Hillary Clinton, it was all about the e-mails,” Himes said, laughing.
“Maybe they’re not tapes, but we live in a world with a lot more evidence.”
Host Joe Scarborough said Mueller had two other key pieces of evidence already on the public record from the week Trump fired Comey.
“Sarah Huckabee Sanders’ statement the next day, where
she says he wanted to finish the investigation so he got rid of him, you’ve got intent from that White House statement,”
Scarborough said.
“Finally, the smoking gun of all smoking guns, the
White House released a conversation between Donald Trump and the Russian foreign minister and the Russian ambassador to the United States
and congressman, you got the president of the United States saying,
‘Hey, I got the pressure off, this guy is a real nut job. I fired him, so now the pressure is off on this investigation.’
So guess what? Donald Trump colluding with the government of the two people that were inside that Oval Office.”
Brzezinski said Trump’s statement to NBC News could hardly be more clear evidence of intent.
“Trump (is) on tape going,
‘Look, I am going to obstruct justice, okay?'” she said. “‘Everybody listen — Lester, are you rolling? I am going to obstruct justice.'”
Scarborough said the admission was
the type of evidence prosecutors dream of finding.
he did it in plain sight,
he admitted it in plain sight with Lester Holt,
with the Russian foreign minister,
with the Russian ambassador of the United States, and
then had his White House spokesperson do it.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/guy...e+Raw+Story%29
so, Trash is busted as coverupper, but why did Trash and his mafiya LIE repeatedly, "forget" repeatedly, to COVERUP?
What business (es) was/were so bad that the entire group covered up?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-24-2018 at 04:21 PM.
Just wanted to post on page 666
Brilliant move by Grassley and Graham. DOJ is forced to reconcile the differences in Steele's London testimony and what the FBI presented. They were never going after Steele criminally, they were going after the FBI.
"Well, in the course of our review, Senator Graham and I came across some information that just does not add up. We saw Mr. Steele swearing one thing in a public libel suit against him in London. Then we saw contradictory things in do ents that I am not going to talk about in an open setting. And from everything we’ve learned so far, we believe these discrepancies are significant. So, we sent a referral of Christopher Steele to the Justice Department and the FBI for potential violations of 18 USC 1001.
Now, I guess people are going to say whatever they want to say about it, no matter what the facts are. But it doesn’t contribute anything meaningful to the public debate to ignore those facts or to speculate—wrongly—about Senator Graham’s motivations, or mine.
First, despite all the hubbub, this is not all that unusual. Anyone can ask for a criminal investigation. I have done it in the past when I’ve come across potential crimes in the course of my oversight work. And I have done so publicly. This situation is no different.
Second, as the Special Counsel has reminded us all recently, lying to a federal official is a crime. It doesn’t matter who is doing the lying. Politics should have nothing to do with it."
and just about every other page in this thread, tbh
you have 965 posts in this thread
Who told you this 6453D chess move?
for those keeping score, here's everyone with 100 or more posts:
Who Posted?
- Posts 4,415 djohn2oo8
- Posts 2,860 TSA
- Posts 2,004 Pavlov
- Posts 1,318 Reck
- Posts 1,249 boutons_deux
- Posts 965 DarrinS
- Posts 939 RandomGuy
- Posts 938 Chris
- Posts 750 spurraider21
- Posts 408 baseline bum
- Posts 383 Thread
- Posts 340 pgardn
- Posts 267 Adam Lambert
- Posts 263 clambake
- Posts 261 FuzzyLumpkins
- Posts 242 Spurminator
- Posts 205 monosylab1k
- Posts 186 AaronY
- Posts 178 koriwhat
- Posts 174 Chucho
- Posts 155 dabom
- Posts 128 Splits
- Posts 104 hater
- Posts 102 TheSanityAnnex
FBI Official: FBI Agents Threatened Physical Harm to President Trump In Missing FBI Texts & Other “Frightening” Communications
“This is much larger than just texts between two FBI agents.”
A high-ranking FBI official confirms a number of the missing 50,000 FBI text messages — as well as other text and email messages among FBI brass — reportedly discussed initiating physical harm to President Donald Trump.
The FBI official urged the U.S. Department of Homeland Security — which oversees the U.S. Secret Service — to launch an investigation of the Justice Department, the FBI and all text messages missing and otherwise that threatened the President.
“This is dangerous territory and all FBI text messages and personal phones should be examined,” the official said. “It would reveal some frightening conversations.”
Did FBI brass discuss the assassination of President Donald Trump? If not, what was the nature of the threats against the president from inside the alleged premiere law enforcement agency in the United States?
“(Director) Wray wants a lid on this,” the FBI official said. “Many know there was talk of harming Trump politically but there is a group here (in D.C. HQ) that understands it goes deeper. We need a special counsel or Homeland Security. Somebody has to clean this up outside of DOJ. It is unacceptable.
“This is much larger than just texts between two FBI agents.”
The FBI official called on President Trump to do what is necessary to weed out corruption in the FBI.
“Text messages just don’t disappear,” the FBI official said. “Not here. Someone outside DOJ has to look at all emails and texts. These (FBI bosses) are bad people. You’ve only scratched the surface.”
The high-ranking FBI official called on lawmakers and the Inspector General to focus on the text and email messages of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. The official referred to McCabe’s official and personal correspondences “an anti-Trump treasure trove.”
As reported in March 2017 by True Pundit, McCabe openly threatened President Trump and then-National Security Adviser Gen. Mike Flynn, saying first we “ Flynn and then we Trump” to several high-ranking FBI bosses who cheered his comment.
From that True Pundit Exclusive:
McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official, emphatically declared at the invite-only gathering with raised voice: “ Flynn and then we Trump,” according to direct sources. Many of his top lieutenants applauded and cheered such rhetoric. A scattered few did not.
This was one of several such meetings held in seclusion among key FBI leaders since Trump was elected president, FBI sources confirm. At the congregation where McCabe went off the political rails and vowed to destroy Flynn and Trump, there were as many as 16 top FBI officials, inside intelligence sources said. No lower-level agents or support personnel were present.
If you are among the millions of Americans who have pondered in recent months whether the Obama-era “Deep State” intelligence apparatus and FBI are working for or against Trump, this is the first definitive proof that the country’s once-premiere law enforcement agency has gone rogue.
The non-elected hierarchy that steer the FBI have declared war on President Trump and his White House inner circle. Make no mistake.
Flynn has since been indicted and plead guilty to a charge of lying to the FBI from an investigation supervised by McCabe after a FBI interview conducted by Peter Strzok, one of the agents busted sending anti-Trump texts. And Trump remains under investigation by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, a figure linked to several conflicts of interest in the case including prior deals with McCabe.
As reported yesterday in True Pundit, members of the FBI and Justice Department’s top brass at their Washington D.C.headquarters and other field offices are now using burner phones to stay under the radar of federal investigators and lawmakers, according to FBI insiders.
The shocking revelations come on the heels of news that the FBI deleted thousands of text messages between anti-Trump FBI agents before investigators could review their content.
While that is disturbing on one level, FBI and DOJ hierarchy employing the telecom habits of drug cartel bosses reaches a new low for the once-heralded federal law enforcement agency and the DOJ. And breaks federal laws as well.
The FBI “failed to preserve” five months worth of text messages exchanged between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the two FBI employees who made pro-Clinton and anti-Trump comments while working on the Clinton email and the Russia collusion investigations.
And now more text messages are missing from more FBI agents, according to the Justice Department.
That means 50,000 text messages.
Fifty.
Thousand.
Per The Hill yesterday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday announced the Justice Department will investigate missing text messages sent between two FBI agents critical of President Trump, joining the chorus of Republican lawmakers who are eager to recover the exchange.
GOP officials have seized on the messages as evidence of FBI bias against Trump in the probes into Russian election meddling and Hillary Clinton‘s use of a private email server as secretary of State.
“We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source,” Sessions said in a statement.
https://truepundit.com/fbi-official-fbi-agents-threatened-physical-harm-president-trump-missing-fbi-texts-frightening-communications/
to be fair, djohn usually makes about 9 separate posts for each article (for some reason he thinks its not redundant to post a dozen different tweets that link to the same article)
You didn't really fix it. You just shortened it, leaving out the part where Obama outmaneuvered Trump's chumps.
uh oh chris... shh no truepundit pieces around here. they're going to crucify you for posting a legit news outlet. oh no they're going to crucify me too for saying this. lolFBI Official: FBI Agents Threatened Physical Harm to President Trump In Missing FBI Texts & Other “Frightening” Communications
Anonymous leakers good now.
Doubt they will read it.
Wow, that is a lot of zeros. With that many messages there must be something horrible in there.
No one ever deletes"what do you want on your sandwich" texts.
Mueller asked U.S. intelligence officials about Trump
Senior U.S. intelligence officers including CIA Director Mike Pompeo have been questioned by the U.S. special counsel’s team
about whether President Donald Trump tried to obstruct justice in the Russia probe,
Such questioning is further indication that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s federal investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election and potential collusion by Trump’s campaign includes examining the president’s actions around the probe.
In interviews last year with Pompeo, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and National Security Agency Director Admiral Mike Rogers,
Mueller’s team focused on whether Trump had asked them to lean on former FBI Director James Comey,
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...litics+News%29
you dismiss what you don't want to believe. doesn't matter how many 0's are behind that 5. what matters is the fact there's a coverup going on to delete, scrap, hide those texts. why is that if there's nothing worth looking at in those texts?
Wow, that is a lot of zeros. With that many messages there must be something horrible in there.
No one ever deletes"what do you want on your sandwich" texts.
Anonymous tweeter good for joke:
What gives, TSA?
Explain.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
