Pau and Patty are in slightly different situations. In a sense they could have let both walk or dragged on negotiations with both hoping to get better deals. In that regard, they are the same. However, they could have avoided guaranteed money in the third year of Pau's deal by giving him more APY over a two-year deal. In this sense they are different. In the sense I think you mean it, who knows how much better of deals they could have gotten by playing hard ball? For all we know, Patty could have gotten a $45M/3 deal in free agency. I don't think that's unreasonable looking at Re 's, Teague and Hill's contracts.
Patty has a decent future if Manu and Tony both retire. Dude fits fine with Murray and White going forward. Same with Kyle if he's retained. Definitely a deal that getting out of makes sense, though.Whats disappointing is that they didnt really plan for the future. Patty is a bench player that has no higher ceiling than where he is right now. Might even decline in coming seasons too when that quickness takes a step back and he’s no longer coming off screens like a fastball.
As I've been hinting at throughout the season, I'm pretty sure Pop is playing two-PG lineups on purpose and that this has been his plan since last year. He was probably going to start Parker and Paul had CP3 agreed to sign with SA.It’s just disappointing that they are stuck with defensively challenged midget lineups bc they are going to have to find playing time for the 50 million man, + Tony, thus pushing everyone else out of their spots and possibly taking playing time from more well rounded players to play a glass cannon

Reply With Quote
so maybe he doesn’t have a filter and thinks things through b4 he spouts them out.
