Reply With Quote
Words matter. Trump obviously didnt fire him, so he didnt order him to be fired.You just made a grand prediction about the entire investigation and you can't even venture a guess as to why Trump ordered the firing of the lead investigator.
its all about the amount of slobbering.
Words matter. Trump obviously didnt fire him, so he didnt order him to be fired.
slobbering in massive amounts.
Trump had just met with Mueller the previous month to see if he wanted to head the FBI again.
So why order his firing a month later?
Loyalty demands, kneejerk firings, demonizing free press... Didn't know so many Americans were cool with 3rd World Dictator leadership.
but the stock market!
Here I thought Trump supporters distrusted government. Hence the swamp draining and crooked Hillary etc
Wow. Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber, I read this.
What's funny is that you don't even know how dumb this is.
Right. And when the casino produces a hundred more Enrons, I'm sure the idea that Trump's deregulatory policies caused another collapse will be #fakenews.
Don't forget hiring relatives, funneling government money into your businesses, and using your position to benefit those businesses and actively ignoring cons utional prohibitions against this.
GOP is ting all over itself trying to defend this guy. What a hill to die on.
Good points. Also the obvious... TV celebrity as leader of the country.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...himself/551588In isolation, legal experts say, one of these actions might be explainable. But taken together, the president’s repeated attempts to interfere with the investigation, along with his denials, could indicate the “corrupt intent” necessary for an obstruction case.
“The firing of Jim Comey, standing alone, was ambiguous. Trump might plausibly contend that he fired Comey for an innocent reason unrelated to the Russia investigation—namely, that he thought Comey was unqualified to direct the FBI given his track record,” said Green. “But if it’s true that Trump also tried to fire Robert Mueller, innocent intent becomes less plausible. There would now be a stronger inference that Trump has been acting all along with the intent to impede the Russia investigation, since that was the central part of Mueller’s assignment. And if one thinks that Trump’s supposed reasons for trying to fire Mueller sound implausible and pretextual, the inference of corrupt intent becomes stronger still.”
Tell me what your open mind thinks about this.
Or will you curl up on a fetal position muttering about Hillary?
Seriously CC, have you even read anything about this story? You're stunningly ignorant today.
But the blue hysteria! It’s okay for Trump to do all this , as long as we get lulz from libcuck meltdowns!
trump derangement syndrome tbh
probably doesnt realize what the saturday night massacre was tbh
Seriously CC, have you even read anything about this story? You're stunningly ignorant today.
obviously nixon didnt order Cox fired until all those AG's resigned and bork did the deed
Yeah, you don't even have to speculate what a storm firing a Special Prosecutor/Counsel would cause -- we already know because it already happened.
The fact CC lived through Watergate makes his rabid Trump defense so disingenuous.
Or maybe he thinks Nixon was an innocent victim of the deep state too.
2008 texted an lol at det zing
Lets talk again when you move out of your mommys house and get a job.
Nixon was impeached for covering up a proven crime. Get back to me when they prove Trump conspired with the Russians to rig the election.
Why did Trump order Mueller's firing, CC?
CC is digging in
Asked and answered., chump.
Simple fact, simpleton.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
