Reply With Quote
Verde is such a class act. Happy that he will be a Spur for a several more seasons!!!
San Antonio Spurs
7 hrs ·
What has Danny been up to this off-season? Rachel sat down with him find out.
One on One with Danny Green
nba.com
Verde is such a class act. Happy that he will be a Spur for a several more seasons!!!
Green is good people.
I think Green's humbled by how he became a legit NBA player. I honestly think the Spurs organization cares about their players' futures and even if Green dropped as a player this current contract, he'd be a part of the organization in some way or another if he needed or wanted to. Loyalty begets loyalty.
DG just an all around quality dude. Proud he remains a Spur
bump...
still a ridiculous bargain deal..
Exactly.bump...
still a ridiculous bargain deal
DG wasn't even worth the minimumbump...
still a ridiculous bargain deal
last two years...
Explain that statement while not being stupid and emotional, please.
One of the most valuable contracts on the team. His quality at pre-2016 price.
In the current nba, this is a great contract.
this contract, tbh..Danny can have another putrid shooting season and he would only be a 3rd or 4th most overpaid dude in the team as long his D holds up..
i do not agree with this statementthis contract, tbh
It's not a good contract. If you're making as much or more in millions per season than your PER, it's not a good contract. Steph Curry will only make $2.1M more than Danny Green next season. THAT is a good contract.
Even ignoring the fact that PER is a terrible stat, it should never be used to rate low-usage perimeter players, tbh..see: Bowen, Battier, role player Iguodala, etc..
Worst contract in Spurs history tbh
Worst contract in Spurs history tbh
only the third worst now, but still
Holy ingonly the third worst now, but stillgreat bump tbh
Still not sure who the bigger waste of life is between him, Flabby mills, and Kylie Ander
^^^
Terrible posters and their terrible takes, tbh.
Spurs need to make some trades. Like the draft and off-season, I'd have no problem including Danny in trade packages if that brings back someone more consistent on offense that can create a little bit and score on his own.
100+ pages of Jimmer^^^
Terrible posters and their terrible takes, tbh.
What a virgin lmfaoooooo
Yea, I'm as ty as it gets
The days of Danny Green having trade value are long gone. He's more of a throw in guy to match salaries and push trades through. Most teams would probably be unwilling to trade their scrubs to get one in return. I mean, what's the point? Who would it benefit?
If the Spurs had done the right thing and kept Simmons at $6 million, they'd be able to move on from Green and even though he's not as reliable a shooter he's a great penetrator and defender.
Instead, as easily foreseeable, they're screwed:
No cap room to sign a replacement even half as good as Simmons would have been.
And they might have to give Green another big deal now that he's on the wrong side of 30.
It'll be awesome to have Mills and Green soaking up $25-30 million in cap when neither can create for themselves or others and are in their 30s. At least Green can defend ... for now. Once that falls off ....
If you meant he's great at getting penetrated and his offense turns into bad defense, I agree.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
