Reply With Quote
peterson is of sound mind. love listening to his lectures and small clips when he puts sjw's in their place.
https://youtu.be/iEJ1QHu-KEQ
Gotcha moment from beginning to 1:25. Old news I know but I had to find out what all the memes we're about
peterson is of sound mind. love listening to his lectures and small clips when he puts sjw's in their place.
For all you ST Repug incels and assorted bubbas, kickers, losers, gun fellators, obese slobs, etc who can't laid
Jordan Peterson advocates for 'enforced monogamy,' defends the existence of witches and dragons
blames violent attacks by men on the fact that they do not have wives,
Mr. Peterson does not pause when he says this.
Enforced monogamy is, to him, simply a rational solution.
Otherwise women will all only go for the most high-status men, he explains, and that couldn't make either gender happy in the end.
http://theweek.com/speedreads/774024...itches-dragons
I was going to make an official Jordan Peterson thread to commemorate the man, but this will do. I will post some youtubes later today.
No, create your own thread. No reason to use a thread with basically no comments and a le.
Meh. Another whiney ass conservative POS with a sense of en lement and persecution complex.
These ers need to constantly play their victim card using all the manufactured outrage they can.
The First Rule Of Jordan Peterson Club Is No One Is Allowed To Criticize Jordan Peterson
You know how when you were a kid at slumber parties, you’d all gather in a dark bathroom to say “Bloody Mary” three times in a mirror? And yet, somehow, Bloody Mary never showed up? Not so for Jordan Peterson supporters! If you say Jordan Peterson on Twitter even once, you will be met immediately with a barrage of angry men demanding to know if you have read and listened to every word that has ever come out of his mouth, and why you hate critical thinking and logic so much. If you quote him (instead of reciting one of his two hour lectures verbatim), you will be accused of “twisting” his words. So expect things to get real weird in the comments section today.
Because they are devoted. Like, reaaaaaalllllly devoted.
They’re like, Sam Harris fans times Taylor Swift fans times 1,000.
But why? Well, as my mother says, “people will love you for the way you make them feel about themselves.” Young men love Jordan Peterson, and desperately so, because he makes them feel ecstatically good about themselves. He tells them that while others may see them — straight white cis men — as a group, specifically a group that has benefited from the oppression of other groups, he sees them all as unique, special individuals. Oh, and that the entire narrative of oppression of other groups is not even real. He tells them that they can think critically, that they are rational, that they are logical. More or less, he blows smoke up their asses while putting on the persona of subs ute dad. He tells them the things they want to hear, the things they believe in their bones to be true, and he makes it sound smart. Ish.
What certain men — specifically men who feel left behind — want right now is to be told that, rather than being kind of backwards, they are logical, rational, critical thinkers. These are traits they imagine they hold over women, who are, of course, emotional and irrational.
The thing is, a small amount of the things he says are totally reasonable, if not just regular, normal self-help type things — things like “clean your room” and “stand up straight” — and this is what people will generally accuse you of being mad at when you disagree with other things he has to say.
Read more at https://wonkette.com/633856/wonkspla...ClpQHJlBbEQ.99
He deserves better, you're right.
Redistribution good now.
Incels need concubines.
Liberty loving IDWs think women should be passed around -- forcibly, by the government -- to keep incels contented and docile.
Lol compulsory monogamy for women, to prevent assortative mating.
Affirmative action for incels, tbh.
according to Jordan Peterson, it's a public safety issue that trumps liberty for half of humanity,
can't get some?
nanny state to the rescue.
immediately posts a whiny wonkette article
"This is plainly dishonest reportage. First off, Peterson is using well-established anthropological language here: “enforced monogamy” does not mean government-enforced monogamy. “Enforced monogamy” means socially-promoted, culturally-inculcated monogamy, as opposed to genetic monogamy – evolutionarily-dictated monogamy, which does exist in some species (but does not exist in humans). This distinction has been present in anthropological and scientific literature for decades.
So, here’s what Peterson is not arguing: that women should be forced to marry men to cure the insecurity of incels. But that's what Bowles says he's saying, and then calls it "absurd." Because she's a very objective reporter, don't you see.
Here’s what Peterson is arguing: socially-enforced monogamy results in more pairings, and fewer situations in which multiple women choose one man, leaving other men without partners. This is statistically unassailable. Removing socially-enforced monogamy results in a hierarchy in which women choose the most desirable men, since many women can now have sex with one man. Peterson argues that this leads to a counterintuitive result as well: desirable men are less likely to settle down with one woman, making women less satisfied with their relationships with men as well."
https://www.dailywire.com/news/30825...mpression=true
that's not what Peterson said. that's pure spin.
Certainly is a nice hit piece by the New York Times though.
in the interview he acknowledged the contradiction.
Peterson stood by his point; you're too pussy to.
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-18-2018 at 08:19 PM.
I've never seen any video of him saying anything to that nature. Just a biased piece by nyt. I
did you read it?
did you notice what he said, or are you just parroting someone else's gloss?
equalitarian distribution of sexual opportunity was discussed, who's gonna enforce that?
are you pining for it now?
Do you believe there should be equalitarian distribution of pussy, Nathan?
"Violent attacks are what happens when men do not have partners, Mr. Peterson says, and society needs to work to make sure those men are married.
“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”
It's not a mandate by law to marry unwanted people. It's a society values monogamy and perhaps the value in the current legal structure.
Jordan Peterson does.
For the common good.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
