Reply With Quote
Your celebrity good.
who could ever forget that misogynist feminist? that crybaby sob.
this is hilarious. who's celebrities? "i'd listen to woolery anyday over schmucks like colbert...and oliver" your reading comprehension skills blows balls just like your dip shtick of round about questions.
Your celebrity good.
you and pav... smh
i don't follow nor keep up with woolery not even .01%... if given the choice though, colbert, oliver, kimmel, and the rest of them sissys.
you're a ing re pav. plain and simple.
guys i dont like democrat celebs, i only like republican celebs!
but both sides!
They get paid to regurgitate Radical Socialist doctrine. Traitors to our beloved Republic. SAD!
lol another conspiracy
good for you. you and pav both have ty reading comprehension skills. nice!
The Nunes Conspiracy Theory
The impossibly tangled web behind these bogus accusations.
such an allegation, if true, would require a vast number of people—across two branches of government—to be on board and willing to put their careers on the line for a conspiracy.
1. When Did the FBI Open an Investigation on Carter Page?
THE TAKEAWAY:
If the Nunes memo does not indicate when the investigation underlying the Page FISA application was opened or how many months/years of investigative activity it included preceding the dossier, it is not telling a complete or accurate story.
2. Who in the DOJ Conducted the Woods Procedures on the FISA Application?
THE TAKEAWAY:
If the Nunes memo doesn’t address who conducted the Woods procedures for the Page FISA application, any material deficiencies in those procedures, or address this part of the DOJ review process at all, it is skipping over a critical part of the vetting process.
3. Who Was the Federal Judge Who Approved the Memo?
THE TAKEAWAY:
Alleging a concerted conspiracy by the FBI/DOJ in obtaining the Page FISA
necessarily implicates the judge who approved it and suggests they are incompetent (at best) or corrupt (at worst).
If Nunes is alleging serious crimes on the part of the FBI and DOJ, he must put his money where his mouth is and identify the judge who approved the FISA application. If he doesn’t, it’s likely because even he knows that his accusations don’t have any solid basis.
4. Was the FISA Warrant Ever Extended?
THE TAKEAWAY:
Neither the FBI nor the DOJ has the power to extend a FISA surveillance order; they must request it. If a request to extend FISA surveillance that began in September 2016 was made by Rosenstein in or around March 2017, the FBI had shown a federal judge that it had collected additional foreign intelligence information justifying the original order at least once already, around December 2016. The Nunes memo should address the fact that additional information validating the original FISA order was obtained and reviewed and approved by a (potentially additional) federal judge, in addition to new administration staff at the DOJ.
5. Has Robert Mueller Used Anything Derived From the FISA in His Investigation?
THE TAKEAWAY:
Anything that discredits the Page FISA application by definition is intended to cast doubt on the Mueller investigation. This may also be an attempted implication of the Nunes memo if it tries to tar Rosenstein, as each major step that has been taken by Mueller has been approved by Rosenstein. If this is the case, then Mueller should be named directly in the memo as someone who has personally engaged in misconduct in reliance on the Page warrant. If he is not, it is because
Nunes knows that this is a line he cannot politically cross directly without real evidence—and is trying to do so indirectly.
In sum,
the Nunes memo reportedly
alleges that at least a dozen FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors fabricated evidence,
engaged in a criminal conspiracy to commit perjury,
lucked out on being randomly assigned Judge Low Blood Sugar who looked the other way, and—coincidentally—
ended up obtaining evidence that justified extending the initial FISA surveillance.
This conspiracy was presumably signed off on by former FBI Director James Comey—
who, while conspiring to bring down Trump, actually shifted the election in his favor by informing Congress he had reopened the Hillary Clinton email investigation one month after the Page FISA warrant.
The sham FISA was validated by one or more federal judges who either didn’t know better or were in on the whole secret,
and later accepted and used by special counsel Mueller who was not a part of the FBI during this time at all. And despite this widespread and outrageous conduct,
the current assistant attorney general, a Trump appointee, wrote Nunes about the memo to say, “we are currently unaware of any wrongdoing relating to the FISA process.”
If Nunes has in fact single-handedly uncovered this vast criminal enterprise, it’s hard to know what’s more astonishing:
that a government bureaucracy managed to pull it off—or
that Nunes has exposed it all in a scant four-page memo.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...cy-theory.html
why would you prefer chuck woolery's political statements any day to those other guys?
Oh look the non republican takes another stance on where his views lies.
celebs but I'll listen to Woolery all day.
Trump but I'll defend him till I die.
i don't prefer any of them. that's why i don't follow any on twitter nor watch any on tv. i don't keep up with any of them.
why would you lend an ear to either colbert or oliver? why?
sundance?
so why do you prefer woolery to democrat celebrities?
i dont watch colbert. i lend an ear to oliver's show because it tends to be informative and well sourced. plus he's funny
wrong on everything tranny.Oh look the non republican takes another stance on where his views lies.
celebs but I'll listen to Woolery all day.
Trump but I'll defend him till I die.
this is what should had been said by you but your bias is so far out there and so is your "gender".
celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day over Colbert or Oliver if I had to.
Trump but I'll defend anyone against a mob of losers who think they know better, have a heard mentality, act on pure hatred, and let their emotions control their actions without facts/truth to back up their far left bias.
Welp.Oh look the non republican takes another stance on where his views lies.
celebs but I'll listen to Woolery all day.
Trump but I'll defend him till I die.
well , you want me to list them all? that. i love dave chappelle and he voted for that **** HRC.
as well, i caught an episode of the view today and those women are enough to throw my hands up and claim your whole party ing sucks. if that's the bar, those old hags, then the left altogether. i still believe in real liberals but i have a hard time running into them these days and instead a bunch of psychos took over their party.
you want to look more and more like a biased far left loon or what? making the case pretty easy i see.
why'd you take my quote out of context dip ?
this is what you quoted but...
" celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day"
this is what i stated. hmmm...
" celebs but I'd listen to Woolery all day over Colbert or Oliver if I had to."
lets play your game pav.
why did you quote me out of context?
So, celebs except the ones like Woolery whom you would listen to all day under the right cir stances.
For this kind of response.
Everyone can see all the quotes.
You just described what you do on a daily basis here.
You meltdown more often than Wild Cobra ever did. And that's saying something, tats.
Fusion GPS Lawyers Blast Sen. Chuck Grassley For ‘Knowingly’ Endangering Lives of Firm’s Staffers
Lawyers for Fusion GPS slammed Sen. Chuck Grassley for endangering the lives of the firm’s employees after the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee made public a letter identifying a number of its staffers.
In a response sent to Grassley, the Fusion GPS lawyers blasted the senator — as well as his colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham —
for revealing the names of Fusion GPS employees,
“even after we had requested – in writing – that the names of employees not be disclosed to the public because of well-founded concerns about their public safety.”
“We have explained to your staff on multiple occasions that Fusion GPS has received threats to its company, its property and its employees, and that counsel has reported these matters twice to the police,” the Fusion GPS lawyers wrote.
“Ignoring our requests, your office knowingly put these people in danger, by releasing their names,” the lawyers wrote. “These leaks are unauthorized and unethical.”
https://www.mediaite.com/online/fusi...irms-staffers/
why do you think i'd listen to woolery in the first place??
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions