Grassley's Oversight Investigation into the political corruption of the FBI and DOJ

[koriwhat]

For this kind of response.

Everyone can see all the quotes.

so why'd you take my words out of context and shorten the actual quote to fit your narrative?

[koriwhat]

Fusion GPS Lawyers Blast Sen. Chuck Grassley For ‘Knowingly’ Endangering Lives of Firm’s Staffers

Lawyers for Fusion GPS slammed Sen. Chuck Grassley for endangering the lives of the firm’s employees after the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee made public a letter identifying a number of its staffers.

In a response sent to Grassley, the Fusion GPS lawyers blasted the senator — as well as his colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham —

for revealing the names of Fusion GPS employees,

“even after we had requested – in writing – that the names of employees not be disclosed to the public because of well-founded concerns about their public safety.”

“We have explained to your staff on multiple occasions that Fusion GPS has received threats to its company, its property and its employees, and that counsel has reported these matters twice to the police,” the Fusion GPS lawyers wrote.

“Ignoring our requests, your office knowingly put these people in danger, by releasing their names,” the lawyers wrote. “These leaks are unauthorized and unethical.”

https://www.mediaite.com/online/fusi...irms-staffers/

i hope that fusionGPS and its staffers all find there way under 6ft of dirt asap. fusionGPS & their staffers. boohoo fake news!

[spurraider21]

well , you want me to list them all? that. i love dave chappelle and he voted for that **** HRC.

as well, i caught an episode of the view today and those women are enough to throw my hands up and claim your whole party ing sucks. if that's the bar, those old hags, then the left altogether. i still believe in real liberals but i have a hard time running into them these days and instead a bunch of psychos took over their party.

we've already established that what you call "real liberalism" is actually just conservatism

[Pavlov]

so why'd you take my words out of context and shorten the actual quote to fit your narrative?

For this kind of response.

Everyone can see all the quotes.

[koriwhat]

You just described what you do on a daily basis here.

You meltdown more often than Wild Cobra ever did. And that's saying something, tats.

go suck another you wannabe chick.

[Pavlov]

why do you think i'd listen to woolery in the first place??

Because you said you would listen to him all day under that right cir stances.

[koriwhat]

we've already established that what you call "real liberalism" is actually just conservatism

lmao

[koriwhat]

Because you said you would listen to him all day under that right cir stances.

and why wouldn't i listen to colbert or oliver?

[spurraider21]

lmao

i know, it was funny then too

[DisAsTerBot]

go suck another you wannabe chick.

lol calls reck a tranny but complains about herd mentality and letting emotions control their actions without facts
Unreal

[Pavlov]

and why wouldn't i listen to colbert or oliver?

Because you're a Republican.

[koriwhat]

lol calls reck a tranny but complains about herd mentality and letting emotions control their actions without facts
Unreal

lmao... so many emotions, so little time. i call him tranny because him.

[koriwhat]

Because you're a Republican.

why do you insist i'm a republican pav?

[Pavlov]

why do you insist i'm a republican pav?

Call 'em like I see 'em.

[koriwhat]

Call 'em like I see 'em.

why not back those opinions up with facts pav?

[Pavlov]

why not back those opinions up with facts pav?

You pretty much support every Republican politician and Republican position here. I'm sure there are exceptions but it's enough to make the call.

[koriwhat]

You pretty much support every Republican politician and Republican position here. I'm sure there are exceptions but it's enough to make the call.

you'll believe whatever your bias dictates you to. why is that pav?

[Pavlov]

you'll believe whatever your bias dictates you to. why is that pav?

I go by the evidence. You're free to try to change my opinion if it's important to you. You're not doing a good job so far.

[koriwhat]

I go by the evidence. You're free to try to change my opinion if it's important to you. You're not doing a good job so far.

what evidence do you reference exactly?

[Pavlov]

what evidence do you reference exactly?

Your posts in the political forum.

[koriwhat]

Your posts in the political forum.

which posts would those be exactly?

[Pavlov]

which posts would those be exactly?

There are dozens. Maybe hundreds. I'm not the only one who has pointed this out. Would you like for me to let you know when a post provides such evidence going forward?

[koriwhat]

There are dozens. Maybe hundreds. I'm not the only one who has pointed this out. Would you like for me to let you know when a post provides such evidence going forward?

no, i'd like you to provide evidence now, like you demand always, if you're up to it. are you up to proving your stance?

[Pavlov]

no, i'd like you to provide evidence now, like you demand always, if you're up to it. are you up to proving your stance?

You should look back at all the times people say you're a Republican after you post something. Shouldn't take you long if you're up to it and if it's as important to you as your line of questioning suggests. That is the evidence.

[koriwhat]

You should look back at all the times people say you're a Republican after you post something. Shouldn't take you long if you're up to it and if it's as important to you as your line of questioning suggests. That is the evidence.

pav, this is on you to prove. i don't give a what those losers call me. so with that said, are you going to provide proof or just sit on your ass like always and hope others do the leg work for you?